Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 01 Dec 2012 (Saturday) 12:30
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Best Primes for Crop Body - Portrait/Wedding Work

 
Sovern
Senior Member
345 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2012
     
Dec 01, 2012 12:30 |  #1
bannedPermanent ban

I just put my Tamron 17-50 on ebay because to be honest I'm not impressed with zooms despite what people may say.

I thought that 17-50 would be a big deal coming from a straight 50 1.8 prime but it isn't.....take a few steps back and you have 35mm effective, few more back 20mm effectve, few steps forward back to 50mm.

Plus I find myself almost always using the 50mm end for what I shoot.....I don't like the look of 17mm on these zoom lenses.

I guess that I'm more of a telephoto shooter since I primarily shoot portraits and I love the compression that long lenses give but I also like to have the ability to go a little wide for environmental portraits whether it be indoor or outdoor/

Plus you can't beat the bokeh and low light ability of a good prime as I shoot primary portraiture and in the future weddings. I hope that I can get at least $350 for this Tamron and start to build up a set of primes.

Plus there was just something lacking contrast and sharpness wise coming from a 50mm prime.....I'm sure that if I get a prime that is better than the cheap thrifty fifty that has Full USM I'll be more than pleased with that.

What do you guys think a good prime set up would be for crop body (I'll be going FF eventually)? Maybe something like 30 1.4 or 28 1.8, 85 1.8, and a wide angle prime?

Thanks and all the best.


Canon 450D
Tamron 17-50 2.8 non vc
Yungnuo 560 II Speedlite

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
manfesto
Senior Member
303 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2011
     
Dec 01, 2012 12:47 |  #2

My two-lens walk around kit was the 28mm f/1.8 and 85mm f/1.8 for a long time.

I love the 85mm f/1.8 on crop. It frames like a 135mm on full frame, you need some working distance from your subject, but it's wonderful for portraiture. I'd start there.

The 28mm f/1.8 is just a touch wider than normal on crop, which I don't mind but did have to get used to. The lens is not nearly as bad as its detractors make it out to be, but it's best to keep it stopped down to about f/2.2 IMHO. Other than that, great general purpose lens for shooting everything I couldn't shoot with the 85mm.

The 30mm f/1.4 isn't full frame compatible, so if you're planning on keeping your lenses when you go full frame, I'd skip it.

Also, the 28 and 85 become totally different lenses on full frame - the 28mm a true wide-angle and the 85mm a much looser (but still very good) portrait lens.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
hennie
Goldmember
1,265 posts
Gallery: 30 photos
Likes: 104
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Spijkenisse, The Netherlands
     
Dec 01, 2012 12:53 |  #3

What you seem to miss is that in taking a few steps back or front does not only change the size of the frame, but also the proportions of background against foreground.
A portrait taken with a 10mm at 2 feet is quite different from a portrait taken with a 85 mm from 6 feet.
Get yourself a healty mix of primes ( for speed and IQ) and zooms (for convenience).
A good set of primes to start with is 35-85-135 on FF or 24-50-85 on crop.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
drzenitram
Senior Member
824 posts
Joined Aug 2012
     
Dec 01, 2012 12:58 |  #4

Sovern wrote in post #15312545 (external link)
I just put my Tamron 17-50 on ebay because to be honest I'm not impressed with zooms despite what people may say.

I thought that 17-50 would be a big deal coming from a straight 50 1.8 prime but it isn't.....take a few steps back and you have 35mm effective, few more back 20mm effectve, few steps forward back to 50mm.

Plus I find myself almost always using the 50mm end for what I shoot.....I don't like the look of 17mm on these zoom lenses.

I guess that I'm more of a telephoto shooter since I primarily shoot portraits and I love the compression that long lenses give but I also like to have the ability to go a little wide for environmental portraits whether it be indoor or outdoor/

Plus you can't beat the bokeh and low light ability of a good prime as I shoot primary portraiture and in the future weddings. I hope that I can get at least $350 for this Tamron and start to build up a set of primes.

Plus there was just something lacking contrast and sharpness wise coming from a 50mm prime.....I'm sure that if I get a prime that is better than the cheap thrifty fifty that has Full USM I'll be more than pleased with that.

