I took this as the sun was setting. I feel that this could have been a good photo, but turned out fairly mediocre. C&C welcome and any advice on improving this photo or if you had to reshoot it, how would you go about it.
IMG_9716
Oeijur Member 85 posts Likes: 14 Joined Aug 2012 More info | Dec 14, 2012 05:10 | #1 I took this as the sun was setting. I feel that this could have been a good photo, but turned out fairly mediocre. C&C welcome and any advice on improving this photo or if you had to reshoot it, how would you go about it. IMG_9716
LOG IN TO REPLY |
garydogwood Member 47 posts Joined Oct 2007 More info | Dec 14, 2012 07:09 | #2 timing is everything. maybe 10 - 15 minutes earlier would have given you a bit more sunset light to contrast against the tree. still a nice photo though. gw
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MichaelDellaPolla Mostly Lurking 11 posts Joined Dec 2012 More info | Dec 14, 2012 07:29 | #3 I like that you caught the moon. Michael Della Polla
LOG IN TO REPLY |
EL_PIC Goldmember 2,028 posts Likes: 1 Joined Dec 2009 Location: Austin Texas - Lucca Italy More info | Dec 14, 2012 07:39 | #4 Permanent bangarydogwood wrote in post #15365568 timing is everything. maybe 10 - 15 minutes earlier would have given you a bit more sunset light to contrast against the tree. still a nice photo though. So is Photoshop enhancements and often the better way. Image hosted by forum (628099) © EL_PIC [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. EL_PIC - RIT BS Photo '78 - Photomask Engineering Mgr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ammdigital Member 109 posts Joined Feb 2012 Location: Far Northern California More info | Dec 14, 2012 21:08 | #5 Just a heads-up. Oeijur does not have "Image editing OK". (Still I like the adjustment) Canon 5D Mark III (gripped), EF 16-35mm 2.8L II USM, EF 24-70mm 2.8L USM, EF 70-200 2.8 L IS II USM, EF 85mm 1.8 USM, 580EX II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PhotosGuy Cream of the Crop, R.I.P. More info | Dec 14, 2012 22:15 | #6 ammdigital wrote in post #15368126 Just a heads-up. Oeijur does not have "Image editing OK". Good point. FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
saea501 ... spilled over a little on the panties More info | Dec 15, 2012 06:16 | #7 This......I like the original shot. Remember what the DorMouse said.....feed your head.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 17, 2012 01:04 | #8 Thanks for the feedback. Image editing is ok by me, I just haven't edited my profile yet. Unfortunately, I don't own photoshop, so my PP options are limited.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
EL_PIC Goldmember 2,028 posts Likes: 1 Joined Dec 2009 Location: Austin Texas - Lucca Italy More info | Dec 17, 2012 09:22 | #9 Permanent banOeijur wrote in post #15375909 Thanks for the feedback. Image editing is ok by me, I just haven't edited my profile yet. Unfortunately, I don't own photoshop, so my PP options are limited. Just get it - any PP will be a step in the forward direction and there are many out there. EL_PIC - RIT BS Photo '78 - Photomask Engineering Mgr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cpam.pix Goldmember 1,275 posts Likes: 10 Joined Apr 2011 More info | Dec 17, 2012 19:56 | #10 GIMP is a poor [Smart???] person's PhotoShop. It can be downloaded for free. It doesn't have the whiz-bang features of some of the newer, ex$pen$ive editing packages, but is priced right. 1D-III with stuff to stick on it:
LOG IN TO REPLY |
OhLook insufferably pedantic. I can live with that. 24,901 posts Gallery: 105 photos Best ofs: 2 Likes: 16325 Joined Dec 2012 Location: California: SF Bay Area More info | Dec 17, 2012 20:45 | #11 Another program is Preview, which comes with a Mac--at least it came with this one--and enables basic changes such as increasing or decreasing exposure. PRONOUN ADVISORY: OhLook is a she. | Comments welcome
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MedicinSC Goldmember More info | If you are a student or educator in K-college, or a parent of a student in K-12, check out Adobe's educational pricing. PS CS6 can get gotten for $250 (I believe that's what it was). The educational license also allows commercial usage. Homeschool parents/students count as well.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Flo Gimmie Some Lovin 44,987 posts Likes: 16 Joined Jul 2007 Location: Nanaimo,B.C. More info | You needed to have the lower limbs also in the silhouette, getting the full form of the tree. Also, what is that ghostly image on the lower left limb? Grasses in the foreground? you're a great friend, but if Zombies chase us, I am tripping you.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 19, 2012 01:50 | #14 Flo wrote in post #15381876 You needed to have the lower limbs also in the silhouette, getting the full form of the tree. Also, what is that ghostly image on the lower left limb? Grasses in the foreground? I think the blurry images are grasses in the foreground. Good suggestion on the limbs being more in the silhouette. In retrospect, it would have been better if I shot at a lower angle looking up. I wish I had more time to set up and compose the shot, but the sun had already set by the time I got to this spot, and I set up quickly to try to get some of the fading sunlight in the picture.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is AlainPre 1502 guests, 166 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||