Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
Thread started 13 Nov 2012 (Tuesday) 15:20
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Best B+W filters that clean easily...

 
Tony_Stark
Shellhead
Avatar
4,287 posts
Likes: 350
Joined May 2010
Location: Toronto, Canada
     
Nov 13, 2012 15:20 |  #1

Hey guys, I have a very low end B+W CPL but I found it really detracts from my IQ which is why I never use it. I would be interested in getting a much better B+W CPL but I heard that with more coatings on a lens the more difficult they are to clean of smudges/fingerprints etc. Which would be the best or recommended. Want almost no IQ loss (if possible) and easy to clean.

I have a 110ND 3.0 77mm ND from B+W and its a real pain to keep clean.

What are your suggestions on filters and how to clean them?

Thanks!


Nikon D810 | 24-70/2.8G | 58/1.4G
EOS M | 22 f/2 STM

Website (external link) | flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
v35skyline
Goldmember
3,572 posts
Likes: 16
Joined Apr 2007
Location: San Diego, CA
     
Nov 13, 2012 15:26 |  #2

I have no problems cleaning my B+W Kaesemann CPL. That said, I prefer using my Marumi DHG Super CPL now (tied for #1 CPL on lenstip.com, cheaper, and I see no practical differences when comparing the two in use).

http://www.lenstip.com …_Results_and_su​mmary.html (external link)


X100s | X-Pro1 | X-T1 | XF 14 | XF 18 | XF 35 | XF 56 | XF 60 | XF 10-24
Gear List & Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nightdiver13
Unabashed nerd!
Avatar
2,272 posts
Likes: 38
Joined May 2010
Location: Bigfoot Country
     
Nov 13, 2012 15:34 |  #3

Tony_Stark wrote in post #15241711 (external link)
Hey guys, I have a very low end B+W CPL but I found it really detracts from my IQ which is why I never use it. I would be interested in getting a much better B+W CPL but I heard that with more coatings on a lens the more difficult they are to clean of smudges/fingerprints etc. Which would be the best or recommended. Want almost no IQ loss (if possible) and easy to clean.

I have a 110ND 3.0 77mm ND from B+W and its a real pain to keep clean.

What are your suggestions on filters and how to clean them?

Thanks!

I thought it was the opposite. The better the coating, the easier to clean. At least that matches my experiences. I've found the Marumi DHG, B+W MRC, and Hoya HD filters very easy to clean. Much easier than non-coated filters I have.


Neil

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tony_Stark
THREAD ­ STARTER
Shellhead
Avatar
4,287 posts
Likes: 350
Joined May 2010
Location: Toronto, Canada
     
Nov 13, 2012 15:37 |  #4

v35skyline wrote in post #15241732 (external link)
I have no problems cleaning my B+W Kaesemann CPL. That said, I prefer using my Marumi DHG Super CPL now (tied for #1 CPL on lenstip.com, cheaper, and I see no practical differences when comparing the two in use).

http://www.lenstip.com …_Results_and_su​mmary.html (external link)

Nightdiver13 wrote in post #15241763 (external link)
I thought it was the opposite. The better the coating, the easier to clean. At least that matches my experiences. I've found the Marumi DHG, B+W MRC, and Hoya HD filters very easy to clean. Much easier than non-coated filters I have.

Well this is certainly very encouraging to hear. I have been eyeing B+W MRC filters for a while but avoided them due to what I read/heard. To be honest, don't even remember where I hear this :lol:


Nikon D810 | 24-70/2.8G | 58/1.4G
EOS M | 22 f/2 STM

Website (external link) | flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nightdiver13
Unabashed nerd!
Avatar
2,272 posts
Likes: 38
Joined May 2010
Location: Bigfoot Country
     
Nov 13, 2012 15:49 |  #5

I think it can also be affected by the cleaning solution you use (if any). I used some spritzy crap I got off the counter at my local brick and mortar shop, and it drove me nuts. Then I picked up some Formula MC from 2filter and that has been super easy to clean off.


Neil

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
v35skyline
Goldmember
3,572 posts
Likes: 16
Joined Apr 2007
Location: San Diego, CA
     
Nov 13, 2012 16:03 |  #6

I use the following methods to clean (in no particular order, just depends on what's available):

1) Lenspen
2) breath + microfiber
3) ROR (residual oil remover) + microfiber
4) Zeiss lens cleaner + microfiber


X100s | X-Pro1 | X-T1 | XF 14 | XF 18 | XF 35 | XF 56 | XF 60 | XF 10-24
Gear List & Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tony_Stark
THREAD ­ STARTER
Shellhead
Avatar
4,287 posts
Likes: 350
Joined May 2010
Location: Toronto, Canada
     
Nov 13, 2012 18:23 |  #7

Nightdiver13 wrote in post #15241826 (external link)
I think it can also be affected by the cleaning solution you use (if any). I used some spritzy crap I got off the counter at my local brick and mortar shop, and it drove me nuts. Then I picked up some Formula MC from 2filter and that has been super easy to clean off.

v35skyline wrote in post #15241897 (external link)
I use the following methods to clean (in no particular order, just depends on what's available):

1) Lenspen
2) breath + microfiber
3) ROR (residual oil remover) + microfiber
4) Zeiss lens cleaner + microfiber

I never used any cleaner actually. Just breath and micro finer cloth. Works really well on my lens front element, but not so well on my filters. My 3.0ND is particularly tough to clean.


