EOS M Owners Post Your Pictures

Fun with my EOS M. The EFM 22mm f2 felt too small, so I tried on my 70-200 f2.8L.

Liked a little "M" guy a lot, kit lens 22mm STM is not bad, but worth to get an EF adapter for other Canon lenses:
Autumn is not thing much around here, other than foliage (aka bunch of dead leaf

IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …/66864702@N00/8​205222164/

IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …/66864702@N00/8​205222568/

IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …/66864702@N00/8​205222394/

IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …/66864702@N00/8​205222276/

With 300 f/2.8 IS and adapter

my portrait set up

I'm liking the ethos of this camera and am seriously considering getting one to replace my Leica as my 'chuck it in your pocket for those unexpected opportunities' camera, but reports of a naff AF system are putting me off. How are you guys finding it in this respect?

Sorarse wrote in post #15289955
I'm liking the ethos of this camera and am seriously considering getting one to replace my Leica as my 'chuck it in your pocket for those unexpected opportunities' camera, but reports of a naff AF system are putting me off. How are you guys finding it in this respect?

The AF accuracy is not in question, but the speed is a bit slower than a dslr, but it's not a restriction in most circumstances other than sport. It's not that slow from my point of view, you just need better technique, that is where to place the focusing point.

The native ef-m lenses are faster than the adaptor and older EF lens designs, but the new ones such as the 70-300L are as fast as the ef-m.

nero_design wrote in post #15290829

Two friends at Hooters Parramatta (Desiree & A.J.) ... Taken with the EOS-M + EF 135mm f/2.0L USM lens (no flash)
Composition is poor because I was backed up against the window with this lens.

Are those "friends" like how strippers say they are your "friend"? until you run out of money.... haha

Just messing around. Nice shots brotha.

Sorarse wrote in post #15289955
I'm liking the ethos of this camera and am seriously considering getting one to replace my Leica as my 'chuck it in your pocket for those unexpected opportunities' camera, but reports of a naff AF system are putting me off. How are you guys finding it in this respect?

Perfectly accurate, however auto-focus speed takes 0.5 - 1 sec depending on lens and focus point. About the same as a point-and-shoot camera (same speed as my 3-year old Canon D10). The pictures you see posted here actually give a better indication of the type of shooting you can do with the camera (notice no fast action shots).

rinthiran wrote in post #15291299
Perfectly accurate, however auto-focus speed takes 0.5 - 1 sec depending on lens and focus point. About the same as a point-and-shoot camera (same speed as my 3-year old Canon D10). The pictures you see posted here actually give a better indication of the type of shooting you can do with the camera (notice no fast action shots).

Great input. Action is not going to happen. However, street shooting and action of that sort can be revived with the Magic Lantern's focus peaking, which will make MF possible [accurately] It's in the works as we speak.

On an ethos level, you are right, this camera fills all needs. To top it off, it will be a good system to invest in, because when it grows, you don't have to switch over ;]

Quick question, does anyone know if Canon is planning on releasing a faster prime for the M? I want to get the EOS-M with the 22mm, but not sure if the ISO on the M will allow f/2 to be fast enough.