Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 12 Nov 2012 (Monday) 13:58
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

How can i correct this "effect" and avoid it in the future?

 
imranali
Member
60 posts
Joined Jan 2012
Location: Accrington, UK
     
Nov 12, 2012 13:58 |  #1

Hi folks,

I did a shoot for a friend and whilst i had a blast experimenting i noticed a undesired effect on a few of the pics

5184
x
3456
TOO LARGE!
EMBED PREVENTED, IMAGE TOO LARGE:
http://img593.imagesha​ck.us/img593/1566/img0​114ec.jpg
Click here to see our image rules.


on the right cheek of the model (the left cheek on the picture) the peach skin effect going dark

it seems not quite right. its hard to explain why i'm unhappy with that but it just seems as if the the colours werent picked up right - i'd assume it would have to do with the fact that side wasnt lit up

would it be a case of popping a reflector to light that side up slightly or is it more technical on the camera side of things

http://www.facebook.co​m/ialiphotography (external link)
Full website to come soon!!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sandpiper
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,171 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 53
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Merseyside, England
     
Nov 12, 2012 14:16 |  #2

Looks like you just need to pay more attention to your lighting ratios. Adding a little more light to fill that shadow a bit more would sort you out. A reflector would do nicely, or another light (set lower in power to your main light).




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dmward
Cream of the Crop
9,083 posts
Gallery: 29 photos
Likes: 1548
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Metro Chicago
     
Nov 12, 2012 14:33 |  #3

Generally, if one wants to get smooth lighting for a closeup like this, place the light above the camera and then use a reflector under the camera to reflect up filling the shadow under the nose.

Care has to be taken that the light does not end up looking spooky.

For this image, try using Lightroom shadow slider to lighten the right side of the model's face.

Or leave it like it is, I like it.


David | Sharing my Insights, Knowledge & Experience (external link) | dmwfotos website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
imranali
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
60 posts
Joined Jan 2012
Location: Accrington, UK
     
Nov 12, 2012 20:35 |  #4

this is what i did to it...

yay? nay?

5184
x
3456
TOO LARGE!
EMBED PREVENTED, IMAGE TOO LARGE:
http://img33.imageshac​k.us/img33/9025/img011​42g.jpg
Click here to see our image rules.

http://www.facebook.co​m/ialiphotography (external link)
Full website to come soon!!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dmward
Cream of the Crop
9,083 posts
Gallery: 29 photos
Likes: 1548
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Metro Chicago
     
Nov 13, 2012 10:40 |  #5

Not sure how you feel about someone doing adjustments to your image(s) and then posting them so I'll just tell you what I did.

Took your image into Lightroom 4.2 and worked with the basic develop panel. Using those sliders its possible to get the the look you are interested in without too much trouble.


David | Sharing my Insights, Knowledge & Experience (external link) | dmwfotos website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
imranali
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
60 posts
Joined Jan 2012
Location: Accrington, UK
     
Nov 14, 2012 10:52 |  #6

dmward wrote in post #15240601 (external link)
Not sure how you feel about someone doing adjustments to your image(s) and then posting them so I'll just tell you what I did.

Took your image into Lightroom 4.2 and worked with the basic develop panel. Using those sliders its possible to get the the look you are interested in without too much trouble.

no its fine i dont mind seeing the result if at all possible!


http://www.facebook.co​m/ialiphotography (external link)
Full website to come soon!!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 571
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Nov 14, 2012 15:13 |  #7

imranali wrote in post #15244781 (external link)
no its fine i dont mind seeing the result if at all possible!

Go to your user profile and turn on "IMAGE EDITING OK"!


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jeppoy
Goldmember
Avatar
1,305 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Sep 2009
     
Nov 14, 2012 15:16 |  #8

the right cheek is over exposed and you can need color correction, your white balance is way off and yellow is bleeding off on the skin. buy a lightmeter it really is a great tool for studio lighting


No I'm not a photographer, I just shoot with Canon DSLR with those lenses with red thingy...;)

www.digital-xpression.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
windpig
Chopped liver
Avatar
15,918 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 2264
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Just South of Ballard
     
Nov 14, 2012 15:48 |  #9

I'd feather the SB more across her face.


Would you like to buy a vowel?
Go ahead, spin the wheel.
flickr (external link)
I'm accross the canal just south of Ballard, the town Seattle usurped in 1907.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dmward
Cream of the Crop
9,083 posts
Gallery: 29 photos
Likes: 1548
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Metro Chicago
     
Nov 15, 2012 13:28 |  #10

Here is your file with the adjustments I made in Lightroom develop module.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2012/11/3/LQ_623795.jpg
Image hosted by forum (623795) © dmward [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

David | Sharing my Insights, Knowledge & Experience (external link) | dmwfotos website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Kolor-Pikker
Goldmember
2,790 posts
Likes: 59
Joined Aug 2009
Location: Moscow
     
Nov 22, 2012 06:04 |  #11

dmward wrote in post #15249486 (external link)
Here is your file with the adjustments I made in Lightroom develop module.

The problem now is color artifacts where the shadow used to be, it's not that easy to lift shadows unless you have the raw file, because the jpeg compression threw out the color and detail information in the shadow. If you upload the raw I might take a crack at it for kicks.

It's certainly something one could even out in post, but you may want to try a lightmeter out, it definitely helped me get into the groove of using flash.


5DmkII | 24-70 f/2.8L II | Pentax 645Z | 55/2.8 SDM | 120/4 Macro | 150/2.8 IF
I acquired an expensive camera so I can hang out in forums, annoy wedding photographers during formals and look down on P&S users... all the while telling people it's the photographer, not the camera.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dmward
Cream of the Crop
9,083 posts
Gallery: 29 photos
Likes: 1548
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Metro Chicago
     
Nov 22, 2012 09:35 |  #12

Kolor-Pikker wrote in post #15275438 (external link)
The problem now is color artifacts where the shadow used to be, it's not that easy to lift shadows unless you have the raw file, because the jpeg compression threw out the color and detail information in the shadow. If you upload the raw I might take a crack at it for kicks.

It's certainly something one could even out in post, but you may want to try a lightmeter out, it definitely helped me get into the groove of using flash.

There may have been some color tweaking that could have been done in the HSL panel, but yes, this really needs to be done on a raw file with all the data available from the camera.

Getting the lighting right when shooting certainly is the preferred approach.
For what the OP is looking for I'd probably start with a large source right above the camera.


David | Sharing my Insights, Knowledge & Experience (external link) | dmwfotos website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,711 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
How can i correct this "effect" and avoid it in the future?
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is icebergchick
1344 guests, 166 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.