Great articles/links..... They do open your eyes to some interesting points
i dont blame them for not wnating people on their properity but its a camel and zebra in snow, how cool is that

am_pitbull_terrier Goldmember 1,383 posts Joined Feb 2005 Location: Pittsburgh, P.A. More info | Great articles/links..... They do open your eyes to some interesting points webejamn wrote: i dont blame them for not wnating people on their properity but its a camel and zebra in snow, how cool is that
Powershot G3
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PacAce Cream of the Crop 26,900 posts Likes: 40 Joined Feb 2003 Location: Keystone State, USA More info | Scottes wrote: I don't believe that private property needs a No Trespassing sign. And a Mall is a public access area, yet is still private property and they can stop you from taking pictures. Note that I haven't read the articles, and I'm not basing this on photographer's rights, just stuff I've heard. LOL ...Leo
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Scottes Trigger Man - POTN Retired 12,842 posts Likes: 10 Joined Nov 2003 Location: A Little North Of Boston, MA, USA More info | PacAce wrote: LOL Scott, the author must have had you in mind when he wrote the article. Read the article. I think you'll be amused. ![]() I was amused, but then took it seriously at this sentence from the article: As one lawyer told me, "I don't see why the act of trespass would turn something that occurs during the trespass into a tort if it wasn't one already." Yup, makes sense. You can take my 100-400 L away when you pry it from my cold, dead fingers.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TomW Canon Fanosapien 12,749 posts Likes: 30 Joined Feb 2003 Location: Chattanooga, Tennessee More info | jmoore-16 wrote: Wow - Great stuff. As I read the article, shots on private property that is freely open to the public is fair game unless the subjects have an implied privacy that you violate. The pictures in a mall are a good example. Everything is fair game unless someone is looking at the teddy that he bought for his mistress and you photograph it. <grin> That's what I gather, though I've seen many malls that state "no photography". I'm sure that there are precident cases for this issue. May even be some jurisdictional regulations. I had an interesting situation. I primarily shoot cars. I go to many races and shoot professional series and I was hassled by Roush Racing not to publish or sell any images of their cars as they informed me that the paint schemes are copyrighted and I could only shoot them for my personal enjoyment. I was in a public place and they can't possibly expect privacy. Just the opposite, race cars are rolling billboards for their sponsors. Comments? John Moore The right or implied right to privacy is a separate issue from copyright law. Copyright law prevents you from using the proprietary logos, images, and such of others for financial, tangible or intangible personal gain (an example of intangible gain would be using someone's copyrighted logo to falsly imply some type of association between yourself and that logo that might boost your own reputation). Tom
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jmoore-16 Junior Member 20 posts Joined Dec 2005 Location: Riverview, MI More info | Well stated. Thanks Tom.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Hellashot Goldmember 4,617 posts Likes: 2 Joined Sep 2004 Location: USA More info | Jan 01, 2006 09:45 | #21 Permanent banCoolToolGuy wrote: This article is in USATODAY today: It talks about the rights that individuals have, even on private property. It has four links to other content that discusses this, including some legal lingo. Have Fun, Right of trespass? I seriously doubt it. I'm a surveyor and my job has a necessity because of finding adjoining property corners that we trespass, but we cannot get a right-of-entry law with prior landowner notification passed in my state. Farmer lobbyists get in the way of it's passing. 5D, Drebel, EOS-3, K1000
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SteveParr should have taken his own advice 6,593 posts Likes: 2 Joined Feb 2005 Location: San Diego, CA More info | Permanent banHellashot wrote: As for the Bill of RIghts - just like you have the right to free speech, you also have the right to be arrested after you make that speech - like saying you want the President of the US killed today or trying to encite a riot. It's illegal to yell "FIRE" in a crowded movie theatre, yet it's perfectly okay to yell "MOVIE" in a crowded fire house. Steve
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Big_B Cream of the Crop Honorary Moderator 4,586 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jun 2004 Location: London, UK More info | Jan 02, 2006 04:42 | #23 |
TomW Canon Fanosapien 12,749 posts Likes: 30 Joined Feb 2003 Location: Chattanooga, Tennessee More info | Steve Parr wrote: It's illegal to yell "FIRE" in a crowded movie theatre, yet it's perfectly okay to yell "MOVIE" in a crowded fire house. Odd... Steve Unless, of course, the movie theatre is actually on fire! But I'd probably get to the exit first before yelling fire, being the self-preserving type that I am. Tom
LOG IN TO REPLY |
