ross13 Member 151 posts Likes: 16 Joined Jan 2012 More info | Dec 15, 2012 04:09 | #1 My daughter, so I'm biased. Heavily processed by design.  Image hosted by forum (628205) © ross13 [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
saea501 ... spilled over a little on the panties  More info | Dec 15, 2012 05:47 | #2 Well, you're right about the beautiful young lady part. It looks a bit soft to me but that may be what you were going for here. She has very pretty eyes. Remember what the DorMouse said.....feed your head.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 15, 2012 06:17 | #3 Sorry, not a big fan of overprocessed images. The lack of sharpness seriously detracts from the overall image. Beautiful young woman. JMHO.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 15, 2012 07:08 | #4 Yes beautiful young lady but I have a hard time believing that the processing was what you were going for. Sorry but the processing is dreadful. Can you show us the original? 1DX, ID MKIII, 24-70 2.8L, 70-200 2.8L, 16-35 2.8L, 100 macro, 600EX-RTs, ST-E3-RT, Einsteins, Kacey Beauty Dish with a cracked grid, yada yada
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ItzSimplymike Senior Member  637 posts Likes: 2 Joined Feb 2012 More info | Dec 15, 2012 08:14 | #5 Great shot but no liking the PP
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Fester Senior Member 814 posts Likes: 3 Joined Sep 2011 Location: Texas, South of the border of Mexico More info | Keep an eye on her, she has beautiful eyes
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 15, 2012 08:41 | #7 Dano_nav wrote in post #15369248  Sorry, not a big fan of overprocessed images. The lack of sharpness seriously detracts from the overall image. Beautiful young woman. JMHO. The original was a reject. I was playing with dramatic processing on this and liked it on my computer, which needs calibrating. Things look way more saturated and contrasty on my monitor at work, so of course I don't know how it looks on yours.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
stickerboy111 Senior Member  267 posts Joined Jan 2011 Location: Quesnel BC More info | Dec 15, 2012 13:46 | #8 Good looking young women, but it is a very distracting image, way too soft. Canon 7D Gripped
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mjww Senior Member 675 posts Likes: 6 Joined Jul 2008 Location: Cayman Islands More info | Dec 15, 2012 22:12 | #9 I also agree that it is way to soft. Nice looking daughter though - future model! Equipment list - According to the wife - "how many more lenses do you need? Yet another camera?"
LOG IN TO REPLY |
picturepages Goldmember  1,267 posts Joined Mar 2006 Location: Montana More info | Dec 15, 2012 22:48 | #10 it looks like the focus spot was at her hair under her chin. You can see the back of her head looks in focus as well.  Image hosted by forum (628322) © picturepages [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. *~~I find.....the more I learn about photography, the more there is to learn about photography.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
watt100 Cream of the Crop 14,021 posts Likes: 34 Joined Jun 2008 More info | Dec 16, 2012 05:08 | #11 stickerboy111 wrote in post #15370411 Good looking young women, but it is a very distracting image, way too soft. yes, beautiful young lady but the photo looks odd - unfocused, unnatural colors, etc.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
russ71satellite Goldmember  More info | Dec 16, 2012 11:54 | #12 Nice edit, Picture Pages... Canon EOS 5D, 85mm 1.8, 50mm 1.8, Yongnuo YN560II, Dynaphos strobe, 16 inch beauty dish, Vagabond mini.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
HappySnapper90 Cream of the Crop 5,145 posts Likes: 3 Joined Aug 2008 Location: Cleveland, Ohio More info | Dec 16, 2012 16:19 | #13 Too heavily processed for my liking. How it's done, her hair on left and right looks in focus and her face (and eyes) out of focus. Your processsing makes the photo look out of focus.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
As stated, this was an experiment with dramatic processing. I've never tried it, and it obviously wasn't a hit. Here is a more reasonable edit. But, bear in mind it was originally a reject. It is a little OOF.  Image hosted by forum (628461) © ross13 [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 16, 2012 18:31 | #15 picturepages wrote in post #15371817 it looks like the focus spot was at her hair under her chin. You can see the back of her head looks in focus as well. It does sharpen up in PP but ya have to re-adjust contrast and what not because it really wigs out the pixels but I think it can be save-able for a smaller 8x10 print..maybe try in B&W or even something like this?... Sorry. I missed this earlier. I like it. Thanks.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is ealarcon 512 guests, 138 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
