I was just curious as to whether clients might get upset or anything of the sorts if a photographer was shooting weddings with rebels but have excellent fast glass and good off camera lighting and an understanding of lighting? The reason why I'm asking this is because I feel as though there isn't much quality difference between 1.6X crop factor DSLR's and FF's.
I was thinking about eventually upgrading my 450D to a T3i and having two T3i's at hand one with a 17-55 2.8 and the second with a 70-200 2.8.
Reason being is that the extra 6mp's give me better printing capability's and more cropping/low light noise capability's and it has way better low light capability's than my 450D so it would b worth the small price premium vs say getting 60D's/7D's. All of these cameras have the same very accurate and f 2.8 center af point so that's all that I would be using with all of these cameras anyways but the extra mega pixels, reduced high iso noise, and higher iso capability's would lead to me upgrade to them.