My Everyday Nikon Lens, Which is Far MORE Expensive Than Any My Canon Lens! -- The Lounge in photography-on-the.net forums

Cream of the Crop

8,153 posts
Gallery: 137 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 511
Joined Sep 2010
Location: ɐılɐɹʇsnɐ 'ǝuɹnoqlǝɯ

More info

Nov 17, 2012 18:26 | #1

Just get my wife and myself new pair of spectacles, which is Nikon as usual :cool:

Only one 'Group', and Three 'Elements' - Multifocal, Transitions and Anti-reflective Coating.

Cost for my wife's over $900, and my one close to $900 for the lens self :oops:

So, all my Canon lenses are REALLY REALLY CHEAP compare to Nikon lens :lol: :lol: :lol:

IMAGE: http://farm5.staticflickr.com/4152/5208159889_263ef0872f_b.jpg

IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/photos/x_tan/5208159889/

Test

by X_Tan

, on Flickr

IMAGE: http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7024/6399397271_836951051c_b.jpg

IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/photos/x_tan/6399397271/

Canon Lenses

by X_Tan

, on Flickr

After all, I'm not getting into the 'war' between Canon Vs Nikon

Canon 5D3 + Zoom (EF 17-40L, 24-105L & 28-300L, 100-400L II) & Prime (24L II, 85L II, 100L, 135L & 200 f/2.8L II; Zeiss 1,4/35)
Sony α7r + Zeiss 1,8/55 FE
Nikon Coolpix A; Nikon F3 & F100 + Zeiss 1,4/50
Retiring

LIKES 0

x_tan
THREAD STARTER

Cream of the Crop

8,153 posts
Gallery: 137 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 511
Joined Sep 2010
Location: ɐılɐɹʇsnɐ 'ǝuɹnoqlǝɯ

More info

Nov 17, 2012 22:33 | #3

^Canon lenses are sexier in this case
2nd though, the Nikon lens is not that expensive as we are using them every single day; also they guaranty all Canon lens can take the right shoot

LIKES 0

RedSloth

Senior Member

412 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2012

More info

Nov 17, 2012 22:44 | #4

Can't claim your specitcals on tax either!

Cheers
RedSloth
A Magic Lantern fan running 5D Mark III, 60D, 85L II, 16-35L, 24-70L II, 24-105L, 70-200 2.8L II, 100-400L II, 10-22, 17-55 and a couple of speed lights. If only my ability could match my gear!

LIKES 0

x_tan
THREAD STARTER

Cream of the Crop

8,153 posts
Gallery: 137 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 511
Joined Sep 2010
Location: ɐılɐɹʇsnɐ 'ǝuɹnoqlǝɯ

More info

Nov 17, 2012 23:35 | #5

^In this case, we clam $200 max each from our health fund; then we 'can claim a tax offset of 20% (that is, 20 cents in the dollar) of (your) net medical expenses over $2,060. There is no upper limit on the amount (you) can claim.'

http://www.ato.gov.au/content/00313907.htm

LIKES 0

x_tan
THREAD STARTER

Cream of the Crop

8,153 posts
Gallery: 137 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 511
Joined Sep 2010
Location: ɐılɐɹʇsnɐ 'ǝuɹnoqlǝɯ

More info

Nov 18, 2012 03:30 | #7

UV? Still have around 10 of them need to get rip off

LIKES 0

Jump to forum... • Rules • Forums • New posts • RTAT • 'Best of' • Gallery • Gear • Reviews • Member list • Polls • Image rules • Search • Password reset • Home

Not a member yet?

Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

THEME: Paper White | Darker
MARGINS: (this page: defaults)

Latest registered member is semonsters
1673 guests, 138 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.

	x 1600
	y 1600