Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Visual Enjoyment Weddings & Other Family Events 
Thread started 27 Dec 2005 (Tuesday) 10:20
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Lenses - Which zoom lens?

 
snapshot9670
Member
Avatar
115 posts
Joined Dec 2005
Location: San Francisco, California
     
Dec 27, 2005 10:20 |  #1

Ok, so I placed my order for lenses over the weekend, but have second thoughts on one and need advice ASAP (could still make the change with B&H).

3 Lenses I purchased over the weekend:

Canon Telephoto EF 85mm f/1.8
Canon Normal 50mm f/1.8
*Sigma zoom telephoto 70-300mm f/4-5.6

*I'm thinking for weddings I wouldn't really need that much zoom range, right? I was actually thinking about going with a Canon 55-200mm lense (speed is the same as the Sigma). Is Sigma a good brand? Does it make a big difference going with a lense other than a Canon? (I have the EOS XT)

Thoughts? :confused:

Snapshot


Canon Rebel XT (Black)
Canon 50mm 1.8
Canon 85mm 1.8
Sigma 24-70 2.8 EX DG
A couple of GB cards
Lumiquest Ultra Bounce
430EX Speedlite

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
condyk
Africa's #1 Tour Guide
Avatar
20,886 posts
Likes: 19
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Birmingham, UK
     
Dec 27, 2005 10:41 |  #2

The APO DG version of this lens is about the best buy under the rather more expensive 70-200 f4 Canon L. I know nothing about weddings but I doubt you'll need such a zoom and even if you did it would probably be indoors and this one is too slow. You will need a monopod to get the best from it. The cheaper zooms like this are generally a bit soft at 200mm and up. What about a wider angle for group shots instead? Do you have a flash?


https://photography-on-the.net …/showthread.php​?t=1203740

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
snapshot9670
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
115 posts
Joined Dec 2005
Location: San Francisco, California
     
Dec 27, 2005 10:59 as a reply to  @ condyk's post |  #3

The cheaper zooms like this are generally a bit soft at 200mm and up. What about a wider angle for group shots instead? Do you have a flash?

I figured as much (on the 200mm softness). So would you recommend the 55-200mm zoom from Canon instead?

http://www.bhphotovide​o.com …ghType=category​Navigation (external link)

As far as the wide angle goes, since I'm just starting out and have a limited budget, I was looking at the 18-55mm (the one that comes with the XT and 20D)...cheap I know, but all of the wide angle lenses that I looked at cost a pretty penny. Any entry or mid level ones you could recommend?

As far as flash goes...looking at picking up the 550EX or 430EX speedlite to start. Will that work?


Canon Rebel XT (Black)
Canon 50mm 1.8
Canon 85mm 1.8
Sigma 24-70 2.8 EX DG
A couple of GB cards
Lumiquest Ultra Bounce
430EX Speedlite

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SkipD
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,475 posts
Likes: 154
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Southeastern WI, USA
     
Dec 27, 2005 11:15 |  #4

Snapshot - all the lenses you've listed so far either fall into the telephoto range if you're using an APS-C camera body (such as the Digital Rebel, XT, 20D, etc.) or are way too slow for much natural light work. For doing weddings, you will definitely want some faster and shorter lenses.

The best single zoom lens that I could recommend - though it isn't inexpensive - is the Canon 24-70mm f/2.8. You could probably shoot a whole wedding and never take that one off the body. It is fast enough for a lot of the natural light situations you'll run into. Its focal length range will handle most, if not all, the situations you'll run into. It's also an extremely well built lens, rugged enough to last you for decades.

In addition, the lens design coupled with the supplied lens hood is by far the best design ever. The lens hood is rather deep. You'd think that it wouldn't work at wide-angle zoom settings. However, the fact is that the lens extends for the wide-angle settings and retracts for the longer settings. Since the hood is mounted to the non-moving lens barrel, this places the front element of the lens only an inch or so behind the front of the hood at 24mm, and about three inches back at 70mm. It will do the absolute best job of protecting the image from stray light and protecting the lens from physical damage of any lens/hood combination on the market.


