Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 13 Oct 2012 (Saturday) 06:33
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

The kind of pics I take, what am I doing wrong ?

 
platforminc
Member
80 posts
Joined Feb 2012
     
Oct 13, 2012 06:33 |  #1

Hi All,

Below are the kind of pictures I usually take, groups of people in challangeing light conditions, I use my 430ex external flash, but I dont feel my pictures have a wow factor. I have not done any touchups, not like i'm very good at it. This was taken at night, at a hall and the one with the curtain was taken indoors at night as well, no ambient light and flash bounced off the ceiling.

Group of people, bounced off ceiling @ night

IMAGE: http://zenet.co.uk/images/G1.jpg

Same picture
IMAGE: http://zenet.co.uk/images/G2.jpg

I was using my Tamron 17-50 VC lens for all the pictures. I'm doing a similar shoot this weekend for a childrens party.


Tried to make the right the main point here.
IMAGE: http://zenet.co.uk/images/G3.jpg


A get together, big hall, high ceiling and flash facing up.
IMAGE: http://zenet.co.uk/images/G4.jpg

Camera: Canon 500D, f1.8 50mm, kit lens, Tamron 17-50 f2.8 VC, 430EX flash, Remote control,Tripod, Cleaning kit.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gibbit1
Goldmember
Avatar
1,658 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Jul 2009
Location: Valdese, nc
     
Oct 13, 2012 06:41 |  #2

Flash bounced off the ceiling won't really give you the correct lighting pattern. To get a good lighting pattern, you need to get the flash off the camera using a radio trigger. Also, a light modifier (umbrella or softbox) will help a lot.

That being said, I don't find these images to be all that bad. You had a boring background, and the posing isn't great, but still not bad. You could try playing with the curves adjustments and see if you can get more out of these.

I hope this is at least semi-helpful.


"Everything will be alright. I'm from the government and I'm here to help."
Gear: EOS 5DMKII; EOS 400D (infrared converted); Canon 24-105mm f/4 L; Sigma 17-35mm f/2.8-4 EX; Canon 70-200mm f/4 L; Canon 135mm f/2.0 L; Pentax SMC Takumar 50mm f/1.4 with EOS adaptor, Rokinon 14mm f/2.8; only enough knowledge to be a clear and present danger to society.
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
platforminc
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
80 posts
Joined Feb 2012
     
Oct 13, 2012 06:47 |  #3

Thanks for the post, however I was at a wedding a few weeks ago, the pro photographer didnt have to carry out a softbox or umbrella, main thing he had that I didnt was a full frame camera and superior set of lens.

What is a radio trigger and what will it do for me, do you mean standing the camera on a tripod ? Is there like a small softbox that can spread the light and can fit in a small bag. Can I find it on eb*Y ?

Lastly, If I am taking shots, I can direct my subject to change pose, do you have some tips ?

Thanks.


Camera: Canon 500D, f1.8 50mm, kit lens, Tamron 17-50 f2.8 VC, 430EX flash, Remote control,Tripod, Cleaning kit.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Qbx
Goldmember
3,983 posts
Gallery: 52 photos
Likes: 545
Joined Dec 2010
     
Oct 13, 2012 06:49 |  #4

I agree with gibbit - they're not bad. But since you are the photog, you can suggest that they pose against a better background - half a curtain doesn't work well. In #2 you focused on the guy camera left so the people camera right are soft. In the last one you might clean the table a bit - especially the beer bottle by cloning, then crop out the cans.


-- Image Editing OK --

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
platforminc
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
80 posts
Joined Feb 2012
     
Oct 13, 2012 07:58 |  #5

Thanks for the post, really useful. I have always been very critical of myself. Regarding the focus thing, I was using spot metering, but is it true that spot metering is useful for only single portraits. Please advice where I should stick to spot metering for group shots or rather the evaluate option.

Thanks


Camera: Canon 500D, f1.8 50mm, kit lens, Tamron 17-50 f2.8 VC, 430EX flash, Remote control,Tripod, Cleaning kit.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rioni
Goldmember
1,547 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 355
Joined Jul 2010
Location: 127.0.0.1
     
Oct 13, 2012 08:44 |  #6

http://neilvn.com …ck-foamie-thing/?vm=r&s=1 (external link)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jack ­ lumber
Goldmember
Avatar
1,105 posts
Likes: 9
Joined Mar 2006
Location: southern alberta.
     
Oct 13, 2012 14:43 |  #7

platforminc wrote in post #15116468 (external link)
Thanks for the post, however I was at a wedding a few weeks ago, the pro photographer didnt have to carry out a softbox or umbrella, main thing he had that I didnt was a full frame camera and superior set of lens.

