I've gotta say, even just getting my L lenses recently and being very happy with the pictures that come out with them, when shooting cars I just love shooting with my nifty fifty.
How about you guys?
Russo09 Senior Member 737 posts Likes: 3 Joined Dec 2011 Location: Long Island, NY More info | Nov 18, 2012 10:30 | #1 I've gotta say, even just getting my L lenses recently and being very happy with the pictures that come out with them, when shooting cars I just love shooting with my nifty fifty. -Nick
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Tony_Stark Shellhead 4,287 posts Likes: 350 Joined May 2010 Location: Toronto, Canada More info | Nov 18, 2012 11:09 | #2 My 24-105L is the perfect all round lens for automotive photography. I can do an entire shoot without ever switching lenses. Nikon D810 | 24-70/2.8G | 58/1.4G
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mosephus Senior Member 774 posts Joined Sep 2009 Location: Duncanville, TX More info | Nov 18, 2012 13:27 | #3 |
PhotosGuy Cream of the Crop, R.I.P. More info | Nov 18, 2012 13:31 | #4 28-70. 28 for angle shots, & 70 for profile, & square on shots to keep big tires from looking weird, which I wasn't able to do in the #8 shot here: A "GREAT car": '69 Plymouth Road Runner 440 FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Lesmore Senior Member 874 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jan 2011 More info | Nov 18, 2012 17:16 | #5 I have two favourites....both Pentax. One is the Pentax 12-24mm...very clear, colour rendition excellent.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 18, 2012 18:08 | #6 Russo09 wrote in post #15259919 I've gotta say, even just getting my L lenses recently and being very happy with the pictures that come out with them, when shooting cars I just love shooting with my nifty fifty. How about you guys? If you're referring to images of stationary cars, two lenses have worked wel. The Canon 18-200mm IS lens has been effective for the task, creating this picture.
And there's the Canon 18-55mm IS, which was used for this image.
However, you'll find that there is no single magic or specialized lens for this task. Range to the subject, framing, lighting and angles will be more important than any one lens. A photographer's vision and imagination will count more than equipment. For any single combination, there will be many lenses that can accomplish a specific goal.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
erikfig Goldmember 2,151 posts Likes: 203 Joined May 2012 Location: Orlando, FL More info | Nov 20, 2012 08:27 | #7 |
DV2000NJ Member 165 posts Joined Oct 2011 Location: Central NJ More info | Nov 22, 2012 22:30 | #8 I'm a huge fan of my 100 f/2. Good on crop, amazing on FF. Miata IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …/danvalanzola/6294249915/ October wonderland IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …/danvalanzola/6688352543/ Nick's 2004 STI -Dan
LOG IN TO REPLY |
rsutton1223 Member 114 posts Likes: 3 Joined May 2012 More info | Nov 23, 2012 14:55 | #9 HANDS DOWN the 135mm/f2 from Canon. Unless you are doing something that you need a real wide angle (like rig shots)...the 135mm is the staple of super sharp/beautiful bokeh primes. I almost always shoot automotive work with it. Patiently Waiting IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …s/rsutton1223/8208274083/ Morning Cruise IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …s/rsutton1223/7902403606/ NOMURCI Canon 5D Mark III - Canon 50mm/f1.4 USM - Canon 135mm/f2 L - Canon 17-40mm/f4 L - Canon 600EX-RT
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JGLPhotography Hatchling 6 posts Joined Nov 2012 Location: Bel Air Maryland More info | Nov 23, 2012 19:14 | #10 i like to use my 70-200mm just good with the crop on the 60d and easier to use then the other lenses i have. the pictures above are crazy good especially the one of the gtr with the sunlight behind it.... dang JGL Photography Josh Landes
LOG IN TO REPLY |
I used the 24-70 f2.8 II along with the 1D4 for an indoor car show. It did a great job, but I think it would be a tad better on the 5D2/5D3, allowing you to get closer to the car. When you see my camera gear you'll think I'm a pro.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Tony_Stark Shellhead 4,287 posts Likes: 350 Joined May 2010 Location: Toronto, Canada More info | Dec 11, 2012 14:17 | #12 |
Dec 12, 2012 23:41 | #13 Tony_Stark wrote in post #15354102 I'm thinking for the next car show I go to, maybe rent the 24-70 II or the 24L. Not sure yet. It would be interesting to see how the IQ produced by the 24L compares to the 24-70 II @ 24. When you see my camera gear you'll think I'm a pro.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
StevePhoto Member 79 posts Joined Mar 2010 Location: New York More info | Dec 23, 2012 14:38 | #14 I use a 24-70 and 70-200 most, but in the end it comes down to personal preference and the circumstances of the shoot. Different focal length lenses produce dramatically different results and sometimes, depending on the location and other factors, you need to be closer or further from the subject. Richard Prince
LOG IN TO REPLY |
lusospeed Member 181 posts Likes: 10 Joined Dec 2012 Location: pennsylvania More info | Dec 25, 2012 00:22 | #15 The environment you are shooting in will also dictate what lenses are best. 24-70 and 70-200 are the most common, however, a 16-35 will also yield a nice image, especially with an interesting background or sky. If you have longer lenses, they too will give you a different look in terms of the compression of space. Only issue with the 16-35 lens is the distortion you get. In the end, much of it comes down to personal taste and aesthetic sensibilities.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is ealarcon 1237 guests, 148 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||