Can anyone tell me why you'd order the vastly inferior M-E over an M if the difference is 'only' 1.5k$?
Doesn't seem to make any sense.
Why would anyone choose a T4i over a 60D when the difference is only approx. $260? Why would anyone chose a 60D over a 7D when the difference is only approx. $500? And so and on. Same principles apply here as it does with the M-E and the M.
Also, if a person doesn't want/needs video or the other bells and whistles of the new M, why pay the extra for it?


