Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 30 Dec 2005 (Friday) 11:15
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Your Right To Take Pictures (in the USA)

 
am_pitbull_terrier
Goldmember
Avatar
1,383 posts
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, P.A.
     
Dec 30, 2005 16:52 as a reply to  @ post 1037214 |  #16

Great articles/links..... They do open your eyes to some interesting points

webejamn wrote:
i dont blame them for not wnating people on their properity but its a camel and zebra in snow, how cool is that

:lol:


Powershot G3
LA-DC58B Lens Adaptor
Spot Filter 58mm
Diffusion Filter 58mm
SkyLight Filter 58 mm
SuperWide Lens
_______________

Rebel XT (black), 18-55mm, 24-70mm 2.8, 70-300mm /Lens Hood, 50mm 1.8
Opteka Grip
Radio Slave Trigger
Stroboframe Flash Bracket
580EX Flash & Canon Off Shoe Cord 2
Lumiquest On-Camera Softbox
And of course a POTN camera strap :)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PacAce
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
26,900 posts
Likes: 40
Joined Feb 2003
Location: Keystone State, USA
     
Dec 30, 2005 20:50 as a reply to  @ post 1037054 |  #17

Scottes wrote:
I don't believe that private property needs a No Trespassing sign. And a Mall is a public access area, yet is still private property and they can stop you from taking pictures.

Note that I haven't read the articles, and I'm not basing this on photographer's rights, just stuff I've heard.

LOL :lol: Scott, the author must have had you in mind when he wrote the article. Read the article. I think you'll be amused. ;)


...Leo

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scottes
Trigger Man - POTN Retired
Avatar
12,842 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Nov 2003
Location: A Little North Of Boston, MA, USA
     
Dec 30, 2005 21:19 as a reply to  @ PacAce's post |  #18

PacAce wrote:
LOL :lol: Scott, the author must have had you in mind when he wrote the article. Read the article. I think you'll be amused. ;)

I was amused, but then took it seriously at this sentence from the article:

As one lawyer told me, "I don't see why the act of trespass would turn something that occurs during the trespass into a tort if it wasn't one already."

Yup, makes sense.

I'm off to the mall... :wink:


You can take my 100-400 L away when you pry it from my cold, dead fingers.
Scottes' Rum Pages - Rum Reviews And Info (external link)
Follower of Fidget - Joined the cult of HAMSTTR©

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tom ­ W
Canon Fanosapien
Avatar
12,749 posts
Likes: 30
Joined Feb 2003
Location: Chattanooga, Tennessee
     
Dec 31, 2005 09:34 as a reply to  @ post 1037185 |  #19

jmoore-16 wrote:
Wow - Great stuff.

As I read the article, shots on private property that is freely open to the public is fair game unless the subjects have an implied privacy that you violate. The pictures in a mall are a good example. Everything is fair game unless someone is looking at the teddy that he bought for his mistress and you photograph it. <grin>

That's what I gather, though I've seen many malls that state "no photography". I'm sure that there are precident cases for this issue. May even be some jurisdictional regulations.

I had an interesting situation. I primarily shoot cars. I go to many races and shoot professional series and I was hassled by Roush Racing not to publish or sell any images of their cars as they informed me that the paint schemes are copyrighted and I could only shoot them for my personal enjoyment.

I was in a public place and they can't possibly expect privacy. Just the opposite, race cars are rolling billboards for their sponsors.

Comments?

John Moore

The right or implied right to privacy is a separate issue from copyright law. Copyright law prevents you from using the proprietary logos, images, and such of others for financial, tangible or intangible personal gain (an example of intangible gain would be using someone's copyrighted logo to falsly imply some type of association between yourself and that logo that might boost your own reputation).

You certainly can photograph race cars, and you can post images of them on free web sites, or share prints with whomever you please. But if you intend to sell them or use them in a publication, you must gain permission from the proper authority. Use of the images for news allows some exception, and there are also some exceptions where the logo appears in a secondary, unrelated position in an image (though publishers wouldn't print an image of, say, Martin Sheen with a Ford logo in the background without gaining permission from Ford). But for the most part, freedom to photograph doesn't allow freedom of copyright infringement.


Tom
5D IV, M5, RP, & various lenses

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jmoore-16
Junior Member
Avatar
20 posts
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Riverview, MI
     
Dec 31, 2005 11:18 as a reply to  @ Tom W's post |  #20

Well stated. Thanks Tom.

