Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
Thread started 28 Nov 2012 (Wednesday) 07:37
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Issue with CPL Filter

 
Apricane
Shooting the breeze
Avatar
2,086 posts
Gallery: 93 photos
Likes: 4596
Joined Nov 2011
Location: Canada's Federal Capital
     
Nov 28, 2012 07:37 |  #1

When I use my B+W Käsemann filter with my 15-85, depending on the rotation angle I use on the CPL, the image IQ (in terms of sharpness) can be seriously degraded, whereas when I rotate differently it's 100% perfectly sharp + the gorgeous polarizing effects.

At first, I thought this might have something to do with the filter being unclean, but it turns out that is true both before and after having cleaned it with the Zeiss cleaner+microfiber.

Is it possible that it would be caused only by having received a bad copy? This is something I'd like to clear up before proceeding to buy a replacement filter+a filter for my 60mm.


Apricane flickr (external link) IG Travel/Street (external link)
a7 IV | Ʃ 35+85/1.4 Art | SY 135/1.8 | Tmr 28-200 | Tmr 70-180/2.8 | Sony 70-350G
X-T30 | XF18-55 | XF16-80 | Ʃ 56/1.4
Capture One 23 Pro | Affinity Photo

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rick_reno
Cream of the Crop
44,648 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 155
Joined Dec 2010
     
Nov 28, 2012 07:51 |  #2

Could you post a couple of sample shots? I'd like to see this.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Apricane
THREAD ­ STARTER
Shooting the breeze
Avatar
2,086 posts
Gallery: 93 photos
Likes: 4596
Joined Nov 2011
Location: Canada's Federal Capital
     
Nov 28, 2012 07:53 |  #3

Not really, since I deleted them. They're just fuzzy as if they had been taken with a cheap filter, nothing special in and of itself.


Apricane flickr (external link) IG Travel/Street (external link)
a7 IV | Ʃ 35+85/1.4 Art | SY 135/1.8 | Tmr 28-200 | Tmr 70-180/2.8 | Sony 70-350G
X-T30 | XF18-55 | XF16-80 | Ʃ 56/1.4
Capture One 23 Pro | Affinity Photo

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jon
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
69,628 posts
Likes: 227
Joined Jun 2004
Location: Bethesda, MD USA
     
Nov 28, 2012 08:27 |  #4

Did you get a Linear Polarizer or a Circular Polarizer? Linears can interfere with the AF system's partially-reflecting mirror at some angles, so aren't recommended for use with DSLRs.


Jon
----------
Cocker Spaniels
Maryland and Virginia activities
Image Posting Rules and Image Posting FAQ
Report SPAM, Don't Answer It! (link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.
PAYPAL GIFT NO LONGER ALLOWED HERE

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Apricane
THREAD ­ STARTER
Shooting the breeze
Avatar
2,086 posts
Gallery: 93 photos
Likes: 4596
Joined Nov 2011
Location: Canada's Federal Capital
     
Nov 28, 2012 09:52 |  #5

It's a circular polarizer.


Apricane flickr (external link) IG Travel/Street (external link)
a7 IV | Ʃ 35+85/1.4 Art | SY 135/1.8 | Tmr 28-200 | Tmr 70-180/2.8 | Sony 70-350G
X-T30 | XF18-55 | XF16-80 | Ʃ 56/1.4
Capture One 23 Pro | Affinity Photo

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ben_r_
-POTN's Three legged Support-
Avatar
15,894 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Sacramento, CA
     
Nov 29, 2012 12:05 |  #6

Where did you buy it from?


[Gear List | Flickr (external link) | My Reviews] /|\ Tripod Leg Protection (external link) /|\
GIVE a man a fish and he'll eat for a day. TEACH a man to fish and he'll eat for a lifetime.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
T2i4me
Goldmember
Avatar
2,906 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Jun 2011
Location: Surf City, CA
     
Nov 29, 2012 13:03 |  #7

First question are you using the CPL on top of a clear filter or directly over the lens?

I have to doubt it's the filter, Keep in mind the light angle can increase or decrease the polarization effect. When shooting at 15mm you might see a blotchy sky due to the large field of view. I would suggest uing a tripod as the polarizer reduces light and can bring down the shutter speed allowing motion blur. As noted sharing examples is always helpful.


-- Eric --
6DMKII - 5DC - 80D - 70-200 F2.8 IS III - 100-400 L IS - 70-200 F4 L - 17-40 L - EF 85 1.8 - EF-S 10-22 - EF-S 15-85 IS - EF-S 18-135 USM IS - EF-S 60 macro - 430EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SkipD
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,476 posts
Likes: 165
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Southeastern WI, USA
     
Nov 29, 2012 13:38 |  #8

Apricane wrote in post #15299637 (external link)
It's a circular polarizer.

Have you proven that?

The easiest way to be absolutely sure that a polarizer is circular vs. linear is to hold the filter up between you and a mirror.

You want to be holding the filter so that, in the mirror, it covers the eye that you'd be using to look through the filter. Thus, you are looking through the filter twice to see your eye in the mirror. Then flip-flop the filter so you are looking at the other side of it.

If you have a linear polarizer, you will be able to see your eye in the mirror with the filter held both ways.

If it's a circular polarizer, you will see it blacked out in one direction and in the other direction you'll be able to see your eye in the mirror.


Skip Douglas
A few cameras and over 50 years behind them .....
..... but still learning all the time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
NU27D
Senior Member
464 posts
Joined Dec 2010
     
Nov 29, 2012 14:06 |  #9

SkipD wrote in post #15304760 (external link)
Have you proven that?

The easiest way to be absolutely sure that a polarizer is circular vs. linear is to hold the filter up between you and a mirror.