What do you guys think a good prime set up would be for crop body (I'll be going FF eventually)? Maybe something like 30 1.4 or 28 1.8, 85 1.8, and a wide angle prime?

Thanks and all the best.

It's surprising how good the nifty fifty really is. It's definitely a good lens optics-wise. On crop, there are about 3 different budget levels for your primes.

Low budget: 35 f2, 50 1.8, 85 1.8
Medium budget: Sigma 35, (sigma or canon) 50 1.4, Sigma 85
High budget: Sigma 35, 50L, 85L

For portraits, these will be great. For weddings, you'll want to make some other investments first, like making sure you have two camera bodies that can handle ISO 1600-3200 with manageable noise. In my opinion, the 450d can't do that. The 550d can(same sensor as 7D), though, and it can be had for a few hundred dollars. Shooting primes for events, you'll want to have two bodies with one prime on each(since you can't zoom and situations may arise where you don't have time or space to move around or switch lenses).

35mm isn't very wide on crop, but when it comes to wider primes there aren't a lot of good options, at least none that aren't very very expensive. The rokinon 14mm is great and fairly wide on crop, but doesn't have the same dramatic perspective that it does on full frame. For wide angles you'll probably want to grab a 10-22 or a tokina 11-16. Personally, I didn't miss a wide angle on crop. On full frame, it's much easier to get those wide angles.

However, for portraits, crop just can't beat full frame. Since the price of 5D classics are coming down so much, if I were you I'd just pick up a 5d classic for $600-650, grab a 35 f2 and an 85 1.8 and you'll have an excellent portrait kit for $1100 or less that can shoot ISO 1600 all day long. The full frame difference is immense when it comes to shallow depth of field. An 85 1.8 is a good portrait lens on crop, it's a fantastic portrait lens on FF. Eventually you'd probably want something a little longer so you may look into a 135L or 200L, but the quality of the 70-200 zooms today aren't to be overlooked. Try them before you knock them. Canon's 70-200 2.8 II is king, but the Sigma 70-200 OS is also incredible and much cheaper. Tamron's new 70-200 VC offering should also be a contender. Image stabilization is invaluable for portraits(since you only need 1/60-1/120 shutter speed to capture portraits ).

In summary:
1. A 35, 50, 85 combo is great on crop(equivalent to a 50, 85, 135 combo on FF). You'll be lacking on the wide side, but there aren't any inexpensive primes that are better than a 10-22 on crop.

2. For weddings/events you'll want to have 2 bodies, especially since you're shooting with primes(but otherwise for backup in case the first fails).

3. For your purposes(portraits and events), full frame is definitely king. 5D Classic and 5d Mark II prices are coming down rapidly, making full frame very affordable.


| Bodies - 5D Mark II, T2i | Lenses - Helios 44-2, Sigma 35mm 1.4, Sigma 85 1.4, Sigma 70-200 2.8 OS, Tamron SP AF 1.4x TC | Lights - 430ex ii x2, Random 3rd party strobes

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sovern
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
345 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2012
     
Dec 01, 2012 13:25 |  #5
bannedPermanent ban

hennie wrote in post #15312616 (external link)
What you seem to miss is that in taking a few steps back or front does not only change the size of the frame, but also the proportions of background against foreground.
A portrait taken with a 10mm at 2 feet is quite different from a portrait taken with a 85 mm from 6 feet.
Get yourself a healty mix of primes ( for speed and IQ) and zooms (for convenience).
A good set of primes to start with is 35-85-135 on FF or 24-50-85 on crop.

I already understand this, this is called perspective distortion as there is wide angle perspective distortion and compression distortion.

The thing is that the perspective distortion between say 28-50mm does not change much at all...it;s not drastic. This is why I don;t see the point in my 17-50 zoom, It's really only useful for me at the widest end if I need to go really wide for an indoor shot or a 50mm for portraits.

The difference between 35mm and 50mm perspective wide is minimal and is only a few steps forwards or backwards while the difference from 28mm to 85mm is quite good and worth the change in lens on the camera body.

Thanks for the advice guys I'm going to sell my 450D and my Tamron 17-50 and just buy a Full Frame 5D Classic a long with a thrifty fifty for the time being.

I'd rather shoot portraiture and weddings with a full frame as that's the ideal choice and that's what I'm going to go with.


