200 f2!!!!
Would you still get it if you shot wildlife and very little portrait?

dgrPhotos Cream of the Crop More info | Feb 14, 2013 12:02 | #8776 iLvision wrote in post #15609603 200 f2!!!! Would you still get it if you shot wildlife and very little portrait?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
natalieerachel Senior Member 694 posts Likes: 1 Joined Sep 2012 Location: NYC More info | Feb 14, 2013 12:06 | #8777 laxlife1234 wrote in post #15608088 ![]() //Serious + Brenizer ![]() Dina ~Brenizer~ Loooove your post processing! Do you mind explaining a little about what you do?? NatalieFong.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
natalieerachel Senior Member 694 posts Likes: 1 Joined Sep 2012 Location: NYC More info | Feb 14, 2013 12:07 | #8778 MOkoFOko wrote in post #15607297 If you've got a wifi-enabled camera--such as a newer Nex--you can manually control focus directly from your phone No waay!! I have the 7D, is that wifi enabled? NatalieFong.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
*sigh* Hardware Master (or something like that) 25,131 posts Likes: 45 Joined Feb 2011 Location: Phoenix, AZ More info | Feb 14, 2013 12:46 | #8779 natalieerachel wrote in post #15609787 No waay!! I have the 7D, is that wifi enabled? No.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
natalieerachel Senior Member 694 posts Likes: 1 Joined Sep 2012 Location: NYC More info | Feb 14, 2013 12:47 | #8780 *sigh* wrote in post #15609899 No. Ahh I had a feeling...haha I'm trying to save up money for new lenses rather than new bodies, so I suppose I will have to deal with it for now :/ NatalieFong.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
vipergts831 Has the TF retired? Or just being utterly lazy? 44,159 posts Gallery: 42 photos Likes: 561 Joined Apr 2009 Location: Taking better shots with an iPhone than MDJAK with a 1DX More info | Feb 14, 2013 12:49 | #8781 dgrPhotos wrote in post #15609769 Would you still get it if you shot wildlife and very little portrait? Too short even with a 2x. -Omar- Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
*sigh* Hardware Master (or something like that) 25,131 posts Likes: 45 Joined Feb 2011 Location: Phoenix, AZ More info | Feb 14, 2013 12:51 | #8782 |
vipergts831 Has the TF retired? Or just being utterly lazy? 44,159 posts Gallery: 42 photos Likes: 561 Joined Apr 2009 Location: Taking better shots with an iPhone than MDJAK with a 1DX More info | Feb 14, 2013 12:51 | #8783 natalieerachel wrote in post #15609787 No waay!! I have the 7D, is that wifi enabled? It could be -Omar- Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
vipergts831 Has the TF retired? Or just being utterly lazy? 44,159 posts Gallery: 42 photos Likes: 561 Joined Apr 2009 Location: Taking better shots with an iPhone than MDJAK with a 1DX More info | Feb 14, 2013 12:54 | #8784 *sigh* wrote in post #15609920 Dangit, D800 refurbs have gone up $200-300 in price... Looks like I'll be going new after all. I would just buy it off someone. Those things have been coming on the boards for sale at 2200 basically mint all the time. Like this one -Omar- Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dgrPhotos Cream of the Crop More info | Feb 14, 2013 12:55 | #8785 vipergts831 wrote in post #15609913 Too short even with a 2x. The 200 get's high praise from bloggers with the 2x. 400mm seems to be that sweet spot for wildlife shooting.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
natalieerachel Senior Member 694 posts Likes: 1 Joined Sep 2012 Location: NYC More info | Feb 14, 2013 13:04 | #8786 You know, that's actually reeeeally cool! Too bad I don't have $300 laying around anywhere... NatalieFong.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
D.Vance Goldmember 4,163 posts Likes: 12 Joined Jan 2011 Location: VA More info | Feb 14, 2013 13:27 | #8787 dgrPhotos wrote in post #15609931 The 200 get's high praise from bloggers with the 2x. 400mm seems to be that sweet spot for wildlife shooting. I don't think so. 400 is WAY too short on FF. I wonder if the video editors on The Titanic ever went, "Sorry, I can't right now. I'm busy synching the Titanic..."
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dgrPhotos Cream of the Crop More info | Feb 14, 2013 13:32 | #8788 So 1 vote for the 200 and everyone else who has chimed in thinks the 300?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
vipergts831 Has the TF retired? Or just being utterly lazy? 44,159 posts Gallery: 42 photos Likes: 561 Joined Apr 2009 Location: Taking better shots with an iPhone than MDJAK with a 1DX More info | Feb 14, 2013 13:33 | #8789 dgrPhotos wrote in post #15609931 The 200 get's high praise from bloggers with the 2x. 400mm seems to be that sweet spot for wildlife shooting. Go 600 -Omar- Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
this does not look appropriate :P
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Thunderstream 1765 guests, 102 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||