http://www.adorama.com …ther&utm_source=cj_552179![]()
May pick this up so I can use on my 5dm2 and 7D and sell the 17-55.
Dec 05, 2012 11:16 | #1 http://www.adorama.com …ther&utm_source=cj_552179 Canon 5Dm3, Fuji X100T, Fuji X-T1, Fuji X70
LOG IN TO REPLY |
vaflower Senior Member 855 posts Joined Sep 2012 Location: Massachusetts More info | Dec 05, 2012 11:28 | #2 Great price. May pick one up waiting for Canon 24-70 ii price coming down. Fuji XE-1, Zeiss ikon, Hasselblad; I love shooting film as a conceptual idea
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Artdime Senior Member 273 posts Joined Jan 2006 Location: DFW More info | I am tempted as well. Reviews seem to be all over the place though. Wonder how this compares optically to for example the 24-105 - apart from the stop difference - or the new Tamron 24-70 VC. - Florian
LOG IN TO REPLY |
vaflower Senior Member 855 posts Joined Sep 2012 Location: Massachusetts More info | Dec 05, 2012 12:17 | #4 Seriously, how did you find the link? I went to the adorama home page and searched for this sigma but the special 699 price is nowhere to be found. The price there is the regular 824. Fuji XE-1, Zeiss ikon, Hasselblad; I love shooting film as a conceptual idea
LOG IN TO REPLY |
EnigmaDXTR Member 53 posts Likes: 2 Joined Dec 2011 Location: NYC More info | Dec 05, 2012 12:26 | #5 http://www.adorama.com …028HEOS....urce=cj_552179 vaflower wrote in post #15329689 Seriously, how did you find the link? I went to the adorama home page and searched for this sigma but the special 699 price is nowhere to be found. The price there is the regular 824. Sony A7rll / Batis 85 F1.8 / FE 55 F1.8 / FE 28 F2
LOG IN TO REPLY |
pdrober2 Goldmember 2,318 posts Joined Nov 2010 Location: Durham, NC More info | Dec 05, 2012 12:53 | #6 i'm not seeing it for $699 either Fujifilm X-T1 | 23 | 27 | 56 | 90 | 55-200
LOG IN TO REPLY |
rclphoto Member 161 posts Joined Mar 2010 Location: Chicago, IL More info | Dec 05, 2012 13:10 | #7 You can't find it through a regular link.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JakAHearts Cream of the Crop More info | Dec 05, 2012 13:12 | #8 This lens is amazing. I liked it on my 5DII but it is RIDICULOUS on my 5DIII. It focuses fast enough to keep up with my toddler running this way and that and very very very rarely misses, even in iso3200 1/160th F2.8 light. Its very very sharp at 2.8. I can obviously only compare it at 70mm, but its pretty much negligible in comparison to my 70-200L ISII in the center. The corners are noticeably softer than my sigma 50 1.4 and 70-200 however. Overall, for the price, its an amazing piece of glass. Shane
LOG IN TO REPLY |
starkyrulz Senior Member 561 posts Joined Oct 2011 Location: Calcutta, India More info | Dec 05, 2012 13:29 | #9 page not found | 5D Mark III | T3i | 24-70 f2.8 MK II L | 70-200 f2.8 IS mk II L | 18-200 f3.5-5.6 | Σ 30mm f1.4 | 50 f1.8 | 430exII | YongnouYN560 | YongnouRF603 | Vangaurd 263AT |
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Bokehlicious Senior Member 809 posts Joined Jan 2011 More info | Dec 05, 2012 14:09 | #11 the sale had been going on since yesterday
LOG IN TO REPLY |
L.J.G. "Not brigth enough" More info | Dec 05, 2012 14:33 | #12 Artdime wrote in post #15329571 I am tempted as well. Reviews seem to be all over the place though. Wonder how this compares optically to for example the 24-105 - apart from the stop difference It compares quite favourably, in fact at f/5.6 or above images are sharper and clearer than my 24-105 sooc. It is like most large aperture lenses, a bit soft at f/2.8 but still quite useable. Mine has had no focus issues and did not require any MFA. Lloyd
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JakAHearts Cream of the Crop More info | Dec 05, 2012 15:20 | #13 L.J.G. wrote in post #15330194 It compares quite favourably, in fact at f/5.6 or above images are sharper and clearer than my 24-105 sooc. It is like most large aperture lenses, a bit soft at f/2.8 but still quite useable. Mine has had no focus issues and did not require any MFA. Its funny you say this. On my 5DII, I thought this lens was ok at 2.8. On the 5DIII, I find it incredible. Im not sure why it would be different, but its quite a difference. Shane
LOG IN TO REPLY |
vaflower Senior Member 855 posts Joined Sep 2012 Location: Massachusetts More info | Dec 05, 2012 15:31 | #14 JakAHearts wrote in post #15330403 Its funny you say this. On my 5DII, I thought this lens was ok at 2.8. On the 5DIII, I find it incredible. Im not sure why it would be different, but its quite a difference. Since the glass is the same, So you are saying the 5diii focusing much more accurate than the 5dmkii ? Fuji XE-1, Zeiss ikon, Hasselblad; I love shooting film as a conceptual idea
LOG IN TO REPLY |
L.J.G. "Not brigth enough" More info | Dec 05, 2012 15:43 | #15 JakAHearts wrote in post #15330403 Its funny you say this. On my 5DII, I thought this lens was ok at 2.8. On the 5DIII, I find it incredible. Im not sure why it would be different, but its quite a difference. Funny you should say that haha. I have heard a lot of people say that their lenses just seem to "come alive" when jumping from the 5D2 to the 5D3. I have resisted going to the mark 3 because I love my mark 2, but as time goes by I think about upgrading more and more for the reason you mention, plus better high ISO performance. Lloyd
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Monkeytoes 1331 guests, 169 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||