peter_n wrote in post #15302507
The 1444T sports a 2lb higher max load spec but a max height that is 2.79 inches shorter than the 1542T. The max height without the center column extended is identical and the 1544T is slightly lighter in weight so the total max height difference must be a shorter center column.
So here we have the incredible shrinking tripod. I thought the 1541T was already a bit too short, then the 1542T came along that was shorter than that and now the current model is even shorter. What is Gitzo playing at?
I think you might have misread the specs. The 1542T is longer than the 1541T in every way. All 3 models also have the exact same load capacity.
From the Gitzo site:
GT1541T:
Max Height: 55.12 in
Max Height with Center Column Down: 44.49 in
Closed Length: 16.14
Load Capacity: 17.64
GT1542T:
Max Height: 58.66 in
Max Height with Center Column Down: 45.87 in
Closed Length: 16.73
Load Capacity: 17.64
GT1544T:
Max Height: 55.91 in
Max Height with Center Column Down: 45.87
Closed Length: 16.73
Load Capacity: 17.64
I'm perplexed by the closed length. The GT1541T has gotten rave reviews here and elsewhere. Then the GT1542T came out, but its closed position had the center column extending past the legs (ballhead juts out instead of being nestled between the legs), resulting in a longer closed length than its predecessor. Many people and reviews listed the longer closed length as a big negative (less compact = less ideal for travel!) and it seems like most still regard the GT1541T as superior.
My question is, what the heck is the point of the GT1544T? It's max length is shorter than the GT1542T, but its closed length is still just as long? Double disadvantage??
I feel like I'm missing some crucial info here about the GT1544T that would justify it being a successor model, as I don't see any advantage right now...