Hogloff wrote in post #15179749
I just don't want this forum to turn into "hey look at this picture I took of a wall while I was loaded" type of place. That does not belong here. Your post is treading on that type of post. If you want real feedback, we've given you some and you seem to fight it. Photography for many is a passion and is taken seriously.
If you want to mprove in your skills, take some photos with a vision in mind, post the photos with all pertinent info and you'll get honest feedback on the good, the bad and how to do things better or differently.
Post some photos proclaiming you were drunk, do no effort to post process the photos and you'll get zero constructive feedback. It's up to you which path you follow. That's my advice to you if you truly want to improve.
1. not every newbie post-processes their photos from the get-go... I sure as hell didn't, and it's not a requirement of being a good photographer to begin with. If anything, people do it too much. It's also not a requirement to get comments on photos, which are also about composition, and I think that's what the comments here have been about. (and also, you started somewhere too, and unless you were practically born with a camera in your hands, chances are you sucked when you started).
2. Of the two pics that were posted, one was good and one sucked. That's 50% keeper rate. Pretty good imo.
3. About monkeys and everything... (also linked with my first point): artists throughout the ages have invented and come up with new processes, and they sure as hell haven't done so by following the pent-up rules of people who were saying there's only one good way of doing things. Sometimes it's an accident, sometimes it's on purpose.
One good example, imo, is Pollock. The bloke painted with his bloody FEET (did he use both or just one? can't remember). Yet, he made his mark in the artistic world, and no one came at him and said "Jeez mate, it's disrespectful to paint stuff holding your brush with your toes while others are using their hands, as is the natural order of things. Oh, and by the way, don't bother asking me for comments unless your stuff is already portfolio-grade."
Now, I'm not comparing the OP (sorry about the gender mix-up, these things are so difficult to figure out in English!) to Pollock, but the paradigm here is, imo, quite similar.
Ultimately, photography records how we see the world and, if I draw on what other people on this forum have said, there are already limitations on how and where it should be alright to portray people and 'record human history'... well, being drunk is part of it, and if there is an artistic way to explore that, I'm all for it and I don't see why it couldn't be done if it's done responsibly.