http://www.adorama.com/ZI70200EFM.html?EmailPrice=T
Could this be $13,500 better than the Canon version? You're even giving up .1 of an f/stop!
irishman Goldmember  4,098 posts Likes: 14 Joined Jul 2007 Location: Scottsdale, AZ More info | Oct 11, 2012 17:02 | #1 http://www.adorama.com/ZI70200EFM.html?EmailPrice=T 6D, G9, Sigma 50 1.4, Sigma 15mm Fisheye, Sigma 50 2.8 macro, Nikon 14-24G 2.8, Canon 16-35 2.8 II, Canon 24-105 f/4 IS, Canon 70-200 2.8 IS, tripod, lights, other stuff.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
wimg Cream of the Crop  6,982 posts Likes: 209 Joined Jan 2007 Location: Netherlands, EU More info | Oct 11, 2012 17:11 | #2 irishman wrote in post #15109667 http://www.adorama.com/ZI70200EFM.html?EmailPrice=T Could this be $13,500 better than the Canon version? You're even giving up .1 of an f/stop! Nah, not actually giving up 0.1 of a stop - that's T-stop here, not F-stop. The Canon loses probably the same, maybe slightly more, if real transmission values are measured. EOS R & EOS 5 (analog) with a gaggle of primes & 3 zooms, OM-D E-M1 Mk II & Pen-F with 10 primes, 6 zooms, 3 Metabones adapters/speedboosters, and an accessory plague
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DreDaze happy with myself for not saying anything stupid  More info | Oct 11, 2012 17:15 | #3 i would think this would be more of it's competition than the 70-200f2.8 IS II Andre or Dre
LOG IN TO REPLY |
msowsun "approx 8mm"  More info | Oct 11, 2012 17:17 | #4 That is still a lot cheaper than Canon's Cinematic lenses: http://www.bhphotovideo.com …30_300mm_T2_95_3_7_L.html  Mike Sowsun / SL1 / 80D / EF-S 24mm STM / EF-S 10-18mm STM / EF-S 18-55mm STM / EF-S 15-85mm USM / EF-S 55-250mm STM / 5D3 / Samyang 14mm 2.8 / EF 40mm 2.8 STM / EF 50mm 1.4 USM / EF 100mm 2.0 USM / EF 100mm 2.8 USM Macro / EF 24-105mm IS / EF 70-200mm 2.8L IS Mk II / EF 100-400 II / EF 1.4x II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Fricks Cream of the Crop is, in fact, a title  More info | Oct 11, 2012 17:31 | #5 Ill take 2
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BrickR Cream of the Crop 5,935 posts Likes: 115 Joined Mar 2011 Location: Dallas TX More info | I assume this lens will drive you to your second or third job if you get it right? I'm sure that accounts for some of the price difference... My junk
LOG IN TO REPLY |
irishman THREAD STARTER Goldmember 4,098 posts Likes: 14 Joined Jul 2007 Location: Scottsdale, AZ More info | Oct 11, 2012 17:40 | #7 msowsun wrote in post #15109720 That is still a lot cheaper than Canon's Cinematic lenses: http://www.bhphotovideo.com …30_300mm_T2_95_3_7_L.html Price: $44,650.00 Oh, the Canon has this: "Geared Inner Focusing Reduces Breathing". That explains the price difference. 6D, G9, Sigma 50 1.4, Sigma 15mm Fisheye, Sigma 50 2.8 macro, Nikon 14-24G 2.8, Canon 16-35 2.8 II, Canon 24-105 f/4 IS, Canon 70-200 2.8 IS, tripod, lights, other stuff.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ontarian Member 34 posts Joined Apr 2011 Location: Ontario Canada More info | Oct 12, 2012 01:39 | #8 msowsun wrote in post #15109720 That is still a lot cheaper than Canon's Cinematic lenses: http://www.bhphotovideo.com …30_300mm_T2_95_3_7_L.html Price: $44,650.00 Makes the similar range and also manual focus but sub 800 dollar (upcoming EdMika EOS adaptable) 50-300 4.5L seem like a bargain  AV0H0471.jpg by Ontarian, on Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LowriderS10 Cream of the Crop  10,170 posts Likes: 12 Joined Mar 2008 Location: South Korea / Canada More info | Oct 12, 2012 08:59 | #9 Wow...18 rounded aperture blades...must be some buttery-smooth bokeh! -=Prints For Sale at PIXELS=-
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JohnThomas Senior Member  401 posts Joined May 2012 Location: Long Island, New York More info | Oct 12, 2012 09:12 | #11 LowriderS10 wrote in post #15112371 Wow...18 rounded aperture blades...must be some buttery-smooth bokeh! That's what I saw.. HOLY COW! You can call me JT
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JohnThomas Senior Member 401 posts Joined May 2012 Location: Long Island, New York More info | Oct 12, 2012 09:21 | #12 Ontarian - that 50-300 is an interesting lens. You can call me JT
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mike ugly when I'm sober  More info | Oct 12, 2012 09:25 | #13 irishman wrote in post #15109811 Oh, the Canon has this: "Geared Inner Focusing Reduces Breathing". That explains the price difference. And if I spent $44,650.00 on a lens I think my wife would reduce my breathing too... www.mikegreenphotography.co.uk
LOG IN TO REPLY |
wayne.robbins Goldmember 2,062 posts Joined Nov 2010 More info | Oct 12, 2012 20:51 | #14 Fricks wrote in post #15109770 Ill take 2 I'd consider taking two- but if I put it up on e-bay to sell it- even at 1/2 price, how many years do you think it would be till I get a taker ? EOS 5D III, EOS 7D,EOS Rebel T4i, Canon 70-200 f/2.8 IS II, Canon 24-105L, Canon 18-135 IS STM, 1.4x TC III, 2.0x TC III, Σ 50mm f/1.4, Σ 17-50 OS, Σ 70-200 OS, Σ 50-500 OS, Σ 1.4x TC, Σ 2.0x TC, 580EXII(3), Canon SX-40, Canon S100
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2872 guests, 175 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
.
