Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
Thread started 01 Jan 2006 (Sunday) 17:15
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Need better black backdrop

 
adjohnson
Member
60 posts
Joined Apr 2004
Location: Colorado
     
Jan 01, 2006 17:15 |  #1

I've been struggling with getting a perfectly black background with black seamless paper. My subject is 7 feet from the backdrop. I've got my lights fairly close to my subject so I can set the aperature high (small). And I bought some brolly boxes (poor man's softbox) for my fill and main so I have more control over lighting spill. And it still seems like I'm having problems with some reflection on the backdrop. Perhaps it's a problem that would be solved by using a black fabric backdrop?

Any suggestions would be appreciated. Have any of you had problems with black seamless paper? Any recommendations on where to get a black fabric backdrop?

The attached image is F18 at 1/125.

Thanks,
Amy


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ronald ­ S. ­ Jr.
Prodigal "Brick" Layer
Avatar
16,481 posts
Gallery: 12 photos
Likes: 71
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Sayre, Pennsylvania
     
Jan 01, 2006 17:25 |  #2

Well, I've never used paper. I use muslin. I have a black and a white at the moment. I don't use my black anymore, so if you were so inclined, you could purchase mine from me. It's 10'10"x15'. I paid $149 for mine from ebay from a company called "jandkgroup''. It's a Botero. It's been used twice. I'd be willing to let it go for say $120 shipped. Just in case. Oh, and it's cotton. Nicely done.


Back to your photo, I can't honestly tell what the problem is. However, I can't recall ever using such a small aperture for a portrait. I use a larger one as to blur out the background a bit so that you're not noticing the grain of the fabric. Also, you have to be careful, even with black, so as not to let light in from the back, or it can have a very displeasing effect.


Mac users swear by their computers. PC users swear at theirs.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mgbeach
Goldmember
Avatar
1,502 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Charleston, SC, USA
     
Jan 01, 2006 17:27 |  #3

you could use level adjustments in PS to finish the job. I used inputs of 44/1.72/255 and then masked off the dark areas on the pants to keep them from going totally black.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Michael G. Beach
Canon EOS 30D
EF 24-105mm f/4 L IS; EF 70-200 f/4 L; EF 100 Macro f/2.8
430EX, Alien Bees B800, Vagabond battery
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/michaelbeach (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
subtle_spectre
Goldmember
Avatar
1,657 posts
Joined Aug 2005
     
Jan 01, 2006 17:31 |  #4

Two things come to mind...3 really. First is the aperture...I'd bet you are well focussed on the texture or grain of the backdrop and thus picking up some of the light "caught" in the texture.

2d, perhaps the background was too lit...I have had this happen.

3d, perhaps your exposure is too high for the amount of black in the image...your meter may be trying to turn it 18% gray.

Or...I may know nothing. Good luck!



Scott
Vista owner...and user  :p _______________

Gear
www.scottcphotography.​com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JohnCollins
Senior Member
Avatar
539 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Nov 2005
Location: Philadelphia area
     
Jan 01, 2006 17:48 |  #5

That's an awesome shot, by the way. No help with your question, I just couldn't resist the compliment. ;)

John




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pacific
Senior Member
Avatar
290 posts
Joined Oct 2005
Location: American Samoa
     
Jan 01, 2006 21:07 as a reply to  @ JohnCollins's post |  #6

First of all, nice photo. I'm no expert but I have a black backdrop and was having problems until someone told me to make sure the background is at least one stop darker than the light on your subject. when I tried this the background went completely black.


Canon EOS 20D
Canon EF 50 f/1.4 USM
Canon EFS 17-85 f/4-5.6 IS USM
Canon EF 100-400 f/4.5-5.6L IS USM
Canon EFS 10-22 f/3.5-4.5 USM
Sigma 70-200
Canon 100mm macro
Canon Remote Switch and 420EX and 580EX
Sekonic L-558, Interfit 600ws lights

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
adjohnson
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
60 posts
Joined Apr 2004
Location: Colorado
     
Jan 01, 2006 21:58 as a reply to  @ Ronald S. Jr.'s post |  #7

(Ronald S. Jr.) I don't use my black anymore, so if you were so inclined, you could purchase mine from me. It's 10'10"x15'.

