went to the park and snapped acouple of photos...!
hollyhock
by photocopys photos, on Flickr
borst home
by photocopys photos, on Flickr
photocopy Goldmember  1,555 posts Likes: 2 Joined Nov 2011 Location: PNW More info | Oct 05, 2012 15:52 | #1 went to the park and snapped acouple of photos...! hollyhock by photocopys photos, on Flickr borst home by photocopys photos, on Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 05, 2012 18:51 | #2 well dispite no comments i was very excited to try it out.... thanks for looking anyways....
LOG IN TO REPLY |
They look nice and sharp. I clicked on the images to see larger sizes on Flickr, but it says I don't have permission to view them. It might be helpful to let us see them on Flickr.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tawcat Senior Member  433 posts Joined Mar 2009 Location: Cammack Village, Arkansas More info | Very nice photos. I would wonder what the differences are over a SX40? Yes, a picture really is worth a thousand words!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ColinUK Member 149 posts Joined Oct 2007 Location: South London, UK More info | Oct 06, 2012 03:57 | #5 They look good! SX40, SX50.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 06, 2012 10:42 | #6 another flower from yesterday.. thank you Dennis for telling me how to make the pics bigger in Flicker....  orange flower by photocopys photos, on Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 06, 2012 11:04 | #7 Very very nice. A lot of good reports so far on the SX50.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Wish_Star Senior Member  292 posts Joined Dec 2010 More info | Oct 06, 2012 12:17 | #8 Very nice !!!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 06, 2012 12:53 | #9 these were JPG... i shot acouple in raw. but had to go into Coral Paintshop Pro 4x to see them.. i dont kmow what i didnt do right but they werent that good.. so deleted them... will play around today.. with the RAW
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Great photos, keep posting!!!! Sharon
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 06, 2012 21:59 | #11 photocopy wrote in post #15087420 these were JPG... i shot acouple in raw. but had to go into Coral Paintshop Pro 4x to see them.. i dont kmow what i didnt do right but they werent that good.. so deleted them... will play around today.. with the RAW Very nice colors and looking sharp. You should try the RAW editing software that came with the camera - DPP. I'm sure it would be better than PSP.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jon Cream of the Crop  69,628 posts Likes: 227 Joined Jun 2004 Location: Bethesda, MD USA More info | Oct 07, 2012 09:07 | #12 Digital Photo Pro is the very capable RAW developing software that Canon supplied with the SX50 (and every other camera that shoots RAW). What you saw was typical of a RAW image - the camera's LCD preview shows a JPEG thumbnail that's embedded in the RAW file, and applies the same settings that your camera's set to. Most applications' RAW processing doesn't understand the camera presets you use, so the RAW files may look "muddy" or "flat". The whole advantage of RAW is that you can increase (or reduce) contrast, saturation and sharpness as well as adjust exposure, white balance, tone curves and the like after the fact and without affecting the original digital negative. Jon
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Wish_Star Senior Member 292 posts Joined Dec 2010 More info | Oct 07, 2012 09:11 | #13 DPP 3.12 for RAW of SX50 HS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Wish_Star Senior Member 292 posts Joined Dec 2010 More info | Oct 07, 2012 09:18 | #14 Jon wrote in post #15090210 Digital Photo Pro is the very capable RAW developing software that Canon supplied with the SX50 (and every other camera that shoots RAW). What you saw was typical of a RAW image - the camera's LCD preview shows a JPEG thumbnail that's embedded in the RAW file, and applies the same settings that your camera's set to. Most applications' RAW processing doesn't understand the camera presets you use, so the RAW files may look "muddy" or "flat". The whole advantage of RAW is that you can increase (or reduce) contrast, saturation and sharpness as well as adjust exposure, white balance, tone curves and the like after the fact and without affecting the original digital negative. I have also tried and found that Digital Photo Pro is very slow and not very good color...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 07, 2012 10:39 | #15 thanks for the info.... On my T31 i use RAW 95% of the time.. and when I upload its not muted, flat as you mentioned.. i just find that very strange?? I will wait till CS upgrades for editing...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer 1336 guests, 109 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
