Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
POTN forums are closing 31.12.2023. Please see https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=1530921 and other posts in that thread for details.
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion People 
Thread started 10 Oct 2012 (Wednesday) 18:00
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Taking Group Shots: Best Settings?

 
missjenniferrae
Senior Member
Avatar
262 posts
Joined Feb 2011
Location: Connecticut
     
Oct 10, 2012 18:00 |  #1

Hello all!

I have been contracted by my sister's basketball team (a Division 1 program) to take their team photos, group photos, family photos, and head shots. It is my first really big/important shoot.

I am going to be purchasing the Canon 24-70 mm lens tomorrow. I currently have a Tamron 28-75 mm lens and I pretty much hate it, and it was time to upgrade.

What are some good settings/apertures to take group shots at so that a front row of people is not a different focus from a back row?

If anyone could also show any examples of groups that they took, that would be really great! (Especially if they are athletic groups!)


Which of my photographs is my favorite?
The one I'm going to take tomorrow
25. Connecticut. 50D
Sports & Lifestyle Photographer

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chris_holtmeier
Goldmember
Avatar
2,213 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 3014
Joined Sep 2011
Location: Omaha
     
Oct 10, 2012 18:05 |  #2

F8, and try to get yourself up on a ladder so you're shooting down on the group at an angle.



https://www.facebook.c​om/FotonFoto (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
missjenniferrae
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
262 posts
Joined Feb 2011
Location: Connecticut
     
Oct 10, 2012 18:24 |  #3

Good idea with the ladder! Especially seeing as one of the girls is 6'9"! And most of them are at least a few inches taller than me!

I will have to try some aperture/shutter speed/ISO combos when I get the lens, so I know some combos that will work ahead of time!

Thanks again


Which of my photographs is my favorite?
The one I'm going to take tomorrow
25. Connecticut. 50D
Sports & Lifestyle Photographer

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chokeslamcena
Member
108 posts
Joined Jan 2011
     
Oct 10, 2012 19:25 as a reply to  @ missjenniferrae's post |  #4

I don't know if I'd bother with a ladder in my honest opinion.

I realise they're girls, so you want them to look good, but they're also basketball players who are supposed to be 'larger than life' kind of characters. I'd be trying to shoot upwards at them whenever possible.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chris_holtmeier
Goldmember
Avatar
2,213 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 3014
Joined Sep 2011
Location: Omaha
     
Oct 10, 2012 19:48 |  #5

If you shoot upward at a large group, the people in back will be hidden.



https://www.facebook.c​om/FotonFoto (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
missjenniferrae
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
262 posts
Joined Feb 2011
Location: Connecticut
     
Oct 10, 2012 19:52 |  #6

I agree, that the upward angle might work on the individual shots, or the more casual shots, but not in the posed, formal shot. I will keep it in mind however, as a new perspective for some of the "fun" shots


Which of my photographs is my favorite?
The one I'm going to take tomorrow
25. Connecticut. 50D
Sports & Lifestyle Photographer

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chokeslamcena
Member
108 posts
Joined Jan 2011
     
Oct 10, 2012 21:36 |  #7

chris_holtmeier wrote in post #15105825 (external link)
If you shoot upward at a large group, the people in back will be hidden.

Not if the people on the front are kneeling, but you're right - It wouldn't look well.

What could work is to put the camera on the ground with a wide-angle lens and get everyone to crowd around it. I'm sure you've seen this done by the teenage girls on facebook who drop the camera and stand around in a circle over it, and it looks crap, but if you do it properly, it can look really well (in my opinion) and would add a lot of height/dominance in such a photo (basketball team).


But it's personal choice.


What I would say, OP, is make sure you get them all lined up in a single row (or two rows, if there's a lot of them. And get them to take turns coming forward in the group to you (about 10 foot in front of the group). Use a shallow depth of field and get that one person sharp with a blurry team behind him.

Rinse and repeat with every team player (so you have an individual shot of everyone that's the same, and the group/blurry jerseys are in the background.

It'll be tedious, but you may sell a few prints if you play your cards right.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
missjenniferrae
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
262 posts
Joined Feb 2011
Location: Connecticut
     
Oct 11, 2012 06:40 |  #8

chokeslamcena wrote in post #15106216 (external link)
Not if the people on the front are kneeling, but you're right - It wouldn't look well.

What could work is to put the camera on the ground with a wide-angle lens and get everyone to crowd around it. I'm sure you've seen this done by the teenage girls on facebook who drop the camera and stand around in a circle over it, and it looks crap, but if you do it properly, it can look really well (in my opinion) and would add a lot of height/dominance in such a photo (basketball team).


But it's personal choice.


What I would say, OP, is make sure you get them all lined up in a single row (or two rows, if there's a lot of them. And get them to take turns coming forward in the group to you (about 10 foot in front of the group). Use a shallow depth of field and get that one person sharp with a blurry team behind him.

Rinse and repeat with every team player (so you have an individual shot of everyone that's the same, and the group/blurry jerseys are in the background.

It'll be tedious, but you may sell a few prints if you play your cards right.

I really like the circle idea! I was thinking something like that, like the team mimicing their huddle. I also really like the idea of someone coming forward with the team as a background! Thanks so much!


Which of my photographs is my favorite?
The one I'm going to take tomorrow
25. Connecticut. 50D
Sports & Lifestyle Photographer

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PaulTopol
Member
89 posts
Joined Jan 2004
Location: Melbourne, Australia
     
Oct 11, 2012 13:12 |  #9

Take a look at this thread:
https://photography-on-the.net …/showthread.php​?t=1236548

I have given some ideas there.
Most important is Have Fun doing what you love.
Paul


1DX, 1d mk2, 24-70 2.8, 17-40L, 70-200 2.8, 50mm 1.4, 100-400, 28-135, 580ex2 and other odd lights including Elinchrom 1200 and 600. Very Lucky!
Everybody deserves "The Benefit of the Doubt" until proven otherwise.
Have a GREAT day!!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
stsva
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,363 posts
Gallery: 45 photos
Likes: 286
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Northern Virginia
     
Oct 11, 2012 13:36 |  #10

This online depth of field calculator will allow you to calculate a rough estimate of the depth of field for any given shooting distance, focal length, and aperture (adjust as needed to the type of camera you have):
http://www.dofmaster.c​om/dofjs.html (external link)


Some Canon stuff and a little bit of Yongnuo.
Member of the GIYF
Club and
HAMSTTR
٩ Breeders Club https://photography-on-the.net …=744235&highlig​ht=hamsttr Join today!
Image Editing OK

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
missjenniferrae
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
262 posts
Joined Feb 2011
Location: Connecticut
     
Oct 11, 2012 20:23 |  #11

Thank you everyone for steering me in the right directions!


Which of my photographs is my favorite?
The one I'm going to take tomorrow
25. Connecticut. 50D
Sports & Lifestyle Photographer

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
599XX
Member
46 posts
Joined Aug 2012
     
Oct 12, 2012 15:18 |  #12
bannedPermanent ban

6'9" you need a ladder.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,024 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
Taking Group Shots: Best Settings?
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion People 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2428 guests, 152 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.