Thanks for the offer. But I think I need a 10'x20' because I specialize in photographing small children being themselves which means they move around a lot.

Back to your photo, I can't honestly tell what the problem is. However, I can't recall ever using such a small aperture for a portrait. I use a larger one as to blur out the background a bit so that you're not noticing the grain of the fabric. Also, you have to be careful, even with black, so as not to let light in from the back, or it can have a very displeasing effect.

My backdrop is against the wall so I think I'm ok as far as light coming through. And yes, that is extremely small aperture. I was trying to blacken the background - I read about it somewhere on the internet. I usually shoot around F11 or F13 with my other backdrops. My subjects move around a lot so I need good depth of field. When I have a little baby I open up the aperture for a nicer look.

(mgbeach) you could use level adjustments in PS to finish the job. I used inputs of 44/1.72/255 and then masked off the dark areas on the pants to keep them from going totally black.

That looks good! I haven't messed much with the middle slider on the levels chart - guess I should. Thanks!

(pacific) First of all, nice photo. I'm no expert but I have a black backdrop and was having problems until someone told me to make sure the background is at least one stop darker than the light on your subject. when I tried this the background went completely black.

I should check. I'll meter it next time I set it up. I assumed it wasn't lit at all because I've got the Brolly boxes and I thought the light fall off would be sufficient not to light the drop at that exposure. I'll also try it at a F11 and see if it is any better.

Thanks everyone!
Amy




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mjordan
Goldmember
Avatar
1,339 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Apr 2002
Location: Hillsboro, OR
     
Jan 01, 2006 22:22 |  #8

A brolly, spreads out light like any umbrella will. To control where you light falls you need grids or barn doors or some other way to control the light leaving the front of the light modifier. So yes, you are still getting past your subject, which is falling on your background. At 7 feet back you aren't getting a lot, but even black paper is a bit more reflective than muslin and you could be getting a bit of bounce back from your lights. Rather than decrease your stop, you might open up 2 stops and reduce the power of your lights. That will drop the amount of light hitting the background a bit more.

If you want good, but cheap black muslin, you can get 9' 10" wide by $12.90 a yard here: http://www.chicagocanv​as.com/theaterfab.htm (external link)

I have some 20' long and it works very well. It's made from thread that is dyed black before it's sewed together, so it's black all the way through. It's also washable and dryable... just take it out and hang it on your background stand a little before it's completely dry and there won't be any wrinkles.

Also, pretty good picture to boot.

Mike


Hillsboro, OR
Canon 1DMKII and lots of "L"
http://www.sitnprettyp​hoto.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
adjohnson
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
60 posts
Joined Apr 2004
Location: Colorado
     
Jan 01, 2006 22:33 as a reply to  @ mjordan's post |  #9

mjordan wrote:
A brolly, spreads out light like any umbrella will. To control where you light falls you need grids or barn doors or some other way to control the light leaving the front of the light modifier.

Can I put the grid inside the Brolly Box? Do you recommend any size grid? I've never used a grid before.

If you want good, but cheap black muslin, you can get 9' 10" wide by $12.90 a yard here: http://www.chicagocanv​as.com/theaterfab.htm (external link)

Awesome! Thanks!
Amy




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PacAce
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
26,900 posts
Likes: 40
Joined Feb 2003
Location: Keystone State, USA
     
Jan 01, 2006 22:35 |  #10

adjohnson wrote:
I've been struggling with getting a perfectly black background with black seamless paper. My subject is 7 feet from the backdrop. I've got my lights fairly close to my subject so I can set the aperature high (small). And I bought some brolly boxes (poor man's softbox) for my fill and main so I have more control over lighting spill. And it still seems like I'm having problems with some reflection on the backdrop. Perhaps it's a problem that would be solved by using a black fabric backdrop?

