Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EOS Digital Cameras 
Thread started 30 Nov 2012 (Friday) 18:53
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

-= 6D Owners Unite! Discuss and post Photos!

 
this thread is locked
tmorris804
Senior Member
Avatar
605 posts
Likes: 87
Joined Jul 2012
     
Feb 20, 2013 10:51 as a reply to  @ post 15631770 |  #1591

He's the reserved on in the band


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Canon 6D, Canon 135L, Sigma 50mm 1.4, Canon 17-40L, Canon 40mm 2.8 Pancake, 85mm 1.2 L Mkii, Rokkor 58mm 1.2, Nikkor non ai 24mm 2.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
amyandmark3
Goldmember
Avatar
2,157 posts
Gallery: 242 photos
Likes: 3931
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Rocklin, CA
     
Feb 20, 2013 13:32 |  #1592

Here's a few more from my goose/duck day:

IMAGE: http://markowens.zenfolio.com/img/s8/v79/p1440169190-4.jpg

IMAGE: http://markowens.zenfolio.com/img/s8/v82/p1440169184-4.jpg

IMAGE: http://markowens.zenfolio.com/img/s8/v81/p1440169374-4.jpg

IMAGE: http://markowens.zenfolio.com/img/s2/v73/p1440169352-4.jpg

Mark O.
Gear List & Gallery

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TheManInTheMoon
Member
Avatar
58 posts
Likes: 41
Joined Jul 2012
Location: Houston, Tx
     
Feb 20, 2013 19:02 |  #1593

My 6D kit is arriving tomorrow. I'm stoked...although the weather is going to be nasty the rest of the week. Upgrading from the 60D to the 6D is going to be a nice little upgrade. You guys have posted some amazing photos...it's quite inspiring.


Everyone has a photographic memory. Some don't have film.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pdyliacco
Junior Member
21 posts
Joined Dec 2012
Location: Cainta, Rizal, Philippines
     
Feb 20, 2013 21:21 |  #1594

My first post

IMAGE: https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-Zt9x3C1k6cM/USS2r7QAanI/AAAAAAAAs_M/ADOdj7rcAlk/s1325/IMG_5718.jpg
Exposure: 0.006 sec (1/180)
Lens: Canon EF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM
Aperture: f/4.5
Focal Length: 28 mm
ISO Speed: 1600
Flash Used: Yes (off camera)
PP in LR (RAW)
IMAGE: https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-ffW13wUFhCM/USS_xXIbmhI/AAAAAAAAtHA/zt8_9_MR1i0/s883/IMG_6009.jpg
Exposure: 0.025 sec (1/40)
Lens: Canon EF 50mm F1.4 USM
Aperture: f/1.4
Focal Length: 50 mm
ISO Speed: 3200
Exposure Bias: -0.33 EV
Flash Used: No
PP in LR (RAW)

Peewee
Canon 6D, EF 50mm f1.4, EF 24-70mm f2.8 II, EF 24-105mm f4, EF 70-200mm f2.8, Olympus Zuiko 24 mm F/2.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Winston1
Member
37 posts
Joined Feb 2013
     
Feb 20, 2013 22:44 |  #1595

So many great pictures!
I'm getting very impatient waiting for my current gear to sell. I just want my 6D now!

Off topic. I am trying to decide between two lenses for when I get my 6d. First option is 24-105 kit lens, and second one is the new 24-70 tamron. Seems like a really good lens, but I just cant decide on the trade off - focal length for the extra stop?


http://www.flickr.com/​photos/62522386@N00 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ifi
Member
173 posts
Joined Jun 2010
Location: Texas
     
Feb 20, 2013 22:50 |  #1596

Winston1 wrote in post #15634379 (external link)
So many great pictures!
I'm getting very impatient waiting for my current gear to sell. I just want my 6D now!

Off topic. I am trying to decide between two lenses for when I get my 6d. First option is 24-105 kit lens, and second one is the new 24-70 tamron. Seems like a really good lens, but I just cant decide on the trade off - focal length for the extra stop?

What type of photography?

For general all around usage I will get 24-105, actually thats what I have :)


:)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
goodyear
Member
37 posts
Joined Feb 2013
     
Feb 21, 2013 00:01 |  #1597

Tv: 1/50
Av: ƒ/4
ISO: 8000
FL: 24-105 L @ 105 mm
PP: B&W + Crop + Clarity increase

IMAGE: http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8226/8465221063_7bbfc65f17_b.jpg

Canon EOS 6D ~ 24-105mm F4 L ~ 85mm F1.8 USM

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Winston1
Member
37 posts
Joined Feb 2013
     
Feb 21, 2013 09:25 |  #1598

ifi wrote in post #15634394 (external link)
What type of photography?

