Hunters won. I just received news that the Lamar Canyon Alpha Female, the famous "06" female with collar in the photos in this threat, has just been shot and killed by a Wyoming hunter. What a sad day for wildlife.
Dec 07, 2012 14:28 | #16 Hunters won. I just received news that the Lamar Canyon Alpha Female, the famous "06" female with collar in the photos in this threat, has just been shot and killed by a Wyoming hunter. What a sad day for wildlife. lnguyen1203, Canon 1DX, 5D3, T3i, 500L f4 II, 70-300L f4.0-5.6, 16-35L f2.8, 1.4X II, 2X III
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mike55 Goldmember 4,206 posts Likes: 9 Joined Jun 2007 Location: Chicago, Illinois More info | Dec 07, 2012 16:07 | #17 Very sad news, and a major defeat for the national parks. 6D | 70D | 24-105 L IS | 17-40 L | 300 F4 L IS | 50 1.8 II | 1.4x II | LR5 | HV30 | bug spray | wilderness
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sparker1 Cream of the Crop 29,368 posts Likes: 295 Joined Nov 2004 Location: Sierra Vista, AZ More info | Dec 10, 2012 09:09 | #18 Legal or not, I am opposed to the killing of animals just for the fun of it, or even under the umbrella of "protecting my livestock". I admit to doing some hunting in my youth, but the older I get, the more sympathy I have for animals. Human efforts to "manage" animals usually fail miserably. Stan (See my gallery at http://www.pbase.com/sparker1
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ScottM Goldmember More info | Dec 11, 2012 10:01 | #19 Thanks for sharing these photos. It saddens me to hear of the killings of members of the pack. On our last visit to the park in 2011, we only glimpsed this pack at a great distance -- not close enough for any photos. Now it looks like the pack will be gone when we return for our next visit.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 11, 2012 10:47 | #20 Scott M wrote in post #15353073 Thanks for sharing these photos. It saddens me to hear of the killings of members of the pack. On our last visit to the park in 2011, we only glimpsed this pack at a great distance -- not close enough for any photos. Now it looks like the pack will be gone when we return for our next visit. There have been tons of outcries and news of the collared wolves kileld have spread around the world. The NY Times and ABCnews.com also picked it up. There was a hearing yesterday in Montana with many people from both sides speakign. There were even hunters who spoke to support a buffer zone around Yellowstone. The upshot of all this is Montana Fish and Wildlife voted 4-1 to shut down hunting and trapping (which has not started yet) in the zones surrounding Yellowstone. So we can all hope for the best. lnguyen1203, Canon 1DX, 5D3, T3i, 500L f4 II, 70-300L f4.0-5.6, 16-35L f2.8, 1.4X II, 2X III
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dlpasco Goldmember 1,143 posts Joined Dec 2006 Location: Sheridan, Wyoming More info | Dec 11, 2012 11:06 | #21 If you are going to take a position on the killing of wolves then please make it an informed position. Some of us live where these "re-introduced" wolves now live. Dan
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mike55 Goldmember 4,206 posts Likes: 9 Joined Jun 2007 Location: Chicago, Illinois More info | Dec 11, 2012 16:54 | #22 dlpasco wrote in post #15353328 I It is one thing to view wolves from the comfort of a Chicago residence and quite another to have wolves in your backyard. Actually I just got back from forty tent nights in Montana, from late September until November 1. I didn't see too many other Montana's in the mountains at that time, especially with the snow and sub-freezing temperatures. In fact, I was in Glacier when they closed it down on the east side. I did encounter a few at the local Wal Mart, though. I spend more time listening to and being near wolves in that state than most people do. I've woken up to wolves howling within a hundred yards of my tent. I've heard them pacing around me in the snowy woods, too. Not once was I afraid of them, because if you look at the science, there's no reason to be. Wolves are a necessary species, alwyas have been. There are very few wolves in the Northern Rockies, about 1600 before these hunts started. That's 1600 animals over close to 300,000 square miles. There are many locals who use the wolf as a "venting" symbol, or as something to blame for their poor decisions in life. Thus, you get the largely anti-science actions of the emotional. There is no scientific reason for shooting wolves in the Northern Rockies. And as we see today, Montana FWP just initiated a buffer around Yellowstone. Hunters and trappers were the ones who wiped out wolves in the west. Now they're proving the inability to properly manage them once more. I'm not surprised. 6D | 70D | 24-105 L IS | 17-40 L | 300 F4 L IS | 50 1.8 II | 1.4x II | LR5 | HV30 | bug spray | wilderness
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dlpasco Goldmember 1,143 posts Joined Dec 2006 Location: Sheridan, Wyoming More info | Dec 11, 2012 17:45 | #23 Mike55 wrote in post #15354773 Actually I just got back from forty tent nights in Montana, from late September until November 1. I didn't see too many other Montana's in the mountains at that time, especially with the snow and sub-freezing temperatures. In fact, I was in Glacier when they closed it down on the east side. I did encounter a few at the local Wal Mart, though. ![]() I spend more time listening to and being near wolves in that state than most people do. I've woken up to wolves howling within a hundred yards of my tent. I've heard them pacing around me in the snowy woods, too. Not once was I afraid of them, because if you look at the science, there's no reason to be. Wolves are a necessary species, alwyas have been. There are very few wolves in the Northern Rockies, about 1600 before these hunts started. That's 1600 animals over close to 300,000 square miles. There are many locals who use the wolf as a "venting" symbol, or as something to blame for their poor decisions in life. Thus, you get the largely anti-science actions of the emotional. There is no scientific reason for shooting wolves in the Northern Rockies. And as we see today, Montana FWP just initiated a buffer around Yellowstone. Hunters and trappers were the ones who wiped out wolves in the west. Now they're proving the inability to properly manage them once more. I'm not surprised. As with a great many things, I suspect we agree on more than we disagree. Wolves are a necessary species in Yellowstone. For many decades there was a hole in the predator population and, as a result, prey species proliferated. To manage the population of prey species in Yellowstone, wildlife managers resorted to mass killings. With no hunting allowed there was no good alternative. Wolves are filling that void and a more healthy balance between predator and prey is the result. Of course there is some discord - elk populations outside of the park have plummeted but that may be temporary as the overall health of the elk improves. Dan
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2015 guests, 131 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||