Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 19 Oct 2012 (Friday) 20:38
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Will it print?

 
Smitty2k1
Member
Avatar
224 posts
Gallery: 22 photos
Likes: 33
Joined Mar 2012
Location: Washington DC
     
Oct 19, 2012 20:38 |  #1

Hey everyone, I'm looking to print the following photo at 24"x36"... I've already got a frame.

Unfortunately, this photo I took has already been cropped, is handheld, and a bit noisy. Before I spend the $35 on the print (through Smugmug - I've had great results in the past) I wanted to get some feedback.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


and you can view the full resolution image at my site below:
http://panamapat.smugm​ug.com …276339&k=2KNJN9​L&lb=1&s=O (external link)

Thanks!



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
stock28
Senior Member
499 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Likes: 16
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Illinois
     
Oct 19, 2012 22:37 |  #2

Depends on what you consider acceptable. Is it a raw file? You could probably clean up some of the noise if it is. It is a nice shot.


7D, 70-200 L f4 non IS, 100 macro 2.8, 50 1.8, 18-55 kit

FlickR (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Redcrown
Senior Member
351 posts
Likes: 47
Joined Dec 2008
     
Oct 19, 2012 23:41 |  #3

It is a bit noisy, but a 24x36 print will most likely be viewed from 3' or greater, so you would not notice the noise. However, I downloaded the original and applied some moderate noise reduction and thought it took very well, without any degradation in sharpness. So I'd recommend a little noise reduction before printing.

At 24x36 you will get 130ppi. That's a bit low, but acceptable at the +3 foot viewing distance. Given the quality of the image I would recommend printing at that ppi instead of trying to uprez. Uprezing will amplify the noise and softness that is already there.

If you are going to invest in such a prominent print, I'd recommend a few tweaks first.

1. Try to knock down the burned out highlights in the window behind the cockpit and the floor under the plane. Try a Levels adjustment, and simply slide the white "output level" slider (not the histogram sliders) to the left. Add a black mask and then roughly paint in the adjustment with soft brush.

2. Clone out the bright sections on the top left (above and below the catwalks). I grabbed a section of the gray squares from the right of the plane and transformed, patched, and masked them in the one section behind the man on the catwalk. Looked good. Just cloning the other small section from the dark area above it is OK.

3. Clone out the spotlights on the middle catwalk.

4. Increase the overall contrast. You already have clipped blacks in the catwalks and engine cowling, but that's OK. But a little more darkening of the background and a litte brightening of the golden "V" on the plane nose makes the image more dramatic.

5. If you are really ambitious, you might try to clone out the windows behind the cockpit instead of using Levels to darken them. That big white area in the middle of the image is a major distraction. Cloning would be difficult and time consuming, trying to borrow from the roof section above the windows, but might be worth it.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tzalman
Fatal attraction.
Avatar
13,497 posts
Likes: 213
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Gesher Haziv, Israel
     
Oct 20, 2012 06:33 |  #4

At 24x36 you will get 130ppi. That's a bit low, but acceptable at the +3 foot viewing distance. Given the quality of the image I would recommend printing at that ppi instead of trying to uprez. Uprezing will amplify the noise and softness that is already there.

That, unfortunately, is impossible. You can upload it at its present dimensions, but Smugmug's RIP will uprez it to meet the requirements of their printer, maybe 250 ppi but more likely 300 ppi.

There is nothing wrong with letting Smugmug do it, they will undoubtably do a good job, but the control freaks among us (I'm one of them) will prefer to do it themselves. At any rate, you can see an approximate preview of how it will look by cropping out an important and representative section and saving it as a tif. Then enlarge it by 2.3X (if your crop is 600x900 make it 1380x2070) and sharpen it a bit. Next, assuming your monitor is around 100 ppi, view it at 33% (1:3) and stand back from the screen. This will give you a rough idea of how your 24x36 inch print will look.


Elie / אלי

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Smitty2k1
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
224 posts
Gallery: 22 photos
Likes: 33
Joined Mar 2012
Location: Washington DC
     
Oct 20, 2012 07:53 |  #5

Thanks for all the input everyone!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FeXL
Senior Member
493 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Dec 2007
     
Oct 20, 2012 10:36 as a reply to  @ Smitty2k1's post |  #6

I'm finding the BG extremely busy. In addition to the above suggested darkening, I'd do some blurring.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Smitty2k1
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
224 posts
Gallery: 22 photos
Likes: 33
Joined Mar 2012
Location: Washington DC
     
Oct 21, 2012 12:24 |  #7

Here is my edit all done in LR
-blurred background (-100 sharpness adjustment brush)
-reduced highlights slider to -100 and whites slider to -100
-increased contrast (it's at 45 right now)
-decreased local exposure on spot lights on walkway next to the cockpit (adjustment brush)
-applied noise reduction (45 luminance, 60 detail, 30 contrast)

What do you guys think? I think it looks a bit better but I do think it could use some more background blur - I'm just not sure how to achieve this in LR beyond what I've done

Before:

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

After:
IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

View full resolution on new edit:
http://panamapat.smugm​ug.com …270878&k=cRDFWK​z&lb=1&s=O (external link)



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Redcrown
Senior Member
351 posts
Likes: 47
Joined Dec 2008
     
Oct 21, 2012 12:43 |  #8

For the background blur using Lightroom only, try some negative clarity instead of negative sharpness.

