Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 03 Dec 2012 (Monday) 10:37
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5D Mark III Electronic Level Problem

 
Mark ­ Booth
Senior Member
Avatar
393 posts
Likes: 22
Joined Jun 2003
     
Dec 03, 2012 10:37 |  #1

Has anyone else had a problem with a hopelessly inaccurate Electronic Level in their 5D Mark III camera?

This is what I get when I level the camera with my eyeball (through the viewfinder) and then confirm that it's level with the bubble level on my RRS BH-55 ballhead (Canon 100mm prime is the lens):

IMAGE: http://www.thephotobooth.net/photos/i-Cfwwvfp/0/XL/i-Cfwwvfp-XL.jpg


This is what I get when I level the camera using the 5D Mark III's built-in Electronic Level feature:

IMAGE: http://www.thephotobooth.net/photos/i-FwDQjxS/0/XL/i-FwDQjxS-XL.jpg


To prove I'm not exaggerating, here's a shot of the back of the 5D Mark III with the Electronic Level displayed. Check out the bubble level on the ballhead clamp!

IMAGE: http://www.thephotobooth.net/photos/i-ZxJmGGC/0/XL/i-ZxJmGGC-XL.jpg


I looked at the user manual and don't see anything about calibrating the electronic level. Is there some service menu where I can fix it?

Mark

"If a day goes by without my doing something related to photography, it's as though I've neglected something essential to my existence, as though I had forgotten to wake up."
-- Richard Avedon

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
"spouting off stupid things"
Avatar
57,724 posts
Likes: 4057
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
Dec 03, 2012 10:47 |  #2

Send it back to Canon for repair and adjustment. THough it sounds like you have just come up with a new feature.

Canon, if your listening, WE WANT ELECTRONIC LEVEL MICRO ADJUSTMENT!! (ELMA) :):)


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scatterbrained
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,511 posts
Gallery: 267 photos
Best ofs: 12
Likes: 4607
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Yomitan, Okinawa, Japan
     
Dec 03, 2012 10:49 |  #3

You do know that's not a level right? It's the "angled composition app". ;)


VanillaImaging.com (external link)"Vacuous images for the Vapid consumer"
500px (external link)
flickr (external link)
1x (external link)
instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
EL_PIC
Goldmember
Avatar
2,028 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Austin Texas - Lucca Italy
     
Dec 03, 2012 10:51 |  #4
bannedPermanent ban

Send it back if you think it should be fixed.
To me ... level adjustment is an edit feature {PS}.


EL_PIC - RIT BS Photo '78 - Photomask Engineering Mgr
Canon DSLR - Nikon SLR - Phase One 60MP MFDSLR
http://www.Photo-Image-Creations.com (external link)
http://www.musecube.co​m/el_pic/ (external link)
http://www.facebook.co​m/PhotoImageCreations (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
"spouting off stupid things"
Avatar
57,724 posts
Likes: 4057
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
Dec 03, 2012 10:55 |  #5

Scatterbrained wrote in post #15320297 (external link)
You do know that's not a level right? It's the "angled composition app". ;)

ACA.. na, need a better acronym.


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mark ­ Kemp
Goldmember
1,064 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2003
     
Dec 03, 2012 10:58 |  #6

Are you sure your house is not leaning over?

But seriously mine is fine.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mark ­ Booth
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
393 posts
Likes: 22
Joined Jun 2003
     
Dec 03, 2012 11:09 |  #7

It is rare that I would use the Electronic Level. HOWEVER, when the day comes that I would want to sell the 5D Mark III, you can be ABSOLUTELY CERTAIN that this grossly inaccurate Electronic Level will become a sticking point for someone that buys the camera. They'll want to return it or make me pay to have it fixed by Canon.

It makes far more sense to get it fixed now, while the camera only has 86 shutter actuation on it.

Now, to decide if I should contact B&H about getting an exchange replacement, or to sent it to Canon for repair. Either way, a PAIN IN THE BUTT for something that cost over $3,000!

Mark


"If a day goes by without my doing something related to photography, it's as though I've neglected something essential to my existence, as though I had forgotten to wake up."
-- Richard Avedon

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scatterbrained
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,511 posts
Gallery: 267 photos
Best ofs: 12
Likes: 4607
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Yomitan, Okinawa, Japan
     
Dec 03, 2012 11:10 |  #8

On a more serious note, how crooked was the camera when you activated the level? I remember some people having issues with the 7D level being less accurate the more crooked the camera was when the level was turned on. Basically, if the camera was pretty close to begin with the level would be more accurate. I think that was even discussed in one of the Canon DLC videos.


