I think you need the Leica M9 with the 35mm 1.4 summilux.
I think MKIII with the new Sigma will do just as good, if not better. I definitely have a better sensor
Nov 17, 2012 00:45 | #16 cdang wrote in post #15255733 I think you need the Leica M9 with the 35mm 1.4 summilux. I think MKIII with the new Sigma will do just as good, if not better. I definitely have a better sensor www.lightpilgrim.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
davidlacey Senior Member 968 posts Likes: 1 Joined Sep 2010 Location: Colorado More info | Nov 17, 2012 01:02 | #17 I like the 35L for just about everything. I find the 35mm focal length very useful and my 35L is very sharp and focuses fast what more could anyone want. I have a 50MP manual focus and it is hard for me to use when taking pictures of people but great for the other stuff.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Tony_Stark Shellhead 4,287 posts Likes: 350 Joined May 2010 Location: Toronto, Canada More info | Nov 17, 2012 01:20 | #18 |
davidlacey Senior Member 968 posts Likes: 1 Joined Sep 2010 Location: Colorado More info | Nov 17, 2012 01:23 | #19 Tony_Stark wrote in post #15255830 If you are struggling with focus through the VF, why not try Live View? It can be cumbersome but gives a much better idea of what is in focus ![]() Not so good on sunny days and still kind of cumbersome when working with people. I do like it for closeup work though it works wonders.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 17, 2012 01:30 | #20 Tony_Stark wrote in post #15255830 If you are struggling with focus through the VF, why not try Live View? It can be cumbersome but gives a much better idea of what is in focus ![]() Tony Stark, you should know this best of all, if you do something you want to enjoy it. Reason why I have DSLR is because of the process of taking photographs - bright optical viewfinder. I also want speed, because I photograph people when they move...I need to catch a moment. The only time that I use life view is when I have my camera on a tripod and photograph landscapes. www.lightpilgrim.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
edrader "I am not the final word" More info | Nov 17, 2012 01:35 | #21 light_pilgrim wrote in post #15254196 For people that use 35 mm very often, most of the time - what would be your call? Did you just get one lens and it is THE ONE or you tried different versions, different Brands (Samyang, Sigma, Zeiss) until you have found the one that works best for you. What was the deciding factor - the bokeh, weight, AF or MR, overall IQ, sharpness? What do you use it for? Also...can you post your best shot produced by this lens? And finally...........what do you think about the coming Sigma 35 f/1.4? i'm waiting for the 35mm f2 IS. if it's sharp wide open i'll probably get it. f2 + 4-stop IS. wow http://instagram.com/edraderphotography/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jam.radonc Goldmember 1,187 posts Likes: 2 Joined Feb 2010 Location: Dublin More info | Nov 17, 2012 04:36 | #22 For unique rendition of your images I do find Zeiss very special. If you don't mind MF that is. Not tried the Zeiss 1.4 version though so I can't comment on that. Jam
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 17, 2012 04:40 | #23 Jam.radonc wrote in post #15256073 For unique rendition of your images I do find Zeiss very special. If you don't mind MF that is. Not tried the Zeiss 1.4 version though so I can't comment on that. Who would have been talking other lenses, if Zeiss had AF. I like everything about 34 f/1.4 ZE and really, really like style signature of this lens, but you can't believe how many moments I have missed due to inability to nail the focus. Just don't want to talk it www.lightpilgrim.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sebr Goldmember 4,628 posts Likes: 9 Joined Jan 2007 Location: Sweden/France More info | Nov 17, 2012 05:42 | #24 I am quite happy with my 35L and I find the AF really useful in many situations. Sebastien
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 17, 2012 05:52 | #25 light_pilgrim wrote in post #15255653 I think Sigma will not target current 35L users...it is mostly for new users or somebody who wants 35 mm with AF and is waiting for 35L II as it can be released soon or cannot work with MF...or for those who want to have great lens for a lot less ($899). For you it will not change anything in life, I think-) I don't know Ian
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 17, 2012 05:55 | #26 h14nha wrote in post #15256161 I don't know I've seen plenty on here recently who say they are prepared to sell their 35mm L's for the new Sigma. Gear acquisition syndrome www.lightpilgrim.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bobbyz Cream of the Crop 20,506 posts Likes: 3479 Joined Nov 2007 Location: Bay Area, CA More info | Nov 17, 2012 09:12 | #27 more coz it is cheaper. That is the main reason IMHO. Fuji XT-1, 18-55mm
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Cesium Goldmember 1,967 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jun 2009 More info | Nov 17, 2012 23:23 | #28 There is no reason to sell 35ls for the sigma.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
aegid Senior Member 506 posts Joined Apr 2011 More info | Nov 18, 2012 01:13 | #29 No one can really say either way til the Sigma 35 gets out for people to play with. 5d3,17-40,24-105,24 1.4,85 1.4,70-200 2.8 is ii
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 18, 2012 01:42 | #30 |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 929 guests, 133 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||