My 100mm f/2.8L IS is SO VERY sharp and clear. It's such a great lens, I have a wonderful copy.
Is there a zoom that can produce equally sharp crisp quality? Is it the 70-200 2.8 II? Is it the 24-70 2.8 II? Is there another?
chuckmiller Goldmember More info | Oct 12, 2012 20:44 | #1 My 100mm f/2.8L IS is SO VERY sharp and clear. It's such a great lens, I have a wonderful copy. .
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tkbslc Cream of the Crop 24,604 posts Likes: 45 Joined Nov 2008 Location: Utah, USA More info | Oct 12, 2012 20:46 | #2 There are plenty of zooms that rival many primes, but generally the best primes beat the best zooms. It's just a matter of a lens designer being able to concentrate on perfection at 1 focal length rather than having to find the best compromise between a range of focal lengths. Taylor
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jcpoulin Goldmember 2,447 posts Likes: 13 Joined Jun 2006 Location: Massachusetts More info | Oct 12, 2012 20:53 | #3 Is there a prime that can produce equally sharp crisp pictures at focal lengths other than it's stated focal length......it's all about convenience! There is always a give and take. Although, the 70-200II will rival many primes!! 1DX , 7D,16-35, 24-70 2.8II, 2.8L II, , 70-200 f2.8LII IS, 300 f2.8L IS, 500 f4 IS, 100-400L, Canon 100 2.8 macro, Canon 1.4X, 580ex, AB800X4
LOG IN TO REPLY |
AlbertNam Senior Member 393 posts Joined May 2011 Location: Shrewsbury, MA More info | Oct 12, 2012 21:44 | #4 |
msowsun "approx 8mm" More info | Oct 12, 2012 21:50 | #5 Albert Nam wrote in post #15115402 I think that the 24-70L II and 70-200L IS II are the only zooms that can really give primes a run for their money. But even then, the zooms cannot reach below f/2.8. In addition to those two, the EF 70-200mm 4.0 IS, EF-S 17-55mm 2.8 IS, and EF-S 15-85mm IS are also three zooms that, in my opinion, are near perfect. Mike Sowsun / SL1 / 80D / EF-S 24mm STM / EF-S 10-18mm STM / EF-S 18-55mm STM / EF-S 15-85mm USM / EF-S 55-250mm STM / 5D3 / Samyang 14mm 2.8 / EF 40mm 2.8 STM / EF 50mm 1.4 USM / EF 100mm 2.0 USM / EF 100mm 2.8 USM Macro / EF 24-105mm IS / EF 70-200mm 2.8L IS Mk II / EF 100-400 II / EF 1.4x II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DustinMustangs Senior Member 310 posts Joined Dec 2008 Location: MI More info | Oct 12, 2012 21:56 | #6 My 70-200 f4 is considerably sharper than my (non L) 100mm macro. 60D | 15-85 3.5-5.6 IS | 70-200 4L | 50 1.8 | 100 2.8 macro | 1.4x II | 580EX | 430EX II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
1Tanker Goldmember 4,470 posts Likes: 8 Joined Jan 2011 Location: Swaying to the Symphony of Destruction More info | Oct 12, 2012 22:01 | #7 Dustin Mustangs wrote in post #15115448 My 70-200 f4 is considerably sharper than my (non L) 100mm macro. My 100 (non-L) macro is soooo much sharper then my 70-200/4L IS.. at f/2.8. Kel
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RPCrowe Cream of the Crop More info | This is an argument.... See my images at http://rpcrowe.smugmug.com/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2765 guests, 179 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||