Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
Thread started 08 Nov 2012 (Thursday) 21:46
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

First E-Session - need C&C

 
AZ ­ Pix
Senior Member
574 posts
Likes: 100
Joined Jan 2010
     
Nov 08, 2012 21:46 |  #1

These are just a few shots from my first real e-session (I'm more used to family type portraits). Looking for C&C please on whatever you can throw at me to make these better. Thx!


IMAGE: http://i674.photobucket.com/albums/vv106/dakotap67/DSC_1042.jpg


IMAGE: http://i674.photobucket.com/albums/vv106/dakotap67/DSC_1048-1.jpg


IMAGE: http://i674.photobucket.com/albums/vv106/dakotap67/DSC_0932.jpg


IMAGE: http://i674.photobucket.com/albums/vv106/dakotap67/DSC_0941.jpg



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
marzel
Member
231 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2012
Location: Northern California
     
Nov 08, 2012 22:04 |  #2

I like all of them, but it seems like #1 might be 1/2 stop under exposed (maybe less?)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
auroraskye
Goldmember
Avatar
2,445 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Plano, TX
     
Nov 08, 2012 22:09 |  #3

I have to agree, 1 and 2 are dark, #3 is way too contrasty.. #4 is okay, I like the idea of it I'm just not a big fan of sepia-ish tones.


I am super cool n' stuff.
http://www.brandithomp​sonphotography.com (external link)
Like Me On Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
elrey2375
Thinks it's irresponsible
Avatar
4,992 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 279
Joined Nov 2011
     
Nov 10, 2012 14:26 |  #4

In #1, his face is in focus but her's isn't


http://emjfotografi.co​m/ (external link)
http://500px.com/EMJFo​tografi (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sweetamber
Member
51 posts
Joined Mar 2012
Location: Romania
     
Nov 10, 2012 17:47 |  #5

The last photo is great. the composition, the light is .... great.


Filmare Nunta HD (external link) /
Terapia Yumeiho (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AZ ­ Pix
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
574 posts
Likes: 100
Joined Jan 2010
     
Nov 10, 2012 21:38 as a reply to  @ Sweetamber's post |  #6

Great insight from all...thank you!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
robots4joey
Senior Member
Avatar
287 posts
Joined Oct 2011
Location: Wichita, KS
     
Nov 12, 2012 12:17 |  #7

I agree with elrey, something is up with #1. It's as if she was cut out of another image and pasted into this one. She should have been sharp, considering the other areas in focus. Did you do a bunch of skin smoothing on her?


Website for Weddings: Wichita Wedding Photographer (external link)
Our Silly Photo Booth: Photo Booth Wichita KS (external link)
5DmkIII | 60D | 70-200mm f2.8 IS-2 | 50mm 1.4 | 85mm 1.8 | 3x-580EX | Radiopoppers | @ weddings I rent the works!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
scorpio_e
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,402 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 264
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Pa
     
Nov 12, 2012 12:34 |  #8

#1..Not a fan of the angle. Something odd going on with the color too. Her eyes area bit dark
#2 The pose really looks awkward and their mid section seem to disappear in the trees.
#3 Too contrast fro my taste
#4 Love the ring shot


www.steelcityphotograp​hy.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Christopher ­ Steven ­ b
Goldmember
Avatar
3,547 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Ottawa, Canada
     
Nov 12, 2012 19:14 |  #9

1-flash is not as hot as it should be resulting in underexposed subjects. The ambient (background) looks good though. Also--their expressions aren't matching up well. His smile renders her expression almost as a sour one.
2-pose looks awkward--seeing her arm 'cut off' reads oddly to me.
3-this experiment in contrast doesn't leave them looking very good in my opinion.
4-good.



christopher steven b. - Ottawa Wedding Photographer

www.christopherstevenb​.com (external link)| Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sovern
Senior Member
345 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2012
     
Nov 12, 2012 22:05 as a reply to  @ Christopher Steven b's post |  #10
bannedPermanent ban

First Photo: In the first picture the sun is fighting for my full attention due to it being so bright compared to the man and the women should have smiled more as her facial expression is emotionless, I would of also of had her relax her left hand more as her thumb looks rigid and it takes away from that soft emotion look you're going for.
I like this photo though I get the vibe that hes there to protect her and his hand being rigid on the thick tree branch shows this....this is my personal interpretation of the photo. Her face is also too soft and the lighting almost looks too soft in my opinion.

