Canon 70-200 F4 L, and sample pictures.

Thinking of getting the 70-200 mm F4 L lens for my EOS 350D. My Sigma 70-300mm f/4-5.6 APO Zoom Macro Super II dont give me the qulity I want! The pictures are getting so noisy, and unsharp, grainy, hard to explain, for using high ISO 400. So, anyone who have, and want to share some pictures taken with the 70-200 F4 L lens? Will I get better result with the Llens, then with the Sigma 70-300mm f/4-5.6 APO Zoom Macro Super II. A very cheap lens.

So please, sample pictures. I have been looking at pbase, but those are so hard jpeg compressed.

Thank you guys!

/ Johan

I love my Canon 70-200 F4L!!! Hehe, I think there was a post similar to this too. Anyway, here are some samples:

#1

HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO | PHOTOBUCKET ERROR IMAGE

HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO | PHOTOBUCKET ERROR IMAGE

HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO | PHOTOBUCKET ERROR IMAGE

HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO | PHOTOBUCKET ERROR IMAGE

HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO | PHOTOBUCKET ERROR IMAGE

You can't go wrong with this lens.

One of my best:

here's a few from me...I'll really miss this lense as i replaced it with a 100-400mm. It's a great lens.

pic 1
pic 2
pic 3
pic 4

some macro with kenko pro extension tubes
pic 5
pic 6
pic 7

Here are my samples. Both were handheld at f/4

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.

Tyger wrote:
here's a few from me...I'll really miss this lense as i replaced it with a 100-400mm. It's a great lens.

pic 1
pic 2
pic 3
pic 4

some macro with kenko pro extension tubes
pic 5
pic 6
pic 7

Thanks everyone...


The last pictures. Are they taken with a flash? ike the grasshopper, and its great quility on the pictures.

the last 2 yes with the pop up flash...would be better with another flash unit or even better the macro twin lite also handheld. But i'm learning to use a tripod more and more

fantastic pictures everyone,now i really can't wait for mine(it's on its way,yay!! )
keep 'em coming people

May I also ask... Will I get less "grainy" images with this lens? or is that the cameras fault?

Hmm wonder why they don't show up so sharp with photobucket. The original looks great.

Here is 2 I took when I first started photography I had no idea what I was doing so all taken in auto mode,no croping and no pp,These are fight out of the camera.

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.

This review site has sample pictures with both lenses. The reviews are helpful. I just ordered the F 2.8 because it comes with a tripod mount,hood and lens case. It would be $200 more if you buy these for the F 4. For a net $350 difference, gaining one stop and 77mm size seemed like a good idea. http://www.photozone.d​e/8Reviews/index.html

Elton Balch wrote:
This review site has sample pictures with both lenses. The reviews are helpful. I just ordered the F 2.8 because it comes with a tripod mount,hood and lens case. It would be $200 more if you buy these for the F 4. For a net $350 difference, gaining one stop and 77mm size seemed like a good idea. http://www.photozone.d​e/8Reviews/index.html

The f4 also comes with the case and hood. It is so light you do not need a tripod mount.

Taken with my 70-200 f/4.0L

https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=124604
https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=124561

http://www.fototime.co​m/A2214CA748B75B4/orig​.jpg