EOS M Owners Post Your Pictures

jdickerson wrote in post #16813600
If I understand what you're saying you're wrong, the aperture doesn't change with the 1.6 crop factor, only the focal length. In this case the focal length would be 136mm as you state but the f/stop would remain f/0.85.

JD

But the effect of the f0.85 would be like f1.35 on 1.6x crop. Because the larger sensor allows use of a higher ISO with same noise and shallower DOF, using f1.35 on FF would produce roughly the same result as f0.85 on 1.6x crop.

For example, ISO 3200 at 1.0 on 1.6x crop and ISO 5000 at f1.6 on FF are going to have about the same DOF and Noise. So you really do end up with a crop factor on aperture, too.

Andre and Taylor,

You're probably both right, I just didn't read it that way. In which case, that's a bunch of money for a lens that gives (essentially) the same results as the 50 f/1.4. And if it's the same one I saw a photo of, it's huge. Not something I'd want to put on an M anyway.

I guess if one is a dedicated "available darkness" shooter things are different.

JD

Love the M for what it is, and it's always super simple to pull out and shoot.

Finally adding prints to my wall.

IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/mQKt​ZC

CJCMarquez wrote in post #16814206
Love the M for what it is, and it's always super simple to pull out and shoot.

Finally adding prints to my wall.

IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/mQKt​ZC

Chad,

Where are you getting your work printed?

freitz wrote in post #16814476
Chad,

Where are you getting your work printed?

This are glass prints called fractures.

Check out fractureme.com

Took the M on a very short trip to Joshua Tree, and by short I mean literately 15 minutes from camera out of the car to camera back in the car.
Next time I go I plan on staying at least 4-6 hours.

I live in the city where on a good night you see maybe 6-9 stars so seeing this many in person was just breathtaking.

Started off at F2.5 ISO 5,000 15 seconds, but I could see noticeable trails

So I pushed the 22mm lens to it's boundary at 2.0 and 13 seconds.

It was my very first attempt at shooting stars.

IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/mRjJ​QT

IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/mRjE​5c

IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/mRmf​ZQ

IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/mRjA​bZ

maverick75 wrote in post #16815086
Took the M on a very short trip to Joshua Tree, and by short I mean literately 15 minutes from camera out of the car to camera back in the car.
Next time I go I plan on staying at least 4-6 hours.

I live in the city where on a good night you see maybe 6-9 stars so seeing this many in person was just breathtaking.

Started off at F2.5 ISO 5,000 15 seconds, but I could see noticeable trails

So I pushed the 22mm lens to it's boundary at 2.0 and 13 seconds.

It was my very first attempt at shooting stars.

IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/mRjJ​QT

IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/mRjE​5c

IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/mRmf​ZQ

IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/mRjA​bZ

Nice.

Couple from a recent ski trip:

HI,

I am seeing very nice images in this thread..... Well done everyone......

with the M back at canon for the 2nd time but they are keeping it much longer this time which means they are actually doing something instead of just sending it back. Hopefully I hear back within the week.

CJCMarquez wrote in post #16815017
This are glass prints called fractures.

Check out fractureme.com

Very cool concept. I placed an order with them today.

tmalone893 wrote in post #16820068
Very cool concept. I placed an order with them today.

Yeah should have thanks CJ I did that same.

Another one from Bryce Canyon with the M and the 11-22mm...

tmalone893 wrote in post #16820068
Very cool concept. I placed an order with them today.

freitz wrote in post #16820071
Yeah should have thanks CJ I did that same.

For sure! Good time to order with the 30% off too!