VanillaImaging.com (external link)"Vacuous images for the Vapid consumer"
500px (external link)
flickr (external link)
1x (external link)
instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
djames
Member
219 posts
Joined Jul 2010
     
Dec 03, 2012 11:12 |  #9

Mine seems fine. You're right, get it fixed/replaced now, as you say it could so easily become a sticking point later on.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mark ­ Booth
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
393 posts
Likes: 22
Joined Jun 2003
     
Dec 03, 2012 11:27 |  #10

Just talked with a nice gentleman at CPS (Canon Professional Services). He explained that the acceptable margin of error on the built-in Electronic Level is +/- 6 degrees on the horizontal and +/- 4 degrees on the vertical. I pointed him to this topic and he looked at the photos. He said he can't tell from the photo whether or not the tilt is within the margin of acceptable error.

It was hard to keep from laughing. Not laughing at him, but laughing at the ridiculousness of Canon feeling a 6ยบ margin of error is acceptable. WHY BOTHER TO INCLUDE THE FEATURE AT ALL if it is allowed to be that grossly inaccurate.

The rep told me the whole point of the Electronic Level is to "get close". Ha! I can get closer than that with both eyes closed and using just my hands to feel if things are level.

Next phone call, B&H.

Mark


"If a day goes by without my doing something related to photography, it's as though I've neglected something essential to my existence, as though I had forgotten to wake up."
-- Richard Avedon

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mark ­ Booth
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
393 posts
Likes: 22
Joined Jun 2003
     
Dec 03, 2012 11:29 |  #11

Scatterbrained wrote in post #15320364 (external link)
On a more serious note, how crooked was the camera when you activated the level? I remember some people having issues with the 7D level being less accurate the more crooked the camera was when the level was turned on. Basically, if the camera was pretty close to begin with the level would be more accurate. I think that was even discussed in one of the Canon DLC videos.

The camera was in the ballhead clamp and leveled by my eye and ballhead bubble level before I accessed the Electronic Level. Then I adjusted the ballhead to level the Electronic Level.

Mark


"If a day goes by without my doing something related to photography, it's as though I've neglected something essential to my existence, as though I had forgotten to wake up."
-- Richard Avedon

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mark ­ Booth
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
393 posts
Likes: 22
Joined Jun 2003
     
Dec 03, 2012 11:53 |  #12

B&H is shipping me a replacement 5D Mark III via overnight shipping. I will return the "crooked" 5D Mark III in the same shipping box via the pre-paid return label B&H is providing. MUCH faster turnaround than sending the camera to Canon for repair.

Fingers crossed that the new camera doesn't have a wacky Electronic Level AND that there aren't any other issues with the new camera. My confidence in Canon has been shaken a bit.

Mark


"If a day goes by without my doing something related to photography, it's as though I've neglected something essential to my existence, as though I had forgotten to wake up."
-- Richard Avedon

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LV ­ Moose
Moose gets blamed for everything.
Avatar
23,434 posts
Gallery: 223 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 4798
Joined Dec 2008
     
Dec 03, 2012 11:59 |  #13

Mark Booth wrote in post #15320430 (external link)
He explained that the acceptable margin of error on the built-in Electronic Level is +/- 6 degrees on the horizontal

Wow. That's rediculous. :confused:


Moose

Gear... Flickr (external link)...Flickr 2 (external link)...
Macro (external link)...Hummingbirds (external link)
Aircraft (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
djames
Member
219 posts
Joined Jul 2010
     
Dec 03, 2012 12:03 |  #14

Mark Booth wrote in post #15320543 (external link)
B&H is shipping me a replacement 5D Mark III via overnight shipping. I will return the "crooked" 5D Mark III in the same shipping box via the pre-paid return label B&H is providing. MUCH faster turnaround than sending the camera to Canon for repair.

Fingers crossed that the new camera doesn't have a wacky Electronic Level AND that there aren't any other issues with the new camera. My confidence in Canon has been shaken a bit.

Mark

Hopefully things work out with the new one. That is a high tolerance level and a disappointing approach by Canon.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
2n10
Cream of the Crop
17,097 posts
Gallery: 81 photos
Likes: 1222
Joined Sep 2012
Location: Sparks, Nevada, USA
     
Dec 03, 2012 12:32 |  #15

I have a vertical discrepancy on my 7D that is close to their specs I think, horizontal appears to be very close. I am quite horizontally challenged with the camera so at least the level works where my need is greatest. I also have a level to double check against that I intend to use when the need arises.

Those specs could lead to a very twisted shot if the level is at the extremes.


John
Equipment
My Portfolio (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

8,987 views & 0 likes for this thread, 15 members have posted to it.
5D Mark III Electronic Level Problem
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is zachary24
1396 guests, 122 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.