http://www.youtube.com …zXeqkpOE&feature=g-high-u
Including putting a 50mm f/1.2L and a 70-300L on it....and using it as a video rig...
THe AF speed seemed a bit... Bad unfortunately...
KenjiS "Holy crap its long!"  More info | Oct 27, 2012 12:58 | #1 http://www.youtube.com …zXeqkpOE&feature=g-high-u Gear, New and Old! RAW Club Member
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 27, 2012 13:10 | #2 Just watched it, Yeah i sure won't be getting one, Seems very slow. Canon 1DX | EF 17-40 f4L | EF 50 STM | EF 85 f1.8 | EF 70-200 f2.8L IS II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RTPVid Goldmember 3,365 posts Likes: 3 Joined Aug 2010 Location: MN More info | Oct 27, 2012 13:54 | #4 davidc502 wrote in post #15175752 Wasn't a very serious review IMHO. DigitalRev never is. Tom
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 27, 2012 14:18 | #5 davidc502 wrote in post #15175752 Wasn't a very serious review IMHO. True but that doesn't mean they don't point out the Obvious Flaws of the Camera though. Canon 1DX | EF 17-40 f4L | EF 50 STM | EF 85 f1.8 | EF 70-200 f2.8L IS II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 27, 2012 14:38 | #6 DJHaze596 wrote in post #15175726 Just watched it, Yeah i sure won't be getting one, Seems very slow. Seriously? Based on that ridiculous YouTube review? He complains about the AF and he's fast walking, holding the camera in one hand while taking shots of people walking quickly toward him. Then he takes shots of white poles against a bright white background. Then he mounts two of the heavier EF lenses. And the 85 1.2 is is not exactly known as an AF performer. Useless review. And he is capable of good reviews.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
OneJZsupra Goldmember  2,378 posts Joined Aug 2009 Location: Guam More info | Oct 27, 2012 14:40 | #7 I won't be getting it..... but i've been saying that from the start, I'd consider the fuji X10 or X100 or any of them. Gear List | Feed Back | My Site
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BLD_007 Goldmember  1,036 posts Joined Feb 2010 Location: Kansas City, Mo More info | Oct 27, 2012 15:06 | #8 DigitalRev is a joke in my opinion. I don't think his photos are that great anyway. Glass: 8-15 f/4.0L | 16-35 f/2.8LmkII | 24-70 f/2.8L | 70-200 f/2.8L mkII | 100 f/2.8L Macro | 300 f/2.8LmkII
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 27, 2012 15:31 | #9 Eastport wrote in post #15175967 Seriously? Based on that ridiculous YouTube review? He complains about the AF and he's fast walking, holding the camera in one hand while taking shots of people walking quickly toward him. Then he takes shots of white poles against a bright white background. Then he mounts two of the heavier EF lenses. And the 85 1.2 is is not exactly known as an AF performer. Useless review. And he is capable of good reviews. It's 2012 dude, Cameras have been around for ages. It's time for these things to get going. Digitalrev Reviews tend to not be serious but like i said above, that doesn't mean they can't point out the Obvious Flaws of the Camera. It's called a Point and Shoot for a Reason, You point and shoot lol. It Didn't seem to work very well for him. Maybe it was on purpose or maybe it just flat out sucks, Who knows. Canon 1DX | EF 17-40 f4L | EF 50 STM | EF 85 f1.8 | EF 70-200 f2.8L IS II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
KeyserSoze1 Senior Member 525 posts Likes: 1 Joined Oct 2010 More info | Agree^ Digitalrev is normally not the best source for reviews but the review does show the camera's flaws and limits quite well. Canon 5DM III, 35 1.4 II 50 1.2L
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Lloydd Senior Member 379 posts Likes: 152 Joined Nov 2010 Location: Wellington, New Zealand More info | Oct 27, 2012 16:09 | #11 I think I'd end up dropping it with a 50L or 85L hanging off the end, too used to the ergonomics of a DSLR now.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
maverick75 Cream of the Crop More info | Oct 27, 2012 16:26 | #12 Just finished watching it, really disappointed in the AF. BLD_007 wrote in post #15176034 DigitalRev is a joke in my opinion. I don't think his photos are that great anyway. You don't get the joke if you think it's a joke. Kai seems great enough for Leica since they always feature him - Alex Corona Sony A7, Canon 7DM2/EOS M, Mamiya 645/67
LOG IN TO REPLY |
HaroldC3 Goldmember More info | Oct 27, 2012 16:46 | #13 Seemed like a toned down review from his normal reviews. Color commentary was pretty limited but I'm sure it's because Kai was under a tight timeframe. Anyways, I think other reviews have already exposed the slow AF and Kai showed how impractical this camera is for shooting moving subjects.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 27, 2012 17:11 | #14 DJHaze596 wrote in post #15176112 It's 2012 dude, Cameras have been around for ages. It's time for these things to get going. Digitalrev Reviews tend to not be serious but like i said above, that doesn't mean they can't point out the Obvious Flaws of the Camera. It's called a Point and Shoot for a Reason, You point and shoot lol. It Didn't seem to work very well for him. Maybe it was on purpose or maybe it just flat out sucks, Who knows. Image Quality and Video Quality are good, but AF sucks. That's what i got out of the Video. Simple as that. Ok I guess you were serious.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DarthVader There is no such thing as Title Fairy ever  6,513 posts Likes: 42 Joined Apr 2008 Location: Death Star More info | Oct 27, 2012 17:11 | #15 He's not excited I think because it's not an exciting camera for him but maybe for somebody else. Nikon/Fuji.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 1486 guests, 132 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
