Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
Thread started 14 Dec 2012 (Friday) 04:09
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

aerial photography

 
Shoayb ­ Hesham
Member
121 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2010
     
Dec 14, 2012 04:09 |  #1

hello everyone

there are some ideas in my mind for overhead shots, many times i need to do such project but i dont have the right equipments for that , i was thinking of 2 solutions :

the first one which is camera crane , mainly used for videos but i want to use it to take overhead photos

the second idea i was thinking of is to have a remote control heli with camera mounted beneath it

does anyone experienced any of these ? is there any better solution ?

thanks


MY WEBSITE (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Luckless
Goldmember
3,064 posts
Likes: 189
Joined Mar 2012
Location: PEI, Canada
     
Dec 14, 2012 08:32 |  #2

The problem with a small RC VTOL craft is going to be vibrations, weight limits, and accurate flying to get the shot you're looking for. Small, safe, and affordable units are going to lack the payload capacity to carry much of anything gear wise, and a steady platform for a sizeable DSLR and the gear to hold it steady for reliable shots is going to be large, powerful, and rather dangerous to have fall on someone's head.

Smaller lighter units can do the job, but you may find yourself doing a lot of retakes due to errors.

Depending on exactly what kind of shots and conditions you are working in, a tethered balloon may also be an option.


Canon EOS 7D | EF 28 f/1.8 | EF 85 f/1.8 | EF 70-200 f/4L | EF-S 17-55 | Sigma 150-500
Flickr: Real-Luckless (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
viper522
Member
133 posts
Joined Nov 2011
     
Dec 14, 2012 14:47 |  #3

I second the tethered balloon or kite. Look up Kite Aerial Photography (or KAP).

As an owner of 3 remote control helicopters, I'm thousands of dollars into the hobby and still not satisfied with the results. You would have to spend $2000 just to get started, and you'd better know your way around electronics and RF/EMI troubleshooting.

If you're very curious, here's a link to get you started. You can spend less money, but you'll be doing a lot of the trial-and-error yourself. Not ideal when sending up possibly $4000 in camera gear.

http://www.mikrokopter​.us …axl-navi-radio-camera-kit (external link)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhotosGuy
Cream of the Crop, R.I.P.
Avatar
75,941 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 2610
Joined Feb 2004
Location: Middle of Michigan
     
Dec 15, 2012 09:29 |  #4

"Overhead photos" of what? Some guys use a long pole. MAST PHOTOGRAPHY/GROUND BASED AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY
Some...

Kite Aerial Photography

RC helicopter rig shots in post #17: Have any of you tried aerial photography for extra bucks?


FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
Classic Carz, Racing, Air Show, Flowers.
Find the light... A few Car Lighting Tips, and MOVE YOUR FEET!
Have you thought about making your own book? // Need an exposure crutch?
New Image Size Limits: Image must not exceed 1600 pixels on any side.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
yipDog ­ Studios
Goldmember
Avatar
1,579 posts
Likes: 43
Joined Nov 2012
Location: Mesa, AZ
     
Dec 15, 2012 09:50 |  #5

(As there are people from all over the world on this forum i need to preface this post by saying this applies to the USA only. i dont know the regulations in other countries)

Do not do RC unless you are a very experienced pilot. And even if you are, don't do it for commercial purposes (FAA is still working out the laws on this) and if you still want to do it, make sure its nowhere near buildings, people, vehicles, other aircraft or other things that could get damaged when...not if...you crash. Check with your insurance as most charge a heavy premium for strapping a camera to a plane or heli. If you do it without insurance and damage something or kill someone, your life is going to change. (even with insurance your life will change)
I have flown rc for over 20 years and used to offer video and photo but legally I can't any more. I have been following the legislation very closely as I'd love to get into it again. They consider aerial photo/video to be a UAV that could be used for military purposes.

Balloons, cranes, lifts or hiring a "full scale" pilot and plane are the best bets but check to make sure your insurance covers this. Mine requires a seperate waiver.

I know there are tons of people out there doing this illegally but I'd rather wait til the law is settled than become part of the reason aerial photography and video gets banned altogether. Bottom line is be safe!


www.yipdogstudios.com (external link) http://yipdog.smugmug.​com (external link)
1Dx, 5D mk3, 70D, C100, glass for all occasions, and a studio full of support gear!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BrandonSi
Nevermind.. I'm silly.
Avatar
5,307 posts
Gallery: 62 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 146
Joined Sep 2004
Location: Chicago
     
Dec 15, 2012 09:59 |  #6

I used to do KAP hobby-wise, and it's fun, but kites / accessories get expensive, and you're always limited by the weather.. and I never did get the guts to use my SLR, it was always a P&S with CHDK set up via intervalometer. There are some setups with remote control rotations / panning, etc.. never tried it, but obviously you're still dependent on the weather.

I think the pole / crane idea has more merit and is probably the most cost effective.


[ www (external link)ยท flickr (external link)]

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Brettpp
Member
30 posts
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Melbourne, Australia
     
Jan 04, 2013 21:18 |  #7

You can't beat a cherry picker with an experienced operator on the controls. And your eye in the viewfinder!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Brettpp
Member
30 posts
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Melbourne, Australia
     
Jan 04, 2013 21:20 |  #8

I have been up at 20 meters (in a cherry pucker) and there is some movement, so a tripod is out of the question. Dusk shoots are problematic. I would stick to the daylight hours or early dusk.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,353 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
aerial photography
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Marcsaa
521 guests, 155 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.