Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 03 Jan 2006 (Tuesday) 17:47
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Lighting and Focusing.....

 
AXENA
Senior Member
Avatar
412 posts
Joined Dec 2003
Location: Toms River, NJ
     
Jan 03, 2006 17:47 |  #1

I need to know the answer to this, seriously.... as I was unaware of the following....

From another thread.....
flourescent can cuase back focusing, and incadscent can cause front focusing.


IS THIS TRUE???? I learn something every day.... does this really happen... if so... that would explain some of my 24-70 issues..... can someone confirm this?

I do not mean this sarcastically either..... I really am unaware if this can cause focusing issues..... because if this is the case, there is probably nothing wrong with my copy of my 24-70L as the testing I did was under incadescents.....brigh​t ones, but incadescent none-the-less......


Gary S. Latimer - C&C always accepted/appreciated!
ShoreShot Photography, LLC (Formerly Axena Productions)
www.shoreshotphoto.com (external link)
Gear-Bag: 30D's, 20D's, 18-55EFs, 17-40f/4L, 70-200f/2.8L, 100-400f/5.6L, 50f/1.4, 85f/1.8, 24-70f/2.8 EX DG, 580EX II, 580 EX, 430EX's, Alien Bees, and a trusty G5!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AXENA
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
412 posts
Joined Dec 2003
Location: Toms River, NJ
     
Jan 03, 2006 19:16 |  #2

No takers yet?


Gary S. Latimer - C&C always accepted/appreciated!
ShoreShot Photography, LLC (Formerly Axena Productions)
www.shoreshotphoto.com (external link)
Gear-Bag: 30D's, 20D's, 18-55EFs, 17-40f/4L, 70-200f/2.8L, 100-400f/5.6L, 50f/1.4, 85f/1.8, 24-70f/2.8 EX DG, 580EX II, 580 EX, 430EX's, Alien Bees, and a trusty G5!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tsmith
Formerly known as Bluedog_XT
Avatar
10,429 posts
Likes: 26
Joined Jul 2005
Location: South_the 601
     
Jan 03, 2006 19:58 |  #3

I really don't see how but I've been wrong before.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nightcrawler
Senior Member
Avatar
685 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2004
Location: Omaha, NE
     
Jan 03, 2006 23:06 |  #4

I haven't heard of that before. I don't know how flourescent could affect the AF sensors different than incandescent.



Jason - Gear - Site (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
malla1962
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,714 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jul 2004
Location: Walney Island,cumbria,uk
     
Jan 04, 2006 02:51 as a reply to  @ Nightcrawler's post |  #5

Its a new one on me,where did you read that?:D


Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Orgnoi1
Member
Avatar
211 posts
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Upstate NY
     
Jan 04, 2006 06:05 |  #6

I am not going to say that I agree or disagree with the initial statement... because honestly I dont know... but obviously it boils down to the amount of light and the ability to focus on the subject... where as increasing the light will diminish either (or both) back or forward focusing....


TRJ Photography - Canon CPS Member
Berkshire Scenic Railway Museum Staff Photographer
Visable and IR Photography / Canon , Mamiya , Toyo
Are you a photographer in the Northeastern USA? Come visit us! (Click Here) (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lester ­ Wareham
Moderator
Avatar
33,001 posts
Gallery: 3035 photos
Best ofs: 5
Likes: 47046
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Hampshire, UK
     
Jan 04, 2006 06:36 |  #7

Well the dominant light wavelength will be different under different lighting. However I can only see this affecting focus if the lens or AF system has significant cromatic aberation. It would be a very poor lens to do this. The AF sub-system might have small lenses on the sensors that introduce CA, sounds a bit unlikely though.


Gear List
FAQ on UV and Clear Protective Filters
Macrophotography by LordV
flickr (external link) Flickr Home (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jon
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
69,628 posts
Likes: 227
Joined Jun 2004
Location: Bethesda, MD USA
     
Jan 04, 2006 12:10 |  #8

If there were any basis for this happening, Canon and other camera makers would use AWB readings to apply a known offset to the focussing signals based on the light temp.

This may have risen as a result of someone trying to focus on targets that provide better contrast in one light than another, or if the AF readings in the system were taken in sync with the frequency of AC powering the fluorescents, but if there were anything to this the greatest difference would be between focussing in open shade and in candlelight or firelight, where there's the greatest possible difference in principal wavelengths. And even in those two extreme conditions, there's still plenty of light from the rest of the spectrum present.


Jon
----------
Cocker Spaniels
Maryland and Virginia activities
Image Posting Rules and Image Posting FAQ
Report SPAM, Don't Answer It! (link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.
PAYPAL GIFT NO LONGER ALLOWED HERE

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AXENA
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
412 posts
Joined Dec 2003
Location: Toms River, NJ
     
Jan 04, 2006 12:31 |  #9

OK.... good.... at least this is an unknown to more experienced photogs.... thanks. As for natural light.... the 24-70 performed very well... although not as tack sharp as a prime... but I now understand that this is inherent in the zoom build, and not a focus issue. So the results are still mixed.... on my 24-70, it performs well in daylight conditions, on one-shot AF, and not so well with indoor lighting... appeared to front-focus about 6 cm on the open ends, but corrected itself at f 4 and higher.

Thanks again for the input.


Gary S. Latimer - C&C always accepted/appreciated!
ShoreShot Photography, LLC (Formerly Axena Productions)
www.shoreshotphoto.com (external link)
Gear-Bag: 30D's, 20D's, 18-55EFs, 17-40f/4L, 70-200f/2.8L, 100-400f/5.6L, 50f/1.4, 85f/1.8, 24-70f/2.8 EX DG, 580EX II, 580 EX, 430EX's, Alien Bees, and a trusty G5!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

973 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
Lighting and Focusing.....
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is icebergchick
1377 guests, 155 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.