Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 19 Oct 2012 (Friday) 21:35
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Strange Question I know, but...

 
Heycoop ­ Photography
Senior Member
Avatar
507 posts
Likes: 1
Joined May 2012
Location: New Zealand
     
Oct 19, 2012 21:35 |  #1

This is a weird question I have always wondered about (I hope you understand it!) but is the increase in focal length from say 50mm-150mm equal to when you increase from say 450-550. Its just the numbers on the lens barrel get closer together as you zoom more.

Maybe I'm just going crazy :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:


Body: Canon 450D Gripped
Lenses: Canon 70-200 F4 L, Sigma 10-20mm f/4-5.6, 1.4x Tele Converter
Check out my Facebook Page (external link) (dedicated to my racing, not photographing), and give it a like!!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,919 posts
Gallery: 561 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 14915
Joined Dec 2006
     
Oct 19, 2012 21:41 |  #2

I'm not sure if this answers your question but in zooms there are groups of elements that move as you zoom in or out. So depending on the particular zoom it may be that a particular group of elements would need to move more as you get wider than when you are at longer focal lengths. I think its even more likely when you are in the part of the zoom range where the lens is going from wide to normal than tele to longer tele.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
vsg28
Senior Member
493 posts
Joined Aug 2012
Location: Houston, TX
     
Oct 19, 2012 21:41 |  #3

No, it is not the same. The angle of view is more at wider angles, and that is why the numbers are closer as you zoom more.

Going from 14mm to 16mm is much more than going from 90mm to 100mm for example.


Canon 7D w/grip, Canon SX30 IS (modified for IR), Rokinon 14mm, Canon 24-105 L IS, Sigma 50mm, Canon 70-200 F/2.8 L IS II, Canon 100mm L IS, Kenko 1.4x Pro DG, Canon 2x II extender, Yongnuo YN-565EX, Induro CT414 with Induro BHL-3 and GHB-A

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jra
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,568 posts
Likes: 35
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Ohio
     
Oct 19, 2012 22:17 |  #4

Think of it more as a percentage. Going from 50 to 150 will yield an image size 3 times larger. Going from 400-550 wouldn't even come close to doubling the image size




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Heycoop ­ Photography
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
507 posts
Likes: 1
Joined May 2012
Location: New Zealand
     
Oct 19, 2012 22:23 |  #5

jra wrote in post #15145315 (external link)
Think of it more as a percentage. Going from 50 to 150 will yield an image size 3 times larger. Going from 400-550 wouldn't even come close to doubling the image size

Great answer - thanks for that! Now I understand.


Body: Canon 450D Gripped
Lenses: Canon 70-200 F4 L, Sigma 10-20mm f/4-5.6, 1.4x Tele Converter
Check out my Facebook Page (external link) (dedicated to my racing, not photographing), and give it a like!!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jimewall
Goldmember
1,871 posts
Likes: 11
Joined May 2008
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
     
Oct 20, 2012 05:14 as a reply to  @ Heycoop Photography's post |  #6

The number distance difference is the same and so the focal length distance difference is the same. The field of view ratio difference is what is not the same. That is why a 1mm focal length difference at the wide end (say 10-20mm) but a 1mm difference at 200mm means almost nothing. (That last sentence applies for normal camera length viewing distances.)


Thanks for Reading & Good Luck - Jim
GEAR

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MikeWa
Senior Member
Avatar
879 posts
Gallery: 89 photos
Likes: 235
Joined Apr 2012
Location: Seattle Washington
     
Oct 21, 2012 13:07 |  #7

A $100.00 is a $100.00. If you add it to $50.00 it is quite an increase. But if you add it to $800.00 it is not so much. Even though it is still a $100.00. Oh yea we were talking about millimeters.

Mike


Mike...G9; 7D; 7D Mark II; EF-S 10-22mm; EF-S 18-135mm IS STM; EF 28-300mm F3.5-5.6L; EF 70-300mm IS USM; EF 70-200mm F2.8L IS-II; EF 100-400mm f4.5-5.6L IS; EXT 1.4-II & 2.0-III; The more I learn the less I know.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,482 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4578
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Oct 21, 2012 13:09 |  #8

Heycoop Photography wrote in post #15145194 (external link)
This is a weird question I have always wondered about (I hope you understand it!) but is the increase in focal length from say 50mm-150mm equal to when you increase from say 450-550. Its just the numbers on the lens barrel get closer together as you zoom more.

Maybe I'm just going crazy :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:

An increase from 50 to 150mm is 300% of the starting point.
And increase from 450 to 500mm is only 111% of the starting point.

A 111% increase from 50mm is going to 55.5mm!

The effect of FL changes in millimeters are relative to a starting point.


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,253 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
Strange Question I know, but...
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2561 guests, 171 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.