What is a radio trigger and what will it do for me, do you mean standing the camera on a tripod ? Is there like a small softbox that can spread the light and can fit in a small bag. Can I find it on eb*Y ?

Lastly, If I am taking shots, I can direct my subject to change pose, do you have some tips ?

Thanks.

Op said
main thing he had that I didnt was a full frame camera and superior set of lens.

Full frame and L glass, are only part of the equation. I have seen better shots taken with a pinhole camera, than I can achieve with high end gear.


There is a fine line between "hobby" and "obsession"
---------------
5D-20D-7D gripped- all canon-28MM 1.8 - 50MM 1.8 -17-40 L -100MM 2.8 macro -70-200MM L F4- 100-40MM L -1X4 teleconverter-Sigma 20-40MM 2.8:D 580 EX 11 flash- manfrotto tripods and monopods.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CameraMan
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
13,366 posts
Gallery: 28 photos
Likes: 811
Joined Dec 2010
Location: In The Sticks
     
Oct 13, 2012 14:56 |  #8

I agree, Not bad photos at all. I think a couple have some focus issues. You may have had the aperture wide open. That causes focus issues when focusing close up like that.

The ring shot, You cut off the tip of her finger and she has no thumb. Looks kinda weird. Next time try pulling back a bit to get the whole hand in there.

That last shot is pretty good. I would bring down the exposure just a tad and crop out whatever that is that's blurred on the very edge of the left side. Someones hand maybe?

As far as bouncing the flash I think you have the right idea. Next time try bouncing it off a wall behind you or to your right or left and see what that does.


Photographer (external link) | The Toys! | Video (external link) | Flickr (external link)
Shampoo sounds like an unfortunate name for a hair product.
You're a ghost driving a meat-coated skeleton made from stardust, riding a rock, hurtling through space. Fear Nothing!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gibbit1
Goldmember
Avatar
1,658 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Jul 2009
Location: Valdese, nc
     
Oct 13, 2012 17:09 |  #9

platforminc wrote in post #15116468 (external link)
Thanks for the post, however I was at a wedding a few weeks ago, the pro photographer didnt have to carry out a softbox or umbrella, main thing he had that I didnt was a full frame camera and superior set of lens.

What is a radio trigger and what will it do for me, do you mean standing the camera on a tripod ? Is there like a small softbox that can spread the light and can fit in a small bag. Can I find it on eb*Y ?

Lastly, If I am taking shots, I can direct my subject to change pose, do you have some tips ?

Thanks.

Well, first of all, don't try and learn everything at once. A full-frame camera won't make any difference, so save your money. Read a few books on posing and lighting, and you'll start improving quickly.

Radio triggers are just what they sound like, they trigger your flash with a radio signal, so that the flash can be off of the camera. The cheap ones do not transmit the E-TTL data, so you'll have to use your flash in manual mode. This is a good thing, as using manual mode will help you learn. You can find some here: http://www.amazon.com …wboy+studio+rad​io+trigger (external link)

Softbox umbrellas are a cheap and effective way to diffuse your flash. You can find some here: http://www.amazon.com …keywords=softbo​x+umbrella (external link)

As for posing, that's really the hard part for me, and I think for most of us. You need to learn the basics of visual design (line, form, shape, etc.) and try to incorporate those into your poses. Lots of books on that, too.

Hope this helps.


"Everything will be alright. I'm from the government and I'm here to help."
Gear: EOS 5DMKII; EOS 400D (infrared converted); Canon 24-105mm f/4 L; Sigma 17-35mm f/2.8-4 EX; Canon 70-200mm f/4 L; Canon 135mm f/2.0 L; Pentax SMC Takumar 50mm f/1.4 with EOS adaptor, Rokinon 14mm f/2.8; only enough knowledge to be a clear and present danger to society.
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
NinjaKix
Member
Avatar
137 posts
Gallery: 18 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 81
Joined Mar 2012
     
Oct 13, 2012 19:56 |  #10

The 1st 2 are what they are...I cant think of a way to make that kind of picture setup any better. It's in a house, w/ no interesting backdrop and a group photo.

The 3rd is just not composed as good as it could have been. Hand dead center and again, in a house w/ no interesting background

4, set exposure for the background and adjust the flash for your subject. IMO, It would have been much better w/ a darker background.

Overall, you did what you could w/ what you had and I dont find these to be bad at all.


[Nikon D810] [Nikon 24-70 f/2.8] [Nikon 70-200 f/2.8] [Nikon 85 f/1.4] [Einstein E640's]
Like me on Instagram (external link)
See my flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
platforminc
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
80 posts
Joined Feb 2012
     
Oct 13, 2012 20:09 |  #11

Guys

Everyone has mentioned focus issue, but I still want to understand because of next time. I can see that the second pic was sharp to the left but lost sharpness when you look at subjects to the right. For group shots like this, should I focus on the middle subject next time ?