Skip Douglas
A few cameras and over 50 years behind them .....
..... but still learning all the time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
snapshot9670
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
115 posts
Joined Dec 2005
Location: San Francisco, California
     
Dec 27, 2005 12:12 as a reply to  @ SkipD's post |  #5

Thanks for the tips/info skip!

Yeah, you're right..that lens isn't inexpensive. Will this one do...

http://www.bhphotovide​o.com …EG&addedTroughT​ype=search (external link)

So in addition to the telephoto zoom lense, the other lenses I mentioned aren't good enough for weddings either?


Canon Rebel XT (Black)
Canon 50mm 1.8
Canon 85mm 1.8
Sigma 24-70 2.8 EX DG
A couple of GB cards
Lumiquest Ultra Bounce
430EX Speedlite

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
condyk
Africa's #1 Tour Guide
Avatar
20,886 posts
Likes: 19
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Birmingham, UK
     
Dec 27, 2005 12:19 |  #6

The Sigma 24-70 2.8 DG EX Macro is a very good lens. The motor is a little buzzy but fast and accurate in my experience. The Tamron 28-70 is a little cheaper and also very popular. With the 85mm (superb lens) and Kit lens (quite practical if stopped down) and a decent flash you probably have the basic kit you might need. I would personally use a tripod for any group shots. These will be hard to organise, judging from my own and other weddings I've been to, and very hard to repeat if you don't get it right.


https://photography-on-the.net …/showthread.php​?t=1203740

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
snapshot9670
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
115 posts
Joined Dec 2005
Location: San Francisco, California
     
Dec 27, 2005 12:37 as a reply to  @ condyk's post |  #7

Great! Thanks Condyk! I'll look into the Tamron lense as well. Would you say that this could be, more or less, an all-in-one lens for a wedding?

I just called BH Photo...too late...couldn't modify my order, the Sigma 70-300mm is on it's way too :cry: . They said I could return it, but I hate to go through that hassle.

Keep it? I'm sure it'll serve some purpose down the road, yeah?


Canon Rebel XT (Black)
Canon 50mm 1.8
Canon 85mm 1.8
Sigma 24-70 2.8 EX DG
A couple of GB cards
Lumiquest Ultra Bounce
430EX Speedlite

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
brian_jackson
Junior Member
29 posts
Joined Dec 2005
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
     
Dec 28, 2005 23:24 |  #8

snapshot9670 wrote:
*Sigma zoom telephoto 70-300mm f/4-5.6

*I'm thinking for weddings I wouldn't really need that much zoom range, right?

Won't need that much? I don't think there is such a thing as too much reach. If the aperture were better on that lens I'd pick one up.

For weddings I use a 16-35mm f/2.8 or 17-40mm f/4.0 and a 70-200mm f/2.8 IS, with and without the 1.4x TC for 99% of the shots.


Brian Jackson Photo (external link)
My SportsShooter page (external link)
1DmkII, 1D, 20D, 40D, 17-40L, 70-200 f/2.8 IS L, 400 f/2.8 IS L, Sigma 15 f/2.8, 28 f/1.8, 50 f/1.4, 85 f/1.8, 1.4xII, 580EX, 550EX, 550EX, etc, etc.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
grego
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,819 posts
Joined May 2005
Location: UCLA
     
Dec 28, 2005 23:58 |  #9

The thing you really need to have if you are doing this for money is 2 bodies at least and 2-4 1gb cards. Another thing is a good flash with a quantum pack(eventually).

For portraits, your 85 1.8 will do well, especially if you have space to move.

For the unformal part, you want to have a mix like this....(trying to give you a wide variety of options)Generally, you want to have 3 ranges(wide,medium, telephoto).

A few wide angles(for group shots):
Tamron 17-35 f/2.8-4
Canon 17-40 f/4L
Canon 16-35L f/2.8L

Medium Zooms(for the most all purpose running around):
Canon 24-70 2.8L
Sigma 24-70 2.8
Canon 28-70 2.8L(although discontinued-but slightly less than the new 24-70)
Tamron 28-75 2.8

Telephoto zoom(sometimes you just can't get close, and you want this range)
Sigma 70-200 2.8
Canon 70-200 2.8L
Canon 70-200 2.8L IS

No use in getting the 300's since you really don't need that reach.


