Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Computers 
Thread started 10 Nov 2012 (Saturday) 11:23
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

RAID 1 Questions

 
mattyb240
Senior Member
Avatar
844 posts
Joined Apr 2009
     
Nov 10, 2012 11:23 |  #1

Hey folks,

Now I have no experiences of RAID solutions, however I figure a RAID 1 configuration would be good to integrate into my back up solution.

For the record I currently have an on site and offsite back up at present which would remain in place. However as an added layer I thought RAID 1 would work quite well, my query is:

If one drive were to be removed or fail and a second one put in, would the 1 remaining drive automatically copy to the second new drive? Could this be used in a rotation for offsite backups? Or would the replaced drive need formatting everytime?

Sorry if this is a silly question....I currently have a 27" iMac and looking at this:Icy Box (external link)


Deviant Art (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Numenorean
Cream of the Crop
5,013 posts
Likes: 28
Joined Feb 2011
     
Nov 10, 2012 11:28 |  #2

RAID is NOT a backup.


Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mattyb240
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
844 posts
Joined Apr 2009
     
Nov 10, 2012 11:39 |  #3

Numenorean wrote in post #15229925 (external link)
RAID is NOT a backup.

Absolutely I understand that, hence me adding it as a layer, not as a solution. Due to my lack of experience I'm trying to find its possibilities. Such as swapping out drives to ADD to offsite backups.


Deviant Art (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mike_d
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,689 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 1073
Joined Aug 2009
     
Nov 10, 2012 12:34 |  #4

Once a drive is removed from a RAID array, the array becomes "degraded". The RAID controller should somehow alert you and ask for a replacement. The array will continue to function with the remaining drive(s) but is in danger should another drive fail before the array is repaired.

When you install a replacement drive, the controller will rebuild the array with the new drive. This will wipe out everything on that drive and its usually a rather time consuming process. This process isn't automatic in my experience. When you connect the new drive, you have to tell the controller to rebuild the array with it. I haven't used that particular product though.

Even if you reconnect the original drive you pulled 5 minutes earlier, the controller will still rebuild the array onto that "new" drive. RAID controllers synchronize data between drives at the block level, not the file level. So it won't just update existing files. It wipes out everything to integrate it into the array.

Constantly degrading and rebuilding an array will result in lowered performance since you'll spend a great deal of time in rebuilding mode. That's not what mirroring was designed for. All RAID levels above 0 are designed to increase uptime and/or increase performance beyond what a single drive can deliver. If that's what you want, then mirroring your data is a good idea. If you want another backup, just add another USB drive to your backup routine.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bob_A
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,740 posts
Gallery: 48 photos
Likes: 202
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Alberta, Canada
     
Nov 10, 2012 12:50 |  #5

mike_d wrote in post #15230093 (external link)
If that's what you want, then mirroring your data is a good idea. If you want another backup, just add another USB drive to your backup routine.

Or maybe add a large internal drive and run an automatic backup at whatever frequency you like. I back-up to an internal drive every two days and to an external USB drive much less frequently. For my working data drive I use a pair of 2TB drives in RAID 1.


Bob
SmugMug (external link) | My Gear Ratings | My POTN Gallery

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mattyb240
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
844 posts
Joined Apr 2009
     
Nov 10, 2012 13:07 |  #6

mike_d wrote in post #15230093 (external link)
Once a drive is removed from a RAID array, the array becomes "degraded". The RAID controller should somehow alert you and ask for a replacement. The array will continue to function with the remaining drive(s) but is in danger should another drive fail before the array is repaired.

When you install a replacement drive, the controller will rebuild the array with the new drive. This will wipe out everything on that drive and its usually a rather time consuming process. This process isn't automatic in my experience. When you connect the new drive, you have to tell the controller to rebuild the array with it. I haven't used that particular product though.

Even if you reconnect the original drive you pulled 5 minutes earlier, the controller will still rebuild the array onto that "new" drive. RAID controllers synchronize data between drives at the block level, not the file level. So it won't just update existing files. It wipes out everything to integrate it into the array.