For general all around usage I will get 24-105, actually thats what I have :)

All sorts - That's the problem.
I find I take a lot of candid indoor shots currently on my 50D where I have to push my iso up to 3200. Even then I struggle with blur.
One of the reasons why I'm so keen to get the 6d is because I should be able to go higher in iso relatively easily, but of course it's always best to keep iso as low as possible.
I also like lenses with a decent amount of bokeh (2.8 etc).

On the downside, when I go travelling, I fear 70mm wont be long enough.
I also suspect the 'L' lens will hold it's value much better than the tamron, which is also a consideration.

I guess I could just get the kit lens and invest the extra money in a fast prime for indoor stuff?

I hate money decisions!
Cant wait to get a 6D though. ;-D


http://www.flickr.com/​photos/62522386@N00 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
amyandmark3
Goldmember
Avatar
2,157 posts
Gallery: 242 photos
Likes: 3931
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Rocklin, CA
     
Feb 21, 2013 09:59 |  #1599

Winston, I have paired the 24-105 for all around usage with the 40 2.8 "pancake" for indoor low light stuff. The 40 is of very nice quality and super cheap, only $149 new with the rebates right now.


Mark O.
Gear List & Gallery

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
VicSkimmr
Senior Member
551 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Oct 2008
Location: Myrtle Beach, SC
     
Feb 21, 2013 10:28 |  #1600

yay flowers

IMAGE: http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8233/8492722869_2a5ca954f4_b.jpg

-Jason
[URL="http://www.flick​r.com/photos/jasonwith​ers/"]flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Erigion
Mostly Lurking
19 posts
Joined May 2008
     
Feb 21, 2013 17:34 |  #1601

VicSkimmr wrote in post #15627526 (external link)
I've noticed that my 24-105 is giving me a pretty heavy vignette on every picture I take with it. Is that normal or is lightroom messing up when I import the pictures somehow? The shots above were obviously not taken with that lens (Sigma 150 macro).

It's normal. the 24-105 has pretty heavy vignetting on FF. Lightroom does have lens correction data for that lens which easily removes the vignetting.


A Camera. A Lens.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
hyogen
Goldmember
Avatar
2,043 posts
Likes: 115
Joined May 2012
Location: Portland, OR
     
Feb 21, 2013 20:10 |  #1602

amyandmark3 wrote in post #15632351 (external link)
Here's a few more from my goose/duck day:

QUOTED IMAGE

these are lovely :D


justinleeportland (external link)
facebook (external link)
500px (external link)
flickr (external link)
EOS R6, 45mm TS-E / RF 35mm 1.8 / RF 28-70 2.0 / EF 16-35 2.8 ii / EF 70-200 2.8 ii / Zhiyun Weebill S / Moza Slypod

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dnauer
Senior Member
Avatar
529 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 47
Joined Nov 2009
Location: Colorado
     
Feb 21, 2013 20:23 |  #1603

Erigion wrote in post #15637406 (external link)
It's normal. the 24-105 has pretty heavy vignetting on FF. Lightroom does have lens correction data for that lens which easily removes the vignetting.

If shooting in JPEG the 6D has in camera correction data too (it requires a lens that has the correction data in the camera, the 24-105 should be there). Not sure how effective that correction is.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
amyandmark3
Goldmember
Avatar
2,157 posts
Gallery: 242 photos
Likes: 3931
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Rocklin, CA
     
Feb 21, 2013 20:46 |  #1604

hyogen wrote in post #15637901 (external link)
these are lovely :D

Thank you. :)


Mark O.
Gear List & Gallery

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Markd102
Senior Member
Avatar
649 posts
Gallery: 26 photos
Likes: 89
Joined May 2011
Location: S/E Victoria, Aus
     
Feb 21, 2013 20:49 |  #1605

dnauer wrote in post #15637954 (external link)
If shooting in JPEG the 6D has in camera correction data too (it requires a lens that has the correction data in the camera, the 24-105 should be there). Not sure how effective that correction is.

The 6D corrects the 24-105 really well. I haven't noticed any vignetting whatsoever.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

2,938,420 views & 3 likes for this thread
-= 6D Owners Unite! Discuss and post Photos!
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EOS Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Rower2021
842 guests, 267 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.