John Moore




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hellashot
Goldmember
4,617 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Sep 2004
Location: USA
     
Jan 01, 2006 09:45 |  #21
bannedPermanent ban

CoolToolGuy wrote:
This article is in USATODAY today:

It talks about the rights that individuals have, even on private property. It has four links to other content that discusses this, including some legal lingo.
Have Fun,

Right of trespass? I seriously doubt it. I'm a surveyor and my job has a necessity because of finding adjoining property corners that we trespass, but we cannot get a right-of-entry law with prior landowner notification passed in my state. Farmer lobbyists get in the way of it's passing.

Trespass laws, as most laws, are governed by individual states. If what that article said was true, then all our survey crews are photographers! lol

As for that Photographer's Right document - that is one attorney's interpretation. As for the Bill of RIghts - just like you have the right to free speech, you also have the right to be arrested after you make that speech - like saying you want the President of the US killed today or trying to encite a riot.

Anyone can draft a document and keep it with him, it doesn't mean that anyone has to believe or agree what you have is valid. Most places would call the police if you wouldn't leave as I would if I had property that people wanted to photograph and they wanted to enter when I didn't want them to.


5D, Drebel, EOS-3, K1000
lenses from 12mm-500mm

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Steve ­ Parr
should have taken his own advice
Avatar
6,593 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Feb 2005
Location: San Diego, CA
     
Jan 01, 2006 22:09 as a reply to  @ Hellashot's post |  #22
bannedPermanent ban

Hellashot wrote:
As for the Bill of RIghts - just like you have the right to free speech, you also have the right to be arrested after you make that speech - like saying you want the President of the US killed today or trying to encite a riot.

It's illegal to yell "FIRE" in a crowded movie theatre, yet it's perfectly okay to yell "MOVIE" in a crowded fire house.

Odd...

Steve


Steve

Canon Bodies, Canon Lenses, Sigma Lenses, Various "Stuff"...

OnStage Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Big_B
Cream of the Crop
Honorary Moderator
Avatar
4,586 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2004
Location: London, UK
     
Jan 02, 2006 04:42 |  #23

Are crowded fire houses all that common? ;)


www.pbase.com/sam_blac​kie (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tom ­ W
Canon Fanosapien
Avatar
12,749 posts
Likes: 30
Joined Feb 2003
Location: Chattanooga, Tennessee
     
Jan 02, 2006 05:45 as a reply to  @ Steve Parr's post |  #24

Steve Parr wrote:
It's illegal to yell "FIRE" in a crowded movie theatre, yet it's perfectly okay to yell "MOVIE" in a crowded fire house.

Odd...

Steve

Unless, of course, the movie theatre is actually on fire! But I'd probably get to the exit first before yelling fire, being the self-preserving type that I am. :)


Tom
5D IV, M5, RP, & various lenses

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
grego
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,819 posts
Likes: 2
Joined May 2005
Location: UCLA
     
Jan 02, 2006 06:49 as a reply to  @ post 1037124 |  #25

webejamn wrote:
i didnt read the articals either,
i think that if your taking pictures of some one else or someones kids or some thing like that and they stop you, thats fine, however just taking pictures of stuff should be ok... they should be able to ask you what your doing but not stop you... when i went to mexico city last easter, i was taking pictures in the mall and the security gaurd made me delete my pictures he said if i didnt he would take my stuff away and i would NEVER get it back... all i was doing was taking pictures of a cool car that was cheep there.

If you just do the delete all feature and have the proper software, you can always recover the images back as long as you didn't take another photo on that same card. I know Lexar, with their pro cards give you that ability which is very nice to have.


Go UCLA (external link)!! |Gear|http://gregburmann.com (external link)SportsShooter (external link)|Flickr (external link)|

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mdude85
Senior Member
391 posts
Joined Jul 2004
     
Jan 02, 2006 14:17 as a reply to  @ post 1036665 |  #26

PacAce wrote:
Hmmm, interesting. There was a time when I was at my wife's office, in the parking lot, taking pictures of a sandpiper by a pond beside the parking lot, when a security guard came up to me and told me that I wasn't allowed to take pictures there. I was told that I needed to get permission first before taking pictures. Although my wife works for a privately owned company and the buildings themselves are limited access (you need a card key to get in or the receptionist has to ring you in), the parking lot is open access to the public (no gates, walls or fences). So, if I read the article correctly, that security guard had no right to hassle me about my taking pictures there, right?

