Advice please.
Spireite Member 65 posts Joined Nov 2005 More info | Dec 27, 2005 09:46 | #1 Advice please. Thanks
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mknabster Senior Member 827 posts Joined Jul 2005 Location: Limerick, PA, USA More info | Dec 27, 2005 14:22 | #2 I don't know much about the Sigma, but i have the 430 EX for my G6, and i absolutely love it. This is my first flash, and i have actually only have had it for 2 days, but it's a very good accesory. You'll definately distinguish the difference between the built in flash as compared to this one. - Matt
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JMHPhotography Goldmember 4,784 posts Likes: 1 Joined May 2005 Location: New Hampshire More info | Dec 27, 2005 14:53 | #3 |
CurtisN Master Flasher 19,129 posts Likes: 11 Joined Apr 2005 Location: Northern Illinois, US More info | Dec 27, 2005 15:17 | #4 Read up on the specifications of each, to determine which might best meet your needs. If there's a specific feature you don't understand, the folks here can help. Both units are well-built and will perform as their specifications indicate. "If you're not having fun, your pictures will reflect that." - Joe McNally
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Thanks for the info, I think I will save for a bit longer and get the higher spec canon Thanks
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LarryM Member 136 posts Joined Aug 2005 Location: Pacific Northwest More info | forkball wrote: I have the 500 DG Super and love it. It's a bit more powerful than the 430 EX, for the same money or less. John, Canon 20D
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jon Cream of the Crop 69,628 posts Likes: 227 Joined Jun 2004 Location: Bethesda, MD USA More info | Dec 28, 2005 12:48 | #7 DG ST and DG Super are two different animals. The Super runs, IIRC, around $200 at B&H. ISTR the ST doesn't do wireless, either as master or as slave, while the Super does both. Jon
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CurtisN Master Flasher 19,129 posts Likes: 11 Joined Apr 2005 Location: Northern Illinois, US More info | Dec 28, 2005 13:07 | #8 Yes, there are several differences between the ST and the Super. In addition to the wireless master/slave capability that Jon mentioned, the Super has a greater range of manual power settings, high-speed sync (FP flash) and a few other bells & whistles. "If you're not having fun, your pictures will reflect that." - Joe McNally
LOG IN TO REPLY |
m3incorp Senior Member 989 posts Joined Jul 2005 Location: Colorado, USA More info | Dec 28, 2005 13:36 | #9 I love my Sigma 500 DG Super and the cycle time is really good in most situations. 7D, 10D, Canon EFS 18-55mm modded
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JonathanS Senior Member 326 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jul 2005 Location: Atlante, GA More info | Curtis N: Canon's website doesn't say whether or not the 430EX has high-speed sync (FP flash). It's one capability of the Sigma that I wouldn't want to be without.
Canon Digital Rebel 300D (unDutchables 0.2.3)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LarryM Member 136 posts Joined Aug 2005 Location: Pacific Northwest More info | Thanks Jon, Curtis and m3incorp for your input. Canon 20D
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CurtisN Master Flasher 19,129 posts Likes: 11 Joined Apr 2005 Location: Northern Illinois, US More info | Larry M wrote: Six seconds seems like a long time. You're right, it does seem like a long time, but I'm sure you're smart enough not to use alkaline batteries. "If you're not having fun, your pictures will reflect that." - Joe McNally
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tim Light Bringer 51,010 posts Likes: 375 Joined Nov 2004 Location: Wellington, New Zealand More info | Dec 28, 2005 21:35 | #13 I rarely use full power on the flash, cycle time on the 580 is usually a second or two. If i'm in a real hurry I have the CP-E3 which does a full charge in less time than I can measure. Beware though, the cord on that thing's a bit short. Also I think it's for the 550/580 only, don't think the Sigma or 430 have a high voltage port. Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
alpineslide Junior Member 22 posts Joined Oct 2005 More info | Larry M wrote: Thanks Jon, Curtis and m3incorp for your input. I've looked at them and they seem pretty close in the specs, except on the recycle times, 3.7 seconds on the 430EX and 6 seconds on both the 580EX and Sigma EF-500 DG Super. Six seconds seems like a long time but then I don't have anything to compare it to. Larry M.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CurtisN Master Flasher 19,129 posts Likes: 11 Joined Apr 2005 Location: Northern Illinois, US More info | alpineslide wrote: Isn't the cycle time a bit shorter with rechargeable batteries ? Yes. "If you're not having fun, your pictures will reflect that." - Joe McNally
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography 1374 guests, 142 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||