Is it possible?
why wouldnt canon make something like that if they do make 1.4x and 2x...
its a stupid question on my mind
Oct 25, 2012 17:31 | #1 Is it possible? 5D3 x2 | 16-35 2.8L II | 24-70 2.8L | 70-200 2.8L II | 85 1.2L II | S 50 1.4 ART | S 1.4x | YN600EXRT x3 | Bowens 400RX | Lowepro LOVE
LOG IN TO REPLY |
watt100 Cream of the Crop 14,021 posts Likes: 34 Joined Jun 2008 More info | Oct 25, 2012 18:17 | #2 pawelgawel wrote in post #15169353  Is it possible? why wouldnt canon make something like that if they do make 1.4x and 2x... its a stupid question on my mind I think you're right, "stupid question" .... errr.... not feasible
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 25, 2012 18:32 | #3 im bored at work... really bored 5D3 x2 | 16-35 2.8L II | 24-70 2.8L | 70-200 2.8L II | 85 1.2L II | S 50 1.4 ART | S 1.4x | YN600EXRT x3 | Bowens 400RX | Lowepro LOVE
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jericobot Cream of the Crop  5,128 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jun 2010 Location: preppingforthetrumpets More info | Oct 25, 2012 20:32 | #5 monopod or tripod α7ii + (batis 25 f2 / zeiss 55 f1,8 / macro 90 f2,8)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
20droger Cream of the Crop 14,685 posts Likes: 27 Joined Dec 2006 More info | This gets into the old lens-based IS vs. sensor-based IS argument.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CameraMan Cream of the Crop  More info | Oct 25, 2012 21:17 | #8 Jericobot wrote in post #15169958 monopod or tripod Less caffeine would be cheaper. Photographer
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DavidR Goldmember More info | Kind of pricey but will do what your asking for. Sony a9II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Kolor-Pikker Goldmember 2,790 posts Likes: 59 Joined Aug 2009 Location: Moscow More info | Oct 26, 2012 06:30 | #10 pawelgawel wrote in post #15169353 Is it possible? why wouldnt canon make something like that if they do make 1.4x and 2x... its a stupid question on my mind Yes, it's completely possible and there exist a couple of different stabilizers that go between the lens and camera, but they are for much smaller sensors, add 1.25x magnification, weight 2lbs and cost about $20,000.
5DmkII | 24-70 f/2.8L II | Pentax 645Z | 55/2.8 SDM | 120/4 Macro | 150/2.8 IF
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 26, 2012 09:58 | #11 I've looked into this, all it takes is some duct tape and super glue.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
NatureNut Goldmember  1,366 posts Likes: 2 Joined May 2012 Location: NY More info | Oct 26, 2012 10:36 | #12 rick_reno wrote in post #15171701 I've looked into this, all it takes is some duct tape and super glue. i think he wants to stabilize the camera, not the subject: Adam - Upstate NY:
LOG IN TO REPLY |
IslandCrow Senior Member  589 posts Likes: 1 Joined Oct 2008 Location: Rapid City, SD More info | Oct 26, 2012 11:04 | #13 rick_reno wrote in post #15171701 I've looked into this, all it takes is some duct tape and super glue. And a swiss army knife. . .
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CameraMan Cream of the Crop More info | Oct 26, 2012 11:30 | #14 Try a super fast shutter speed. Who needs IS at 1/8000 of a second.... Photographer
LOG IN TO REPLY |
20droger Cream of the Crop 14,685 posts Likes: 27 Joined Dec 2006 More info | Oct 27, 2012 10:03 | #15 Kolor-Pikker wrote in post #15171121 Yes, it's completely possible and there exist a couple of different stabilizers that go between the lens and camera, but they are for much smaller sensors, add 1.25x magnification, weight 2lbs and cost about $20,000.
As I said, not practical at this time.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is zachary24 1389 guests, 119 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