Most people in positions of "power" or who think they are in positions of "power" will use their implied "power" to try to make themselves feel better at your expense. Once you show a knowledge of the situation beyond the person with "power," that person usually backs down because they know they have entered a situation on false pretenses. Usually no one has any right to hassle you about anything. And yet, they get away with it because the people getting hassled tend not to know any better, and that sort of ignorance is what people who are actually in positions with little or no power, feed from.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jon
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
69,628 posts
Likes: 227
Joined Jun 2004
Location: Bethesda, MD USA
     
Jan 02, 2006 16:03 as a reply to  @ Big_B's post |  #27

Big_B wrote:
Are crowded fire houses all that common? ;)

Dunno about in Merrie Olde, but over here many fire companies are volunteer organizations and they hold Bingo games as fund raising efforts. Crowded? You bet!


Jon
----------
Cocker Spaniels
Maryland and Virginia activities
Image Posting Rules and Image Posting FAQ
Report SPAM, Don't Answer It! (link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.
PAYPAL GIFT NO LONGER ALLOWED HERE

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Steve ­ Parr
should have taken his own advice
Avatar
6,593 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Feb 2005
Location: San Diego, CA
     
Jan 02, 2006 17:04 as a reply to  @ mdude85's post |  #28
bannedPermanent ban

mdude85 wrote:
Most people in positions of "power" or who think they are in positions of "power" will use their implied "power" to try to make themselves feel better at your expense. Once you show a knowledge of the situation beyond the person with "power," that person usually backs down because they know they have entered a situation on false pretenses. Usually no one has any right to hassle you about anything. And yet, they get away with it because the people getting hassled tend not to know any better, and that sort of ignorance is what people who are actually in positions with little or no power, feed from.

It's ill-advised to make the assumption that the person challenging you doesn't know what he's talking about, simply because you have an article, that you got off the internet, in your pocket...

Steve


Steve

Canon Bodies, Canon Lenses, Sigma Lenses, Various "Stuff"...

OnStage Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CoolToolGuy
THREAD ­ STARTER
Boosting Ruler Sales
Avatar
4,175 posts
Joined Aug 2003
Location: Maryland, USA
     
Jan 02, 2006 17:10 as a reply to  @ mdude85's post |  #29

mdude85 wrote:
Most people in positions of "power" or who think they are in positions of "power" will use their implied "power" to try to make themselves feel better at your expense. Once you show a knowledge of the situation beyond the person with "power," that person usually backs down because they know they have entered a situation on false pretenses. Usually no one has any right to hassle you about anything. And yet, they get away with it because the people getting hassled tend not to know any better, and that sort of ignorance is what people who are actually in positions with little or no power, feed from.

If I interpret you correctly, you are saying there is a bit of Barney Fife in many of them. I agree, and I agree with your point that responding to them with something in black & white (or color :D ) will probably back them off a bit.

For me, the biggest point is knowing the limits of their ability to take control of your equipment or your images. If they want to eject me from the property, that is one thing - but my equipment is my private property, and what I'm seeing is that I don't surrender all of my rights just because I might have trespassed on the private property that they are guarding.

Have Fun,


Rick

My Gear list

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CoolToolGuy
THREAD ­ STARTER
Boosting Ruler Sales
Avatar
4,175 posts
Joined Aug 2003
Location: Maryland, USA
     
Jan 02, 2006 17:20 as a reply to  @ Steve Parr's post |  #30

Steve Parr wrote:
It's ill-advised to make the assumption that the person challenging you doesn't know what he's talking about, simply because you have an article, that you got off the internet, in your pocket...

Steve

I wouldn't advise getting in their face, but I also wouldn't presume that everyone with a uniform and/or a badge has a degree in law enforcement either.

Here in Maryland, a man was taken to jail and arrested for presenting a legal tender 2-dollar bill at a local Best Buy - 'nuff said?

Have Fun,


Rick

My Gear list

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,895 views & 0 likes for this thread, 23 members have posted to it.
Your Right To Take Pictures (in the USA)
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is MWCarlsson
1225 guests, 128 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.