Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
Thread started 22 Nov 2012 (Thursday) 12:20
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Kacey 22" BD deflector test

 
windpig
Chopped liver
Avatar
15,915 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 2259
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Just South of Ballard
     
Nov 22, 2012 12:20 |  #1

This is a continuation of a discussion on the Seniors image image thread.
How much effect does the proximity of the deflector to flash tube make?
I've got a Chimera to Elinchrom speedring adapter that Jerry installed on the BD. Half the width of the flash tube sticks out into the dish.
The dish comes with 4 stand off legs to hold the deflector. Each leg is 4 segments, 2 - 3/4 inch and 2 - 1 inch.
For this test I used 4, 3 and 2 sections for each leg. I use 4 sections as my default. 4 standoffs equals 3 1/2 inches, 3 equals 2 1/2 inches, 2 equals 1 3/4 inches.
The issue that came up was poor illumination due to lighting from direct flash between the dish and deflector when feathering across the subject.

The images are as follows
1 - straight at the blue target dot at 32" using all 4 sections.
2 - 45 degree aimed at target dot at 42" using all 4 sections.
3 - 45 degree aimed 12" to right of target dot using all 4 sections.
4 - 45 degree aimed 24" to right of target dot using all 4 sections.

1

IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE

2
IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE

3
IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE

4
IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE

Would you like to buy a vowel?
Go ahead, spin the wheel.
flickr (external link)
I'm accross the canal just south of Ballard, the town Seattle usurped in 1907.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
windpig
THREAD ­ STARTER
Chopped liver
Avatar
15,915 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 2259
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Just South of Ballard
     
Nov 22, 2012 12:21 |  #2

These images are maintaining the 24" to right of target dot aiming spot, but changing deflector distance
5 - 4 sections (3.5 inches)
6 - 3 sections (2.5 inches)
7 - 2 sections (1.75 inches)
5

IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE

6
IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE

7
IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE

Would you like to buy a vowel?
Go ahead, spin the wheel.
flickr (external link)
I'm accross the canal just south of Ballard, the town Seattle usurped in 1907.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
windpig
THREAD ­ STARTER
Chopped liver
Avatar
15,915 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 2259
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Just South of Ballard
     
Nov 22, 2012 12:22 |  #3

These images give you an idea of the spread using the above set up. 2 stand offs.
In image 8 the dot to the left of target is 12" from target
In image 9 the dot to the right of target is 24" from target
Illumination is the same from 12" left of target across to 12" right of target. 24" right of target is about -.2/10 stops.

8

IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE


9
IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE

Would you like to buy a vowel?
Go ahead, spin the wheel.
flickr (external link)
I'm accross the canal just south of Ballard, the town Seattle usurped in 1907.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
windpig
THREAD ­ STARTER
Chopped liver
Avatar
15,915 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 2259
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Just South of Ballard
     
Nov 22, 2012 12:23 |  #4

These images are with the BD unchanged, subject is placed in front of target dot.
I metered 10 for proper exposure, but not 11 or 12, I left power and camera settings the same as 10, I wanted to illustrate the change in output with the change in deflector distance.
13 is metered for proper exposure.

10 - metered 2 sections
11 - unmetered 3 sections
12 - unmetered 4 sections
13 - metered 4 sections

10

IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE

11
IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE

12
IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE

13
IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE

Would you like to buy a vowel?
Go ahead, spin the wheel.
flickr (external link)
I'm accross the canal just south of Ballard, the town Seattle usurped in 1907.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
windpig
THREAD ­ STARTER
Chopped liver
Avatar
15,915 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 2259
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Just South of Ballard
     
Nov 22, 2012 13:53 |  #5

For the heck of it, I threw my speedlight adapter on and shot these with the Kacey BD. The front of the speed light is about 1.5 inches outside the BD (meaning it is not projecting into the dish). Same distance, angle and feathering as above. At 42" from subject, it's not what I would consider a good representation of true BD lighting, but it gives you an idea of the hotspot ring, and spread. Besides, the mankin has alien skin ;-)a

14 - 2 sections of the standoffs, 1.75 inches from back of the dish
15 - 4 sections of the standoffs, 3.5 inches from the back of the dish

14

IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE

15
IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE

Would you like to buy a vowel?
Go ahead, spin the wheel.
flickr (external link)
I'm accross the canal just south of Ballard, the town Seattle usurped in 1907.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bobbyz
Cream of the Crop
20,506 posts
Likes: 3479
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Bay Area, CA
     
Nov 22, 2012 19:25 |  #6

I like the fall off with 2 sections in image 10.


Fuji XT-1, 18-55mm
Sony A7rIV, , Tamron 28-200mm, Sigma 40mm f1.4 Art FE, Sony 85mm f1.8 FE, Sigma 105mm f1.4 Art FE
Fuji GFX50s, 23mm f4, 32-64mm, 45mm f2.8, 110mm f2, 120mm f4 macro
Canon 24mm TSE-II, 85mm f1.2 L II, 90mm TSE-II Macro, 300mm f2.8 IS I

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cbknight
Goldmember
Avatar
1,767 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Aug 2009
Location: East Texas
     
Nov 22, 2012 20:12 |  #7

Not one image of series with eye contact from the model ruins it for me. LOL

I am with Bobby. Love the falloff of image 10 although 13 may be a little softer.