Pesonally, I prefer the original contrast everywhere but where highlights are blown out.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,447 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4538
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Oct 21, 2012 12:44 |  #9

OP, you need to change your POTN profile to have 'Image editing OK'. I did some changes and have some crops of a small area, to show the benefit of denoise, unsharp mask, and then upres of the photo, with additional digital camera noise reduction, but I won't post any of the examples until you alter your profile suitably.


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
René ­ Damkot
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
39,856 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Feb 2005
Location: enschede, netherlands
     
Oct 22, 2012 06:25 |  #10

Redcrown wrote in post #15150182 (external link)
Personally, I prefer the original contrast everywhere but where highlights are blown out.

I prefer the original overall, except maybe for the floor. The -100 highlights adds contrast to the few things that aren't blown in the window, making them stand out even more…


"I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
Why Color Management.
Color Problems? Click here.
MySpace (external link)
Get Colormanaged (external link)
Twitter (external link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,447 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4538
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Oct 22, 2012 13:40 |  #11

OP, aren't you curious about 100% crop sections of the image, and how much improvement I could obtain in your photo? Update your profile to 'Image Editing OK' and I can post examples while remaining compliant with POTN regs.


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Smitty2k1
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
224 posts
Gallery: 22 photos
Likes: 33
Joined Mar 2012
Location: Washington DC
     
Oct 22, 2012 19:44 |  #12

Wilt wrote in post #15154835 (external link)
OP, aren't you curious about 100% crop sections of the image, and how much improvement I could obtain in your photo? Update your profile to 'Image Editing OK' and I can post examples while remaining compliant with POTN regs.

Sorry - long day at work!
I've made the change

Everyone else thanks for the feedback! It looks like I have a lot more editing to do :)

"I am but an egg"




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,447 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4538
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Oct 22, 2012 19:47 |  #13

Here is 100% crop of the original image

IMAGE: http://i69.photobucket.com/albums/i63/wiltonw/original.jpg

And here is a denoised image
IMAGE: http://i69.photobucket.com/albums/i63/wiltonw/denoised.jpg

And here is the image upres'd by 200% (so it prints better at large size), then denoised
IMAGE: http://i69.photobucket.com/albums/i63/wiltonw/upresanddenoised.jpg

You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BobG
Member
205 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 4
Joined Jul 2009
Location: Cucamonga, California
     
Oct 22, 2012 23:51 |  #14

Redcrown wrote in post #15145489 (external link)
If you are going to invest in such a prominent print, I'd recommend a few tweaks first.

1. Try to knock down the burned out highlights in the window behind the cockpit and the floor under the plane. Try a Levels adjustment, and simply slide the white "output level" slider (not the histogram sliders) to the left. Add a black mask and then roughly paint in the adjustment with soft brush.

2. Clone out the bright sections on the top left (above and below the catwalks). I grabbed a section of the gray squares from the right of the plane and transformed, patched, and masked them in the one section behind the man on the catwalk. Looked good. Just cloning the other small section from the dark area above it is OK.

3. Clone out the spotlights on the middle catwalk.


5. If you are really ambitious, you might try to clone out the windows behind the cockpit instead of using Levels to darken them. That big white area in the middle of the image is a major distraction. Cloning would be difficult and time consuming, trying to borrow from the roof section above the windows, but might be worth it.

This is a quick edit. It could be better with more effort and somebody more skilled.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2012/10/4/LQ_620563.jpg
Image hosted by forum (620563) © BobG [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

T2i & 30D 50mm1.8II 18-200mm IS 18-55mm IS 430EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BobG
Member
205 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 4
Joined Jul 2009
Location: Cucamonga, California
     
Oct 23, 2012 00:23 as a reply to  @ BobG's post |  #15

Here is another edit.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2012/10/4/LQ_620571.jpg
Image hosted by forum (620571) © BobG [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

T2i & 30D 50mm1.8II 18-200mm IS 18-55mm IS 430EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,521 views & 0 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it.
Will it print?
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ealarcon
1046 guests, 141 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.