Any suggestions would be appreciated. Have any of you had problems with black seamless paper? Any recommendations on where to get a black fabric backdrop?

The attached image is F18 at 1/125.

Thanks,
Amy

How close is close? If the lights are closer to the subject than 7 feet, the background should be at least 2 stops darker than the subject and that should blacken the background for you sufficiently. However, if the problem is reflective glare from the background paper, than that's a different story. You may need to shift the position of the lights around to get rid of the reflection. If not, as you said, you might need to switch to a cloth background.


...Leo

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
adjohnson
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
60 posts
Joined Apr 2004
Location: Colorado
     
Jan 01, 2006 22:40 as a reply to  @ PacAce's post |  #11

PacAce wrote:
How close is close? If the lights are closer to the subject than 7 feet, the background should be at least 2 stops darker than the subject and that should blacken the background for you sufficiently. However, if the problem is reflective glare from the background paper, than that's a different story. You may need to shift the position of the lights around to get rid of the reflection. If not, as you said, you might need to switch to a cloth background.

Yeah, that's what I had read - If I had my lights close to my subjects then my background would be black. My main and fill lights (for the black backdrop) are within 3 feet of my subject, and neither one of them is facing the backdrop (each are at 45 degrees).

Amy




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PacAce
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
26,900 posts
Likes: 40
Joined Feb 2003
Location: Keystone State, USA
     
Jan 01, 2006 22:45 as a reply to  @ adjohnson's post |  #12

adjohnson wrote:
Yeah, that's what I had read - If I had my lights close to my subjects then my background would be black. My main and fill lights (for the black backdrop) are within 3 feet of my subject, and neither one of them is facing the backdrop (each are at 45 degrees).

Amy

The reflection seem to be coming from an overhead light, not the ones on the side. Does that make sense? You aren't using any overhead lights, are you?


...Leo

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
adjohnson
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
60 posts
Joined Apr 2004
Location: Colorado
     
Jan 01, 2006 22:57 as a reply to  @ PacAce's post |  #13

PacAce wrote:
The reflection seem to be coming from an overhead light, not the ones on the side. Does that make sense? You aren't using any overhead lights, are you?

I have some dim ambient lights above my studio floor but I never thought they would affect anything. I do have reflection at it's worst right where the seamless paper bends to go up. I've attached another image that shows it clearly.

Thanks,
Amy


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ronald ­ S. ­ Jr.
Prodigal "Brick" Layer
Avatar
16,481 posts
Gallery: 12 photos
Likes: 71
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Sayre, Pennsylvania
     
Jan 01, 2006 23:00 as a reply to  @ adjohnson's post |  #14

adjohnson wrote:
Thanks for the offer. But I think I need a 10'x20' because I specialize in photographing small children being themselves which means they move around a lot.

Yep, I understand. That's why when I got my white one, I went with a 10x24' one. I have 4 nephews, and another on the way. :rolleyes:


Mac users swear by their computers. PC users swear at theirs.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhotosGuy
Cream of the Crop, R.I.P.
Avatar
75,941 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 2611
Joined Feb 2004
Location: Middle of Michigan
     
Jan 01, 2006 23:14 |  #15

Look at it this way. If the light is 5.6 feet from the subject, it will be 1 stop darker on a backdrop at 8', 2 stops at 11', 3 stops at 16'. See how it works? Same as f-stops.


FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
Classic Carz, Racing, Air Show, Flowers.
Find the light... A few Car Lighting Tips, and MOVE YOUR FEET!
Have you thought about making your own book? // Need an exposure crutch?
New Image Size Limits: Image must not exceed 1600 pixels on any side.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,038 views & 0 likes for this thread, 10 members have posted to it.
Need better black backdrop
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is vinceisvisual
1095 guests, 178 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.