It's cheap because R&D has long been recouped and it's inexpensive to make. It's basically free money to Canon.
cdifoto Don't get pissy with me 34,092 posts Likes: 47 Joined Dec 2005 More info | Oct 12, 2012 15:13 | #16 It's cheap because R&D has long been recouped and it's inexpensive to make. It's basically free money to Canon. Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here
LOG IN TO REPLY |
drumsfield Goldmember 1,601 posts Likes: 27 Joined Oct 2009 Location: Bethesda Md More info | Oct 12, 2012 15:17 | #17 cdifoto wrote in post #15113985 It's cheap because R&D has long been recouped and it's inexpensive to make. It's basically free money to Canon. ...and add to that the fact the lens is made from .25 cents worth of plastic. They're making a killing selling it for $115. Canon 5D MkIII | Olympus OM-D | Olympus E-P2 | 16-35L MKII | 24-70L MKII | 70-200L MKII | 85L MKII | EF 50mm 1.4 | EF 100mm 2.8 | 100-400mm L MKII | 20mm 1.7
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DreDaze happy with myself for not saying anything stupid More info | Oct 12, 2012 15:38 | #18 isn't 50mm supposed to be the easiest lens to make to begin with? gonzogolf wrote in post #15113823 Drug dealers often give you the first hit of crack for free. Canon does a similar thing with prime lenses. ![]() Andre or Dre
LOG IN TO REPLY |
rang Goldmember 1,644 posts Likes: 6 Joined Jan 2007 More info | Oct 12, 2012 15:49 | #19 drumsfield wrote in post #15114004 ...and add to that the fact the lens is made from .25 cents worth of plastic. They're making a killing selling it for $115. Yeah...but it's the ONLY lens I've watched someone drop onto a concrete floor from between chest and waist high...explode like a repair manual parts diagram...get put back together on location...and continue to work like nothing happened. Lotsa stuff, running outta room and a wife...I keep looking at her and wondering???
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mwsilver Goldmember More info | Oct 12, 2012 15:59 | #20 The Dark Knight wrote in post #15113801 Still about $100 new street price. I believe the next cheapest new prime from Canon is the 35mm f/2 , and that's $200 more. And obviously the 50mm is a great bang for the buck. Is Canon willing to forego large profits on the 50mm to get people to buy it as a "gateway drug" into more expensive lenses down the line? Just based on build quality, no serious photographer would look at it twice. It looks and feels like a toy. But it has more than respectable image quality and it does it at f/1.8! That more than makes up fro the cheap body and noisy and slow focusing motor. Its one of the best deals in photography. And no on loses any sleep if it gets lost or breaks. Mark
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LowriderS10 Cream of the Crop 10,170 posts Likes: 12 Joined Mar 2008 Location: South Korea / Canada More info | Oct 12, 2012 17:34 | #21 Ummm...handle one. (Disclaimer...I LOVE the Nifty Fifty)..however...it's made of cheap plastic, it's the ONLY Canon lens to have a plastic mount for cryin' out loud, 5 bladed aperture, crappy AF motor, etc, etc... -=Prints For Sale at PIXELS=-
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 12, 2012 17:35 | #22 LowriderS10 wrote in post #15114596 Ummm...handle one. (Disclaimer...I LOVE the Nifty Fifty)..however...it's made of cheap plastic, it's the ONLY Canon lens to have a plastic mount for cryin' out loud, 5 bladed aperture, crappy AF motor, etc, etc... BTW, the next cheapest lens isn't the 35 f2, the next cheapest lens is the 40 f2.8 Pancake...at around $200, the Pancake's build is light years ahead of the Nifty. The Nifty feels like a toy. The Pancake feels like a quality piece of equipment in a tiny package. The Pancake is quite possibly one of the sharpest lenses Canon makes...even wide open the thing blows my mind every time I use it...I think it's much more amazing that Canon sells the Pancake for $200 than that it sells the Nifty for $110. Oh yea, forgot about the 40mm
LOG IN TO REPLY |
unistudent1962 Member 166 posts Likes: 1 Joined Sep 2010 Location: Brisbane QLD Australia More info | Oct 12, 2012 17:46 | #23 LowriderS10 wrote in post #15114596 it's the ONLY Canon lens to have a plastic mount for cryin' out loud No it's not. Canon 70D w/Grip l Canon 60D w/Grip l EF 100-400 F4.5-5.6L IS l EF 70-200 f4L IS l EF-S 15-85 f3.5-5.6 IS USM l EF 100mm f2.8 USM Macro l EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM l EF 50 f1.8 II l EF-S 10-22 f3.5-4.5 USM l 430 EX II Flash l Manfrotto 055XPROB + 498RC2 Tripod l Benro MP-96 M8 Monopod l Lowepro Vertex 200 AW Backpack l Lowepro Pro Runner 300 AW Backpack l PS CS5 Extended l Lightroom 4.3
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Canajun Goldmember 2,881 posts Likes: 3 Joined Dec 2008 Location: Sector ZZ9 Plural Z Alpha More info | Oct 12, 2012 18:00 | #24 The Dark Knight wrote in post #15113801 Still about $100 new street price. I believe the next cheapest new prime from Canon is the 35mm f/2 , and that's $200 more. And obviously the 50mm is a great bang for the buck. Is Canon willing to forego large profits on the 50mm to get people to buy it as a "gateway drug" into more expensive lenses down the line? No it's not. I can get a pancake 40mm for $190 Jun.Roberto.Dizon.Gregorio
LOG IN TO REPLY |
aegid Senior Member 506 posts Joined Apr 2011 More info | Oct 12, 2012 18:08 | #25 And you can use it as an impromptu macro lens! 5d3,17-40,24-105,24 1.4,85 1.4,70-200 2.8 is ii
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PepeGuitarra Senior Member 800 posts Joined Jul 2012 Location: Southern California More info | Oct 12, 2012 18:11 | #26 drumsfield wrote in post #15113972 It is basically a disposable lens. I once dropped on off a desk and it shattered into pieces. Fisher Price could've made a better quality lens. Drop the 85/1.2 at tell me what happens! It's not a photo until you print it!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Thorrulz Goldmember More info | Oct 12, 2012 18:49 | #27 I really chuckle at how many people say the 50 breaks when they drop it. I also take down their names so if I go to buy something later in the "Sell" section I know who to avoid. Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bubbygator I can't tell the difference 1,477 posts Gallery: 1 photo Likes: 63 Joined Feb 2011 Location: Sarasota, sunlight, butterflies, fish, Gators, and Seminoles More info | Oct 12, 2012 18:58 | #28 If the AF wasn't so flakey on moving things, I'd use mine. Gear List
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gjl711 Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill. 57,738 posts Likes: 4072 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Deep in the heart of Texas More info | Oct 12, 2012 19:05 | #29 Remember those little spy cameras they sold on the back of comic books? Well, the thrift 50 was the lens that came with them. Not sure why, but call me JJ.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LowriderS10 Cream of the Crop 10,170 posts Likes: 12 Joined Mar 2008 Location: South Korea / Canada More info | Oct 12, 2012 19:25 | #30 unistudent1962 wrote in post #15114634 No it's not. So does the 18-55, and I'm pretty sure there are others as well..... (Edit) 55-250 is another one. Ahhh...forgot about those two...it's been literally years since I've held an 18-55 haha. -=Prints For Sale at PIXELS=-
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2872 guests, 175 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||