Constantly degrading and rebuilding an array will result in lowered performance since you'll spend a great deal of time in rebuilding mode. That's not what mirroring was designed for. All RAID levels above 0 are designed to increase uptime and/or increase performance beyond what a single drive can deliver. If that's what you want, then mirroring your data is a good idea. If you want another backup, just add another USB drive to your backup routine.

That's exactly what I needed to know, thanks for taking the time reply everyone, just have to way up the pros and cons. The raid drive would not be degraded often maybe every few months just to rotate.


Deviant Art (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ben_r_
-POTN's Three legged Support-
Avatar
15,894 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Sacramento, CA
     
Nov 10, 2012 13:41 |  #7

Yep, mike_d nailed. FWIW I have been running a RAID 1 on my PCs for over a decade. Never had one of those drives fail, but should it ever happen Ill be ready :)


[Gear List | Flickr (external link) | My Reviews] /|\ Tripod Leg Protection (external link) /|\
GIVE a man a fish and he'll eat for a day. TEACH a man to fish and he'll eat for a lifetime.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MCAsan
Goldmember
Avatar
3,918 posts
Likes: 88
Joined Jun 2010
Location: Atlanta
     
Nov 10, 2012 17:45 as a reply to  @ ben_r_'s post |  #8

For my rMBP I have a RAID 1 set that contains all my documents, photos, music, movies..etc. For backup of internal SSD and the RAID 1 set, I use a 3TB Time Capsule. Another set could be to also do an offsite backup.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ben_r_
-POTN's Three legged Support-
Avatar
15,894 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Sacramento, CA
     
Nov 12, 2012 10:54 |  #9

MCAsan wrote in post #15230838 (external link)
For my rMBP I have a RAID 1 set that contains all my documents, photos, music, movies..etc. For backup of internal SSD and the RAID 1 set, I use a 3TB Time Capsule. Another set could be to also do an offsite backup.

How are you connecting the RAID to the rMBP?


[Gear List | Flickr (external link) | My Reviews] /|\ Tripod Leg Protection (external link) /|\
GIVE a man a fish and he'll eat for a day. TEACH a man to fish and he'll eat for a lifetime.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MCAsan
Goldmember
Avatar
3,918 posts
Likes: 88
Joined Jun 2010
Location: Atlanta
     
Nov 12, 2012 14:32 as a reply to  @ ben_r_'s post |  #10

How are you connecting the RAID to the rMBP?

thunderbolt :D

My ethernet cable adapter goes into one port on the LaCie 2Big Thunderbolt enclosures. The cable from my rMBP goes into the other. I get fast ethernet transport and fast disk transport to/from the rMBP. When I travel, I take the ethernet-thunderbolt adapter just in case I am in a location with ethernet..and no wifi.

When new ACDs are released next year, I plan to get one So the rMBP would connect to the ACD. The ethernet cable would go to a dedicated ethernet port on ACD. The LaCie drives would plug into a thunderbolt port on ACD.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
morph2_7
Goldmember
1,112 posts
Joined Sep 2012
Location: Los Angeles
     
Nov 12, 2012 16:59 |  #11

mattyb240 wrote in post #15229956 (external link)
Absolutely I understand that, hence me adding it as a layer, not as a solution. Due to my lack of experience I'm trying to find its possibilities. Such as swapping out drives to ADD to offsite backups.

RAID hard drives are never intentionally swapped in/out unless it is broken. If you're thinking of swapping a RAID HD on regular basis, you're doing it wrong.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mike_d
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,689 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 1073
Joined Aug 2009
     
Nov 12, 2012 19:14 |  #12

morph2_7 wrote in post #15238110 (external link)
RAID hard drives are never intentionally swapped in/out unless it is broken. If you're thinking of swapping a RAID HD on regular basis, you're doing it wrong.

Expanding an array is the only other reason to swap out a drive. Either way, I always hold my breath until the rebuild is complete.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,473 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
RAID 1 Questions
FORUMS General Gear Talk Computers 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is zachary24
1459 guests, 144 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.