Canon 450D
Tamron 17-50 2.8 non vc
Yungnuo 560 II Speedlite

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lexar
Senior Member
298 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Aug 2012
     
Dec 01, 2012 15:52 |  #6

I went for the Sigma 30 f1.4, Canon 50 f.1.8, and Canon 100 f2.0

I think that if you go for 35 its too close to 50 and if you go to 85 its too close to 50 so its better to spread it.
BTW I tried a Canon 28 and definitely for the price I would go for the Sigma 30!!


Canon R7 | RF 18-150 | RF 100-400 | Canon 70D | 15-85IS | Σ17-50/2.8 | Σ30/1.4 | 40/2.8 Pancake | 100/2.0 | 55-250STM | 430EXII

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
npompei
Senior Member
563 posts
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Warrington, PA
     
Dec 01, 2012 17:13 |  #7

Sigma 30mm
Canon 85mm 1.8

The Sigma 30mm is great for indoor portrait /wedding work. Good cheap lens.

In use the 85 a ton for indoor church work where I need 1.8. It has its flaws but for the $ its killer. I think that's a great combo.


www.nickpompei.com (external link)
Flickr (external link)
Canon 5d3-gripped / Canon 5d / Canon EOS M / Phottix Mitros + (3) / Tamron 17-35 (2.8-4.0) / Tamron 28-75 (2.8) / Canon 35L / Canon 50 (1.4) / Sigma 85 (1.4) / Canon 70-200(2.8)IS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sovern
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
345 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2012
     
Dec 01, 2012 17:39 |  #8
bannedPermanent ban

85 1.8 on crop I have heard nothing but good things about especially for indoor wedding/portrait work. That will definitly be my next lens, I must have camera ADHD as I decided that I'm keeping my Tamron as I tested it out earlier and it still focuses tack sharp even in the dimmest of lighting conditions and it will be too expensive for me to get a full frame or even sell my Tamron and get all primes. I still love primes though so I'll end up getting the 85 1.8 and after getting a second 450D body a 135 2.0L or 200 f2.8L possibly.


Canon 450D
Tamron 17-50 2.8 non vc
Yungnuo 560 II Speedlite

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
raksphoto
Senior Member
527 posts
Gallery: 21 photos
Likes: 111
Joined Jun 2010
Location: California
     
Dec 02, 2012 05:22 |  #9

If it were 2 prime lenses, for a 1.6x FoC CF camera, I would pick 35mm f/1.4L, and 100mm f/2.

The 35mm gets you a person-sized, or couple-sized foto from modest working distance, without distortion. Then the 100mm gets you tight shots of faces, holding hands, etc. I recommend these 2 primes (not merely focal lengths) for very good AF speed in low-light. The 35mm f/2, in my experience, hunts around a lot in low-light, hard to get the shot. Whereas the 100mm f/2 does very well with AF, under these conditons.

Then with this setup, you could toss in the nifty fifty, for in-between coverage in low-light, at very modest cost, clearly. It is sharp, and can work well with care, but it just doesn't have the creamy tonality that the 35mm f/1.2L would.

Variations on this setup could be 24mm or 28mm for wider shots, 85mm for portraits. I have found those focal lengths too wide and not tight enough, respectively. Both tend to force closer working distances than I would prefer, so as to not distort the relative size of noses, arms, etc. 24/28mm used for group fotos, and 85mm for tele candids are potential good uses of these focal lengths in a wedding context. Though the 100mm f/2 could double for candids-at-a-distance.

So, a 2-body, 3-prime to 2-body, 5-prime system emerges. With a Black Rapid R2 camera harness and 3 outboard hip-belt lens pouches (or similar, for the 5-prime case), a very portable, low-weight, carryable all-prime system emerges for day-long gigs like a wedding.


2x 7D Mark II | 70D | 5DSr
EF-S 10-18mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM | EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM |
EF-S 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS II USM | EF 70-200mm f/4L |
EF 135mm f/2L | EF 100mm f/2 | EF 85mm f/1.8 | EF 50mm f/1.2L | EF 35mm f/1.4L EF 100mm f/2.8L IS USM MACRO

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,430 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
Best Primes for Crop Body - Portrait/Wedding Work
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2462 guests, 92 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.