Craig
4K Photography Studio
[/URL]

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DDL
Senior Member
453 posts
Likes: 25
Joined Jan 2009
Location: Alberta, Canada
     
Nov 22, 2012 20:55 |  #8

windpig wrote in post #15276726 (external link)
For the heck of it, I threw my speedlight adapter on and shot these with the Kacey BD. The front of the speed light is about 1.5 inches outside the BD (meaning it is not projecting into the dish). Same distance, angle and feathering as above. At 42" from subject, it's not what I would consider a good representation of true BD lighting, but it gives you an idea of the hotspot ring, and spread. Besides, the mankin has alien skin ;-)a

14 - 2 sections of the standoffs, 1.75 inches from back of the dish
15 - 4 sections of the standoffs, 3.5 inches from the back of the dish

I too have the Kacey BD used with speedlites (dual bracket with 580EXs). I am thinking of attaching something reflective and convex to the side of the deflector facing the speedlites. In my mind a lot of the light from the flashes is hitting the deflector plate straight on and being bounced back directly at the flash instead of being scattered about inside the dish to be re-directed out the front. The flat plate isn't as much of an issue with a strobe due to the light radiating in all directions from the bulb but a flash with light already concentrated through a fresnel lens doesn't appear to scatter as much - maybe I should have used the flash's diffuser to get a better light spread.


DDL

GearList

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
windpig
THREAD ­ STARTER
Chopped liver
Avatar
15,915 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 2259
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Just South of Ballard
     
Nov 22, 2012 21:23 |  #9

Hi guys

I hope all have been enjoying Thanksgiving.

Regarding the speedlight placement. I used a new bracket and I need an adapter to allow me to get the light further into the dish to add that look to the test. The speedlight test was a quick after thought.


Would you like to buy a vowel?
Go ahead, spin the wheel.
flickr (external link)
I'm accross the canal just south of Ballard, the town Seattle usurped in 1907.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FJ ­ LOVE
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,883 posts
Likes: 82
Joined Nov 2006
Location: barrie ont. ca
     
Nov 22, 2012 22:29 |  #10

TMR Design wrote in post #13398980 (external link)
This is a continuation of a discussion on the Seniors image image thread.
How much effect does the proximity of the deflector to flash tube make?

aaron.dunlap wrote in post #14501589 (external link)
i sure hope you're OK Rob

hi guys :D


DILLIGAF about your bicycle or your gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
windpig
THREAD ­ STARTER
Chopped liver
Avatar
15,915 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 2259
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Just South of Ballard
     
Nov 22, 2012 22:47 |  #11

Liar, liar, pants on fire.


Would you like to buy a vowel?
Go ahead, spin the wheel.
flickr (external link)
I'm accross the canal just south of Ballard, the town Seattle usurped in 1907.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kenyee
Senior Member
981 posts
Joined Feb 2009
Location: Boston, PRofMA
     
Nov 24, 2012 20:37 |  #12

4-5 seem to have a weird ring at the edge?


Pentax K20D, 77Ltd, 43Ltd, Sigma 17-70, 60-250/4, crapload of Strobist gear (SB28's, RP JrX Studios, Einsteins, WL, Speedo BD, softboxes, grids, etc.)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
windpig
THREAD ­ STARTER
Chopped liver
Avatar
15,915 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 2259
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Just South of Ballard
     
Nov 24, 2012 23:00 |  #13

The weird ring was the reason for the tests. It shows the direct flash seen between the dish and the deflector.


Would you like to buy a vowel?
Go ahead, spin the wheel.
flickr (external link)
I'm accross the canal just south of Ballard, the town Seattle usurped in 1907.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,420 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4508
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Nov 25, 2012 10:45 |  #14

The greater problem that is apparent in 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 are the multiple concentric shadow 'steps' cast by the subject which are visible, with decreasing density as they move out farther from the subject. Only photo 15 doesn't have this distracting shadow characteristic. But photo 15 adds the problem of the very bright outer area of illumination of the background.


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
windpig
THREAD ­ STARTER
Chopped liver
Avatar
15,915 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 2259
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Just South of Ballard
     
Nov 25, 2012 11:01 |  #15

Wilt wrote in post #15286752 (external link)
Only photo 15 doesn't have this distracting shadow characteristic. But photo 15 adds the problem of the very bright outer area of illumination of the background.

Hi Wilt

Photo 15 is how I shoot the BD. Dealing with the ring on the background winds up like dealing with any hard edge modifier, I either feather only so far to keep the edge/ring off the BG, change the BG distance, shoot outside and/or do what ever it takes.

I noticed the double edge shadow when I first got the BD and notice quite often in glamor and beauty images. Umbra/Preumbra thingy.


Would you like to buy a vowel?
Go ahead, spin the wheel.
flickr (external link)
I'm accross the canal just south of Ballard, the town Seattle usurped in 1907.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,131 views & 0 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it.
Kacey 22" BD deflector test
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer
1304 guests, 114 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.