Second Photo: They're underexposed. My eye keeps wandering off to the bright sunlight on the water and the bright sky to the left of the photo. I would have raised my shutter speed/aperture and kicked the flash up a notch or two to make them the brightest object in the frame and slightly underexposed the backdrop. Also, his legs and stature is too straight I would of had him gently lean on her
bending that right leg possibly even slightly kneeling and I would of had him put his right hand around her hip.

Third Photo: Lighting is way too harsh, too much contrast, looks like a picture from a horror movie with the man being the protagonist.

Forth Photo: I would have cropped it slightly tighter.


Canon 450D
Tamron 17-50 2.8 non vc
Yungnuo 560 II Speedlite

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AZ ­ Pix
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
574 posts
Likes: 100
Joined Jan 2010
     
Nov 13, 2012 21:40 as a reply to  @ Sovern's post |  #11

Really superb comments...thank you. I really liked all of these photos, but I needed other's eyes to help point out items I've stared at for too long. Still working on making everything tight. For example, with shot #1, the eyes on both when editing are in-focus, but with several comments stating the young lady looked perhaps out of focus made me realize my fill light on her was lacking. Overall composition might be ok on another, but the bride-to-be's arm in the wrong spot taking attention away from other parts; and so on, and so on.

Long story short, I posted these for a reason and I sure am getting that help I need. Thanks!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bluefire7
Member
Avatar
190 posts
Gallery: 47 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 13
Joined Sep 2008
Location: Queens, NY
     
Nov 14, 2012 08:42 |  #12

Was she preggers? I would actually have liked to see them at more of an angle. the lighting was well-done though. i'm not too crazy about the sepia as it's a little too green, and the high contrast shot is a bit too much for me as well.


Canon 5DmkIV | Canon 16-35 F2.8L II, Canon 100 F2.8L Macro, Canon 135 F2L, Canon 24-70 F2.8L II, Canon 70-200 F2.8L IS II, Sigma 50 F1.4 ART, Sigma 85 F1.4, | Canon 600 RT, Canon 580 EXII, Canon 430 EXII | Radiopopper JrX's
NY Wedding Photographer (external link):eek:
LIKE Us (external link):cool:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RangersForever
Senior Member
302 posts
Joined Jun 2010
     
Nov 16, 2012 01:24 |  #13

Number one has lighting issues. Did you use flash? Either way, here's a tip I learned that really helps in these situations...

1. Set flash on top of camera, ETTL.
2. Set camera to Aperture Priority Mode and dial in the aperture you want.
3. Take a shot. The aperture/flash will expose the subjects and the shutter speed will expose the ambient. Look at your background... if it needs more exposure or less exposure... step 4...
4. Use the camera exposure compensation (wheel on the back) and underexpose or overexpose the ambient light to get your desired look.

This way you can be sure that your subject exposure will be pretty much spot on and you can control the background light easily with the back wheel. As it stands, your image is really underexposed, there is no pop in their eyes, she is out of focus... give it a try because if I can do it with half decent results so can anyone!


Scotland Wedding Photographer (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AZ ­ Pix
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
574 posts
Likes: 100
Joined Jan 2010
     
Nov 17, 2012 00:34 |  #14

RangersForever wrote in post #15251942 (external link)
Number one has lighting issues. Did you use flash? Either way, here's a tip I learned that really helps in these situations...

1. Set flash on top of camera, ETTL.
2. Set camera to Aperture Priority Mode and dial in the aperture you want.
3. Take a shot. The aperture/flash will expose the subjects and the shutter speed will expose the ambient. Look at your background... if it needs more exposure or less exposure... step 4...
4. Use the camera exposure compensation (wheel on the back) and underexpose or overexpose the ambient light to get your desired look.

This way you can be sure that your subject exposure will be pretty much spot on and you can control the background light easily with the back wheel. As it stands, your image is really underexposed, there is no pop in their eyes, she is out of focus... give it a try because if I can do it with half decent results so can anyone!


I used a speedlight bounced into an umbrella and back to the subjects - camera right. I shoot most everything in manual, this time exposing for the sunset, then attempting to dial in the off-camera flash to get just enough fill. Perhaps the same set up camera left would have helped. Thanks.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,445 views & 0 likes for this thread, 11 members have posted to it.
First E-Session - need C&C
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
930 guests, 118 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.