Thanks


Camera: Canon 500D, f1.8 50mm, kit lens, Tamron 17-50 f2.8 VC, 430EX flash, Remote control,Tripod, Cleaning kit.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Titus213
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
19,403 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 36
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Kalama, WA USA
     
Oct 13, 2012 20:59 |  #12

The images don't look too bad at all.

I would take a different approach here. First I wouldn't buy any more equipment until I had what I owned figured out.

First - focus. If you are shooting a group of people you either have to pose them in a straight line or use an f-stop sufficient to keep them all in acceptable focus. Lots of things make up DOF - check it out here - http://www.dofmaster.c​om/dofjs.html (external link)

Next, flash photography - two exposures in one shot. I use manual mode on the camera and ETTL on the flash. Set the camera to expose the background as best I can, bringing in ambient light in a room as much as possible. Let the flash fill the subject - you can adjust the flash exposure separately with FEC - flash exposure compensation. And you can bounce the flash off the ceiling, wall, or both from a corner. Flash straight on to a person's face generally doesn't look as good as light coming from the side. I also use a simple bounce card on the flash head - I'm still using a Lumiquest ProMax system. Lots of folks still use a simple 3x5 card rubber banded to the flash head.


Dave
Perspiring photographer.
Visit NorwoodPhotos.comexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Krzysztof
Member
Avatar
124 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 5
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Denver Colorado
     
Oct 13, 2012 21:33 |  #13

In the group shots, your flash exposure is fine but your image is flat. For natural looking photos you should bump up your ISO to get into the ambient light zone. You should also work on peoples expressions, for that you have to be charming and interact with them. Dial in your settings before you start shooting people, than forget about your settings, and find a way to make them smile.


My tools: 1Ds ii, 135L, 85L, 85 f/1.8, 50 f/1.4, 24-70 f/2.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CameraMan
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
13,366 posts
Gallery: 28 photos
Likes: 811
Joined Dec 2010
Location: In The Sticks
     
Oct 14, 2012 06:52 |  #14

platforminc wrote in post #15118651 (external link)
Guys

Everyone has mentioned focus issue, but I still want to understand because of next time. I can see that the second pic was sharp to the left but lost sharpness when you look at subjects to the right. For group shots like this, should I focus on the middle subject next time ?

Thanks

One thing to do when taking group shots it don't go wider than f/8 with the aperture. You tend to get those OOF areas when you go wider. Boost up the flash power if you have to for more light.


Photographer (external link) | The Toys! | Video (external link) | Flickr (external link)
Shampoo sounds like an unfortunate name for a hair product.
You're a ghost driving a meat-coated skeleton made from stardust, riding a rock, hurtling through space. Fear Nothing!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
johndoorley
Senior Member
364 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Jan 2011
     
Oct 14, 2012 08:31 |  #15

The shots are ok, you have chosen one of the more challanging mixes to light, people with dark chocolate skin tones and people with very pale white skin.

a couple things to try:
get an inexpensive diffuser (or an expensive one for more flexability)
and a flash bracket with a cord to get the flash furrther off the camera.
now without spending extra cash:
your 430 ex has a bounce card built in, so while bouncing off the ceiling, pull up the flash card to push a bit of extra light forward and increase the catch light in the eyes.

I would also try shooting a little lower, there seems to be a lot of extra headroom.

a coupe of posing thoughts:
first photo - have the 2 end guys go down on one knee in front of the others
photo 2 - put the guys behind the girls
photo 3 - have her drape her hand over something, perhaps one of the gentlemans arms
photo 4 - perhaps have them sit just a bith further apart and tip their heads toward one another.

For focus, try going to center point focus, point the camera to the point you want to focus on , pull trigger halfway and hold, then reframe and shoot.

As Titus mentioned look into depth of field. You can practice/experiment with 3 or 4 helium baloons with weighted strings, you can place them like you would place people and at the correct height for faces. I would use the latex baloons - they won't last as long as the mylar but there will be less reflection issues. Also get some light and dark colored baloons. You can also tape some small pieces of paper with print on it to each balloon to be able to see how your focus is falling.


I do not know what mode you are shooting in, but you may want to look at one of the program modes .

Remember - the more comfortable you are with your equipment, meaning that you have shot enough to be pretty sure what settings to use to get the effect you want, the more time and effort you can spend on posing and talking with your subject.

Hope this was what you were looking for.
Keep up the good work, and enjoy shooting.

-John




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,661 views & 0 likes for this thread, 16 members have posted to it.
The kind of pics I take, what am I doing wrong ?
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer
1344 guests, 131 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.