Nikon D810 | 24-70/2.8G | 58/1.4G
EOS M | 22 f/2 STM

Website (external link) | flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
goldboughtrue
Goldmember
1,857 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Colorado
     
Nov 13, 2012 19:10 |  #8
bannedPermanent ban

I didn't know there was such a thing as a low-end B&W filter. I've always regarded them as excellent.


http://www.pbase.com/g​oldbough (external link)

5D II, Canon 100 macro, Canon 70-200 f/4L, Canon 24-105 L, Canon TS-E 45, Sigma Art 35mm f/1.4

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
EhSantino
Member
Avatar
98 posts
Joined Apr 2009
Location: Buenos Aires
     
Nov 13, 2012 19:15 |  #9

I think i can clean my B+W filters just by looking at them.

On a more serious note, I only use breath+microfiber as it seems to work well for me.


Canon 7D | EF-S 10-22 | DC 17-70 | EF 70-200 F4L IS | 430EX II | Spotmatic F | SMC 50 1.4
Mordango (external link) - Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Indecent ­ Exposure
Goldmember
Avatar
3,402 posts
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Austin, Texas
     
Nov 13, 2012 19:20 |  #10

B+Ws have a coating technology, Nano, designed expressly for ease of cleaning.


- James -
www.feedthewant.com (external link)
500px (external link)
Gear List and Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tony_Stark
THREAD ­ STARTER
Shellhead
Avatar
4,287 posts
Likes: 350
Joined May 2010
Location: Toronto, Canada
     
Nov 13, 2012 19:44 |  #11

goldboughtrue wrote in post #15242483 (external link)
I didn't know there was such a thing as a low-end B&W filter. I've always regarded them as excellent.

Well what ever the lowest model offered by B+W is, I have that one. Everytime I use it, but IQ suffers immensely.


Nikon D810 | 24-70/2.8G | 58/1.4G
EOS M | 22 f/2 STM

Website (external link) | flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Indecent ­ Exposure
Goldmember
Avatar
3,402 posts
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Austin, Texas
     
Nov 13, 2012 19:48 |  #12

Tony_Stark wrote in post #15242636 (external link)
Well what ever the lowest model offered by B+W is, I have that one. Everytime I use it, but IQ suffers immensely.

That's odd. I have a B+W C-Pol that's not even so much as single coated that I use as a beater polarizer when I think the camera has a decent chance of getting something flung back at it. It was the lowest on the B+W totem pole and it performs excellently. It flares like a mother, but otherwise it's top notch IQ and built like a tank.


- James -
www.feedthewant.com (external link)
500px (external link)
Gear List and Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
peter_n
Goldmember
Avatar
2,483 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 124
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Boston, USA
     
Nov 14, 2012 07:42 |  #13

AFAIK the highest quality filters B+W make are the MRC F-Pro filters.


~Peter

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nWmR12
Senior Member
669 posts
Likes: 99
Joined Oct 2008
     
Nov 14, 2012 19:52 |  #14

I found my B+W MRC F-Pro C-Pol harder to clean than my Hoya at least with the microfiber clother. Maybe I just need a new microfiber cleaning cloth other wise I just use a Lenspen and that works very well for my B+W.


5DIII, 5Dc, 24-105L, 100-400L, 14mm Rokinon 21 ZE, 35L, 50 1.4, 50CM 2.5, Rokkor 58mm 1.2. 85 1.8, 135L |S90| Film: Mamiya RZ67 ProII/ Mamiya 7II | Rolleiflex 2.8C
flickr (external link)|500px (external link)|facebook (external link) - Travel/landscape | facebook (external link) - Portrait| Instagram (external link)
Portfolio (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tony_Stark
THREAD ­ STARTER
Shellhead
Avatar
4,287 posts
Likes: 350
Joined May 2010
Location: Toronto, Canada
     
Nov 14, 2012 21:40 |  #15

Indecent Exposure wrote in post #15242662 (external link)
That's odd. I have a B+W C-Pol that's not even so much as single coated that I use as a beater polarizer when I think the camera has a decent chance of getting something flung back at it. It was the lowest on the B+W totem pole and it performs excellently. It flares like a mother, but otherwise it's top notch IQ and built like a tank.

I may do some "scientific" tests one of these days, but everytime I used my B+W CPOL on my 24-105 was not pleased with the images at all. You are right about the flaring, very flare prone. When the time comes to pick up some new lens(es) I will be picking up some proper coated B+W filters.


Nikon D810 | 24-70/2.8G | 58/1.4G
EOS M | 22 f/2 STM

Website (external link) | flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,266 views & 0 likes for this thread, 9 members have posted to it.
Best B+W filters that clean easily...
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1079 guests, 113 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.