grego Cream of the Crop 8,819 posts Likes: 2 Joined May 2005 Location: UCLA More info | webejamn wrote: i didnt read the articals either, i think that if your taking pictures of some one else or someones kids or some thing like that and they stop you, thats fine, however just taking pictures of stuff should be ok... they should be able to ask you what your doing but not stop you... when i went to mexico city last easter, i was taking pictures in the mall and the security gaurd made me delete my pictures he said if i didnt he would take my stuff away and i would NEVER get it back... all i was doing was taking pictures of a cool car that was cheep there. If you just do the delete all feature and have the proper software, you can always recover the images back as long as you didn't take another photo on that same card. I know Lexar, with their pro cards give you that ability which is very nice to have. Go UCLA
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mdude85 Senior Member 391 posts Joined Jul 2004 More info | PacAce wrote: Hmmm, interesting. There was a time when I was at my wife's office, in the parking lot, taking pictures of a sandpiper by a pond beside the parking lot, when a security guard came up to me and told me that I wasn't allowed to take pictures there. I was told that I needed to get permission first before taking pictures. Although my wife works for a privately owned company and the buildings themselves are limited access (you need a card key to get in or the receptionist has to ring you in), the parking lot is open access to the public (no gates, walls or fences). So, if I read the article correctly, that security guard had no right to hassle me about my taking pictures there, right? Most people in positions of "power" or who think they are in positions of "power" will use their implied "power" to try to make themselves feel better at your expense. Once you show a knowledge of the situation beyond the person with "power," that person usually backs down because they know they have entered a situation on false pretenses. Usually no one has any right to hassle you about anything. And yet, they get away with it because the people getting hassled tend not to know any better, and that sort of ignorance is what people who are actually in positions with little or no power, feed from.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jon Cream of the Crop 69,628 posts Likes: 227 Joined Jun 2004 Location: Bethesda, MD USA More info | Big_B wrote: Are crowded fire houses all that common? ![]() Dunno about in Merrie Olde, but over here many fire companies are volunteer organizations and they hold Bingo games as fund raising efforts. Crowded? You bet! Jon
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SteveParr should have taken his own advice 6,593 posts Likes: 2 Joined Feb 2005 Location: San Diego, CA More info | Permanent banmdude85 wrote: Most people in positions of "power" or who think they are in positions of "power" will use their implied "power" to try to make themselves feel better at your expense. Once you show a knowledge of the situation beyond the person with "power," that person usually backs down because they know they have entered a situation on false pretenses. Usually no one has any right to hassle you about anything. And yet, they get away with it because the people getting hassled tend not to know any better, and that sort of ignorance is what people who are actually in positions with little or no power, feed from. It's ill-advised to make the assumption that the person challenging you doesn't know what he's talking about, simply because you have an article, that you got off the internet, in your pocket... Steve
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CoolToolGuy THREAD STARTER Boosting Ruler Sales 4,175 posts Joined Aug 2003 Location: Maryland, USA More info | mdude85 wrote: Most people in positions of "power" or who think they are in positions of "power" will use their implied "power" to try to make themselves feel better at your expense. Once you show a knowledge of the situation beyond the person with "power," that person usually backs down because they know they have entered a situation on false pretenses. Usually no one has any right to hassle you about anything. And yet, they get away with it because the people getting hassled tend not to know any better, and that sort of ignorance is what people who are actually in positions with little or no power, feed from. If I interpret you correctly, you are saying there is a bit of Barney Fife in many of them. I agree, and I agree with your point that responding to them with something in black & white (or color Rick
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CoolToolGuy THREAD STARTER Boosting Ruler Sales 4,175 posts Joined Aug 2003 Location: Maryland, USA More info | Steve Parr wrote: It's ill-advised to make the assumption that the person challenging you doesn't know what he's talking about, simply because you have an article, that you got off the internet, in your pocket... Steve I wouldn't advise getting in their face, but I also wouldn't presume that everyone with a uniform and/or a badge has a degree in law enforcement either. Rick
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is MWCarlsson 1225 guests, 128 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||