These are just a few shots from my first real e-session (I'm more used to family type portraits). Looking for C&C please on whatever you can throw at me to make these better. Thx!
AZPix Senior Member 574 posts Likes: 100 Joined Jan 2010 More info | Nov 08, 2012 21:46 | #1 These are just a few shots from my first real e-session (I'm more used to family type portraits). Looking for C&C please on whatever you can throw at me to make these better. Thx!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
marzel Member 231 posts Likes: 1 Joined Mar 2012 Location: Northern California More info | Nov 08, 2012 22:04 | #2 I like all of them, but it seems like #1 might be 1/2 stop under exposed (maybe less?)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
auroraskye Goldmember 2,445 posts Likes: 1 Joined Nov 2007 Location: Plano, TX More info | Nov 08, 2012 22:09 | #3 I have to agree, 1 and 2 are dark, #3 is way too contrasty.. #4 is okay, I like the idea of it I'm just not a big fan of sepia-ish tones. I am super cool n' stuff.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 10, 2012 14:26 | #4 In #1, his face is in focus but her's isn't http://emjfotografi.com/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sweetamber Member 51 posts Joined Mar 2012 Location: Romania More info | Nov 10, 2012 17:47 | #5 The last photo is great. the composition, the light is .... great. Filmare Nunta HD
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Great insight from all...thank you!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
robots4joey Senior Member 287 posts Joined Oct 2011 Location: Wichita, KS More info | Nov 12, 2012 12:17 | #7 I agree with elrey, something is up with #1. It's as if she was cut out of another image and pasted into this one. She should have been sharp, considering the other areas in focus. Did you do a bunch of skin smoothing on her? Website for Weddings: Wichita Wedding Photographer
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 12, 2012 12:34 | #8 #1..Not a fan of the angle. Something odd going on with the color too. Her eyes area bit dark
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ChristopherStevenb Goldmember 3,547 posts Likes: 7 Joined Dec 2008 Location: Ottawa, Canada More info | Nov 12, 2012 19:14 | #9 1-flash is not as hot as it should be resulting in underexposed subjects. The ambient (background) looks good though. Also--their expressions aren't matching up well. His smile renders her expression almost as a sour one.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sovern Senior Member 345 posts Likes: 1 Joined Aug 2012 More info | Permanent banFirst Photo: In the first picture the sun is fighting for my full attention due to it being so bright compared to the man and the women should have smiled more as her facial expression is emotionless, I would of also of had her relax her left hand more as her thumb looks rigid and it takes away from that soft emotion look you're going for. Canon 450D
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Really superb comments...thank you. I really liked all of these photos, but I needed other's eyes to help point out items I've stared at for too long. Still working on making everything tight. For example, with shot #1, the eyes on both when editing are in-focus, but with several comments stating the young lady looked perhaps out of focus made me realize my fill light on her was lacking. Overall composition might be ok on another, but the bride-to-be's arm in the wrong spot taking attention away from other parts; and so on, and so on.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 14, 2012 08:42 | #12 Was she preggers? I would actually have liked to see them at more of an angle. the lighting was well-done though. i'm not too crazy about the sepia as it's a little too green, and the high contrast shot is a bit too much for me as well. Canon 5DmkIV | Canon 16-35 F2.8L II, Canon 100 F2.8L Macro, Canon 135 F2L, Canon 24-70 F2.8L II, Canon 70-200 F2.8L IS II, Sigma 50 F1.4 ART, Sigma 85 F1.4, | Canon 600 RT, Canon 580 EXII, Canon 430 EXII | Radiopopper JrX's
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RangersForever Senior Member 302 posts Joined Jun 2010 More info | Nov 16, 2012 01:24 | #13 Number one has lighting issues. Did you use flash? Either way, here's a tip I learned that really helps in these situations...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 17, 2012 00:34 | #14 RangersForever wrote in post #15251942 Number one has lighting issues. Did you use flash? Either way, here's a tip I learned that really helps in these situations... 1. Set flash on top of camera, ETTL. 2. Set camera to Aperture Priority Mode and dial in the aperture you want. 3. Take a shot. The aperture/flash will expose the subjects and the shutter speed will expose the ambient. Look at your background... if it needs more exposure or less exposure... step 4... 4. Use the camera exposure compensation (wheel on the back) and underexpose or overexpose the ambient light to get your desired look. This way you can be sure that your subject exposure will be pretty much spot on and you can control the background light easily with the back wheel. As it stands, your image is really underexposed, there is no pop in their eyes, she is out of focus... give it a try because if I can do it with half decent results so can anyone!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 930 guests, 118 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||