Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Astronomy & Celestial 
Thread started 23 Nov 2012 (Friday) 08:47
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Clear night stars - My first attempt

 
JGunn
Senior Member
Avatar
694 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 209
Joined Aug 2012
Location: Macon, GA, USA
     
Nov 23, 2012 08:47 |  #1

The last few nights it has been incredibly clear and the stars have been crisp and bright. I have not tried much in terms of astrophotography before, but with these conditions I had to give it a try.

IMAGE: http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8209/8211430682_5757eb1cf2.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …s/gunnerphoto/8​211430682/  (external link)
An Astro First (external link) by Gunner's Photography (external link), on Flickr

This was done with my 60D, 100mm f/2.8L with two stacked photos to try and reduce some of the noise. After processing, I ended up with some really interesting colors. I think astrophotography is something that could definitely grow on me, I am just scared by the cost of all the new gadgets that are out there.

Any suggestions on processing would be greatly appreciated. Thanks for looking.

J.Gunn - Macon, GA, USA
flickr (external link)
1D X; 1D MkIV | 16-35mm f/2.8L; 100mm f/2.8L IS; 400mm f/2.8 IS; 2x extender; Kenko DG Ext Tubes

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Celestron
Cream of the Crop
8,641 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 406
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Texas USA
     
Nov 23, 2012 11:04 |  #2

M45 the Pleiades you got there . Best you could do here is try editing the red out and watch your BP , don't clip it . IMHO you have over processed this image . Can you post the original ?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JGunn
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
694 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 209
Joined Aug 2012
Location: Macon, GA, USA
     
Nov 23, 2012 21:23 |  #3

Certainly. Will be back home in a few days.
I have little experience with the processing side of star shots, but found the red interesting.


J.Gunn - Macon, GA, USA
flickr (external link)
1D X; 1D MkIV | 16-35mm f/2.8L; 100mm f/2.8L IS; 400mm f/2.8 IS; 2x extender; Kenko DG Ext Tubes

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rick_reno
Cream of the Crop
44,648 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 155
Joined Dec 2010
     
Nov 23, 2012 22:23 |  #4

i liked the red too, had no idea it wasn't supposed to be there.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Celestron
Cream of the Crop
8,641 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 406
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Texas USA
     
Nov 24, 2012 14:53 |  #5

The red is mostly all noise . That's why your editing brought it out so well . Here is a link to Nighthound that is a member here . It's a perfect example of M45 :

http://s3.beta.photobu​cket.com …chxx2.jpg.html?​sort=6&o=2 (external link)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JGunn
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
694 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 209
Joined Aug 2012
Location: Macon, GA, USA
     
Nov 24, 2012 15:00 |  #6

Very interesting. When processing, once I adjusted the brightness, the red started to appear. I liked how it looked, and as I do not know the stars at all, I did not know it was not supposed to be there. Once I get back home, I will clean it up and repost.


J.Gunn - Macon, GA, USA
flickr (external link)
1D X; 1D MkIV | 16-35mm f/2.8L; 100mm f/2.8L IS; 400mm f/2.8 IS; 2x extender; Kenko DG Ext Tubes

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Trace
Senior Member
Avatar
973 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 127
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Mannum - South Australia
     
Nov 24, 2012 16:21 |  #7

Celestron wrote in post #15283876 (external link)
The red is mostly all noise . That's why your editing brought it out so well . Here is a link to Nighthound that is a member here . It's a perfect example of M45 :

http://s3.beta.photobu​cket.com …chxx2.jpg.html?​sort=6&o=2 (external link)

I wouldn't compare JGunn's against Nightbound's - their equipment, skills and techniques are worlds apart. There must be someone with similar equipment. Try the 'You don't need a telescope' thread.


Trace
A camera, some lenses and a bag to put stuff in
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/83414368@N00/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Celestron
Cream of the Crop
8,641 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 406
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Texas USA
     
Nov 24, 2012 18:32 |  #8

Trace wrote in post #15284111 (external link)
I wouldn't compare JGunn's against Nightbound's - their equipment, skills and techniques are worlds apart. There must be someone with similar equipment. Try the 'You don't need a telescope' thread.


I wasn't comparing skills for skills . I was posting a picture for him to see what it is suppose to look like . If you miss-interpreted something there then you may not be alone . Alot of ppl do but i just come across as easy as i can . The way i see it is if your going to do astro-photography then you should at least research and find out how things are suppose to be , this is what educates you knowing how it should be without guessing what your camera is interpreting to you . Night imaging is just like the statement , "It's like Night and Day" , totally different than what you expect . Not pointing out anyone in particular , just saying that people who want to do astro-photography should study on it some the same way they study how to take day time shots and make improvements . Hopefully i have enlighted you some on astrophotography . Have a nice day !

BTW you have alot of beautiful images on your Flickr page but no astro-shots . I'm sure you had to do quite alot of learning to get that good . Have you ever compared any of your today shots to some back when you begin doing photography ? I have and they were terrible but what i have now is also not the best of anything either . ;)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Trace
Senior Member
Avatar
973 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 127
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Mannum - South Australia
     
Nov 24, 2012 20:47 |  #9

Celestron wrote in post #15284579 (external link)
I wasn't comparing skills for skills . I was posting a picture for him to see what it is suppose to look like . If you miss-interpreted something there then you may not be alone . Alot of ppl do but i just come across as easy as i can . The way i see it is if your going to do astro-photography then you should at least research and find out how things are suppose to be , this is what educates you knowing how it should be without guessing what your camera is interpreting to you . Night imaging is just like the statement , "It's like Night and Day" , totally different than what you expect . Not pointing out anyone in particular , just saying that people who want to do astro-photography should study on it some the same way they study how to take day time shots and make improvements . Hopefully i have enlighted you some on astrophotography . Have a nice day !

BTW you have alot of beautiful images on your Flickr page but no astro-shots . I'm sure you had to do quite alot of learning to get that good . Have you ever compared any of your today shots to some back when you begin doing photography ? I have and they were terrible but what i have now is also not the best of anything either . ;)

Yep spot on I'd say. Astro is something I'm interested and as you allude to I'm learning by surfing at this stage. Thanks for the comment on my images. Hope to do some astro stuff soon.

Cheers Trace


Trace
A camera, some lenses and a bag to put stuff in
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/83414368@N00/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,913 views & 0 likes for this thread, 4 members have posted to it.
Clear night stars - My first attempt
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Astronomy & Celestial 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1210 guests, 110 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.