Go UCLA (external link)!! |Gear|http://gregburmann.com (external link)SportsShooter (external link)|Flickr (external link)|

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
snapshot9670
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
115 posts
Joined Dec 2005
Location: San Francisco, California
     
Dec 29, 2005 12:55 as a reply to  @ grego's post |  #10

Thanks again Grego!

I'll be sending back the 70-300mm and picking up a mid range (20-70 and semi long range lens 70-200mm).

AND I'm already on the hunt for that 2nd body :)

There just seems to be no gradual build up of the equipment in this business, is there? It's like you're "all in" (I love saying that. Yes, I've got the poker bug) or not.


Canon Rebel XT (Black)
Canon 50mm 1.8
Canon 85mm 1.8
Sigma 24-70 2.8 EX DG
A couple of GB cards
Lumiquest Ultra Bounce
430EX Speedlite

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SuzyView
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
32,073 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 117
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Northern VA
     
Dec 29, 2005 12:58 |  #11

Join the club. Good to hear you are hunting for the second body. Good hunting.

SuzyView


Suzie - Still Speaking Canonese!
5DIV, 7D2, SL1, G12, iPad Pro, iPhone 6P, 5 L's & 2 Primes, 25 bags.
My children are the reason, but it's the passion that drives me to get the perfect image of everything.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
50,935 posts
Likes: 339
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Dec 29, 2005 17:16 |  #12

You need a 24-70 type lens, you probably don't need a slow 300mm lens, and the 50mm F1.8 isn't good enough for professional work. Get fast lenses (F2.8 at least) so you can work in natural light. Primes are a pain for weddings, zooms are great. 2nd body is essential if you're paid for your services.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Zepher
Goldmember
Avatar
1,626 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2005
Location: Norfolk,VA
     
Dec 29, 2005 17:23 |  #13

My friends use the 24-70 and 17-40 L series lenses on thier 5D and 20D.
they did have the 75-300 IS lens that I have now but they never used it for weddings so they let me have it.
they use the Metz lights for thier flashes and it does a great job, and the camera attaches to it so you don't need one of those flash camera bracket things.


Manny Desantos
Intel C2Q Q6600 3.06Ghz, 8GB Ram, 8.1TB, XFX HD5850, Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit, PS CS4 EXT (external link)

Canon 40D, EF 28-70L, 2x Canon XH-A1 HDV, Canon HV30 HDV
❶_______________

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Point-n-shoot-n
Goldmember
1,690 posts
Likes: 287
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Tampa, Florida
     
Mar 30, 2018 23:13 |  #14

Just remember that you get what you pay for in a lens.....the faster the better and anything with an "L" in the name is always going to beat the crap out of a lesser lens for image quality. Save your coins and get a good lens when you can afford one!


Canon 5D mk IV, Canon 5D mk iii, Canon 5d classic, Rebel XTI 400D 18-55 kit lens, Canon EF 85mm 1:1.8, Canon EF 17-40 F4L, Quantaray 70-300 1:4-5.6 LD, Canon 70-200 F2.8 iiL, Canon EF135 F2 L, Canon 200 F2 L, Tamron 28-75 1:2.8 , 2 alien bee 800's, 430 EXii, 580 EXii, rectangular and octo softboxes, assorted umbrellas, portable backdrops, radio triggers and still adding.............

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Left ­ Handed ­ Brisket
That's my line!
Avatar
9,010 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Likes: 1941
Joined Jun 2011
Location: The Uwharrie Mts, NC
     
Mar 31, 2018 00:39 |  #15

Point-n-shoot-n wrote in post #18597415 (external link)
Just remember that you get what you pay for in a lens.....the faster the better and anything with an "L" in the name is always going to beat the crap out of a lesser lens for image quality. Save your coins and get a good lens when you can afford one!

Wonder if the OP saved enough money in the last 12 years for an L lens?


PSA: The above post may contain sarcasm, reply at your own risk | Not in gear database: Auto Sears 50mm 2.0 / 3x CL-360, Nikon SB-28, SunPak auto 322 D, Minolta 20

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

5,804 views & 1 like for this thread
Lenses - Which zoom lens?
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Visual Enjoyment Weddings & Other Family Events 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is pui1127
10958 guests, 254 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.