Processed from 9 raw image edits of a single image, then tweaked in PS...
Old farm house II by Speedscene Photography and Design, on Flickr
STIC Goldmember 1,627 posts Gallery: 360 photos Best ofs: 1 Likes: 985 Joined Oct 2012 Location: Palmerston North, New Zealand More info Post edited over 8 years ago by STIC. | Oct 28, 2012 13:09 | #1  Permanent banProcessed from 9 raw image edits of a single image, then tweaked in PS... Old farm house II by Speedscene Photography and Design, on Flickr7D MarkII l 50 1.8 STM l15-85 IS USM l 100-400 IS L l 2x converter l 580EX II l Wireless remote l A computer l Some software l A vehicle to get me around...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 28, 2012 14:59 | #3 very nicely done, i like that it's not over cooked
LOG IN TO REPLY |
photocopy Goldmember  1,555 posts Likes: 2 Joined Nov 2011 Location: PNW More info | Oct 28, 2012 16:41 | #4 I like!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Laramie Still livin' the cowboylife  3,220 posts Joined Nov 2006 Location: Inland Empire, California More info | Oct 28, 2012 18:16 | #5 LV Moose wrote in post #15178844 Looks nicely done to me. Do you have the original to show us? I always like seeing the difference HDR can make. Agreed. NIce image and I'd like to see the original as well. I like to process single raws a lot of times when I have trouble with ghosting, etc. 5DIII | 40D | 17-40 f4L | Tamron 28-75 2.8 | 50 1.4 | 70-200 2.8L | Oly Zuiko 50 macro | Tamron 1.4x
LOG IN TO REPLY |
STIC THREAD STARTER Goldmember 1,627 posts Gallery: 360 photos Best ofs: 1 Likes: 985 Joined Oct 2012 Location: Palmerston North, New Zealand More info Post edited over 8 years ago by STIC. (2 edits in all) | Permanent ban Original:  Old farm house orig by Speedscene Photography and Design, on FlickrHDR: Old farm house II by Speedscene Photography and Design, on Flickr7D MarkII l 50 1.8 STM l15-85 IS USM l 100-400 IS L l 2x converter l 580EX II l Wireless remote l A computer l Some software l A vehicle to get me around...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
HikinMike Walkin' Like a Penguin Now!  More info | Oct 29, 2012 02:34 | #7 I like the original. Doesn't look like you really need to do a HDR. Images in the Backcountry
LOG IN TO REPLY |
killwilly Senior Member  More info | I like the HDR, but I would like it better with the cables removed from the top. Alan. flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
STIC THREAD STARTER Goldmember 1,627 posts Gallery: 360 photos Best ofs: 1 Likes: 985 Joined Oct 2012 Location: Palmerston North, New Zealand More info Post edited over 8 years ago by STIC. | Oct 29, 2012 04:28 | #9 Permanent bankillwilly wrote in post #15181240 I like the HDR, but I would like it better with the cables removed from the top.  Old farm house Cleaned up by Speedscene Photography and Design, on Flickr7D MarkII l 50 1.8 STM l15-85 IS USM l 100-400 IS L l 2x converter l 580EX II l Wireless remote l A computer l Some software l A vehicle to get me around...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
AdamLewis Goldmember  4,122 posts Likes: 53 Joined Oct 2005 Location: Seattle, WA More info | Oct 29, 2012 07:32 | #10 |
Canonguy39 Senior Member  560 posts Likes: 1 Joined Mar 2008 More info | Oct 29, 2012 07:43 | #11 The HDR is the better of the two shots - has more character. Rod
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LVMoose Moose gets blamed for everything.  More info | Oct 29, 2012 07:50 | #12 This second HDR image (the one with the cables removed) looks better than the first; highlights aren't as blown in the tops of the trees and in the clouds; actually the whole thing may be darker. I like it. STIC wrote in post #15181349
Old farm house Cleaned up by Speedscene Photography and Design, on FlickrMoose
LOG IN TO REPLY |
killwilly Senior Member More info | Much better, I thought the cables were a distraction. Alan. flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JonClemens Goldmember 1,113 posts Likes: 7 Joined Jan 2012 Location: Solvang, California More info | Oct 29, 2012 09:39 | #14 The purpose of HDR is to be able to cover a greater dynamic range than you can achieve with a single image. In your 'original' image the only thing that was 'lost' is the deep shadows under the trees. If you had done a 'real' HDR you would have pulled up those shadows to show the details in those areas. Your 'HDR' version didn't recover the shadow areas, and could be duplicated with the use of standard processing software such as Bridge/Photoshop. Canon 7D | 400L | 70-200L | 24-105L | Tokina 11-16
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DavidArbogast Cream of the Crop  More info | Oct 29, 2012 11:12 | #15 Looks good, I like the processing! Whether it is technically an HDR or not is a pointless nit. David | Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 1085 guests, 113 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
.