You want to be holding the filter so that, in the mirror, it covers the eye that you'd be using to look through the filter. Thus, you are looking through the filter twice to see your eye in the mirror. Then flip-flop the filter so you are looking at the other side of it.

If you have a linear polarizer, you will be able to see your eye in the mirror with the filter held both ways.

If it's a circular polarizer, you will see it blacked out in one direction and in the other direction you'll be able to see your eye in the mirror.

Just tried it...It works! ;)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Apricane
THREAD ­ STARTER
Shooting the breeze
Avatar
2,086 posts
Gallery: 93 photos
Likes: 4596
Joined Nov 2011
Location: Canada's Federal Capital
     
Nov 29, 2012 17:16 |  #10

I'm using the CPL (which is a B+W Kaesemann bought new from B&H) directly in front of the lens.

And I've tried SkipD's test, and it is really a circular polarizer (but out of curiosity, wouldn't all filters that you screw on to the lens be circular? I feel stupid asking the question, but I kinda have to now!).

The issue I have with the polarizer is not that it doesn't polarize (I'm pretty sure the polarizing effects work perfectly according to sunlight conditions), but that it renders the image fuzzy when turning it in certain positions.

I'm also pretty sure it's not an issue with focusing either: when I tested it, I tried four positions (90 degrees, 180 degrees, 270 degrees, and 0/360 degrees - the last position which I consider to be the 'original' position, pretty much corresponding to the max polarization effect), and in all but the max polarization effect, part of the image is fuzzy (either the left side or the right side, sometimes even the center of the frame - and along the focus plane). I tested with my 15-85 at 50-60mm, focal lengths where it is considered to normally be quite sharp even wide open. (I know the 15-85 performs unevenly for corner sharpness, but I've used it extensively enough to assume the filter, and not the lens, is the problem.)

What I really want to know is if anyone else ever had such a problem, if I might have gotten a bad copy of a filter (as unlikely as it sounds), in order to buy another with which I hopefully won't have the same problem.


Apricane flickr (external link) IG Travel/Street (external link)
a7 IV | Ʃ 35+85/1.4 Art | SY 135/1.8 | Tmr 28-200 | Tmr 70-180/2.8 | Sony 70-350G
X-T30 | XF18-55 | XF16-80 | Ʃ 56/1.4
Capture One 23 Pro | Affinity Photo

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rklepper
Dignity-Esteem-Compassion
Avatar
9,019 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 14
Joined Dec 2003
Location: No longer living at the center of the known universe, moved just slightly to the right. Iowa, USA.
     
Nov 29, 2012 18:25 |  #11

Really to discuss this in any kind of a sensible manner you will need to go out and take some photos to post. Otherwise everyone is just stabbing in the dark here.


Doc Klepper in the USA
I
am a photorealist, I like my photos with a touch of what was actually there.
Polite C&C always welcome, Thanks. Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Apricane
THREAD ­ STARTER
Shooting the breeze
Avatar
2,086 posts
Gallery: 93 photos
Likes: 4596
Joined Nov 2011
Location: Canada's Federal Capital
     
Nov 29, 2012 18:31 |  #12

rklepper wrote in post #15305945 (external link)
Really to discuss this in any kind of a sensible manner you will need to go out and take some photos to post. Otherwise everyone is just stabbing in the dark here.

Honestly, I don't know what's unclear about pictures that are fuzzy as if they were taken with a cheap UV filter. It's not like I'm like talking about some kind of arcane effect no one's ever heard of.

That being said, I might be able to take some on Sunday.


Apricane flickr (external link) IG Travel/Street (external link)
a7 IV | Ʃ 35+85/1.4 Art | SY 135/1.8 | Tmr 28-200 | Tmr 70-180/2.8 | Sony 70-350G
X-T30 | XF18-55 | XF16-80 | Ʃ 56/1.4
Capture One 23 Pro | Affinity Photo

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jon
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
69,628 posts
Likes: 227
Joined Jun 2004
Location: Bethesda, MD USA
     
Nov 29, 2012 18:41 |  #13

A circular polarizer refers to how the light is polarized, not to the shape of the filter. Linear polarizers just polarize the light (remove all parts of the light ray that aren't vibrating in one specific direction), and leave it that way. Circular polarizers, through use of a "1/4 wavelength wedge" essentially "depolarize" the light that is passed through, so it seems to be unpolarized to anything behind it.

It would really help if you'd post a picture showing maximum fuzziness, and another of he same scene with the polarizer turned at 90 deg. to that setting.


Jon
----------
Cocker Spaniels
Maryland and Virginia activities
Image Posting Rules and Image Posting FAQ
Report SPAM, Don't Answer It! (link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.
PAYPAL GIFT NO LONGER ALLOWED HERE

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LV ­ Moose
Moose gets blamed for everything.
Avatar
23,434 posts
Gallery: 223 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 4798
Joined Dec 2008
     
Nov 29, 2012 18:47 as a reply to  @ Jon's post |  #14

Is it authentic B+W? Any chance you got a fake? Get it from China, perhaps?


Moose

Gear... Flickr (external link)...Flickr 2 (external link)...
Macro (external link)...Hummingbirds (external link)
Aircraft (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SkipD
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,476 posts
Likes: 165
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Southeastern WI, USA
     
Nov 29, 2012 18:48 |  #15

Apricane wrote in post #15305958 (external link)
Honestly, I don't know what's unclear about pictures that are fuzzy as if they were taken with a cheap UV filter.

Might you be stacking filters?

Some folks leave a UV filter attached to a lens all the time and add any other filters they want to use for the filter's effect. This is not a good thing to do.


Skip Douglas
A few cameras and over 50 years behind them .....
..... but still learning all the time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,095 views & 0 likes for this thread, 12 members have posted to it.
Issue with CPL Filter
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1674 guests, 139 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.