Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 25 Dec 2012 (Tuesday) 11:45
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

What limits Shutter Sync?

 
rgs
Goldmember
Avatar
2,430 posts
Gallery: 176 photos
Likes: 1435
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Oklahoma City
     
Dec 25, 2012 16:43 |  #16

The 1/500 sec shutters are for leaf shutter that are open and close like the aperture blades in the lens. They expose the entire frame at once but 1/500 is about their limit for speed, flash synced or not. View cameras and some MF still use them.

Modern dSLRs use focal plane shutters. In these shutters, there are two curtains that chase each other across the film plane. At faster speeds the two curtains form a slit that races across the sensor but never exposes the entire sensor at the exact same time. That's what limits flash sync. Flash can only be used if the shutter speed is slow enough to allow the entire frame to be exposed at the same time.

Focal plane shutters in film SLRs were usually about 1/60th for 35mm and slower for MF. My Pentax 67 synced at 1/30th which is the speed I use most even today.

These shutters were usually horizontal travel shutters with cloth curtains. About 30 years ago the first vertical travel metal curtained focal plane shutters appeared. This is the modern type. At first they synced at about 1/125 but that speed moved up to where we are today as technology improved.

Long winded explanation. I hope it helps.


Canon 7d MkII, Canon 50D, Pentax 67, Canon 30D, Baker Custom 4x5, Canon EF 24-104mm f4, Canon EF 100mm f2.8 Macro, Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5, 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di VC

The Singular Image (external link)Richard Smith Photography (external link)
Richard Smith Real Estate Photography (external link)500PX (external link)
Fine Art America (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bobbyz
Cream of the Crop
20,506 posts
Likes: 3479
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Bay Area, CA
     
Dec 25, 2012 17:03 |  #17

I wish somebody could explain why can't have electronic shutters on CMOS. CCD can do it.


Fuji XT-1, 18-55mm
Sony A7rIV, , Tamron 28-200mm, Sigma 40mm f1.4 Art FE, Sony 85mm f1.8 FE, Sigma 105mm f1.4 Art FE
Fuji GFX50s, 23mm f4, 32-64mm, 45mm f2.8, 110mm f2, 120mm f4 macro
Canon 24mm TSE-II, 85mm f1.2 L II, 90mm TSE-II Macro, 300mm f2.8 IS I

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SkipD
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,476 posts
Likes: 165
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Southeastern WI, USA
     
Dec 25, 2012 19:50 |  #18

bobbyz wrote in post #15406611 (external link)
I wish somebody could explain why can't have electronic shutters on CMOS. CCD can do it.

It's because these DSLRs are not point-n-shoot cameras. They have a mirror in the optical path to the sensor and it makes much more sense to design them the way they do instead of like a point-n-shoot camera. Of course, if you choose to use the "Live View" feature available in newer DSLRs the shutter operation could be made to be electronic and is to a degree according to what I've read.


Skip Douglas
A few cameras and over 50 years behind them .....
..... but still learning all the time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JeffreyG
"my bits and pieces are all hard"
Avatar
15,540 posts
Gallery: 42 photos
Likes: 620
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Detroit, MI
     
Dec 25, 2012 20:27 |  #19

SkipD wrote in post #15406992 (external link)
It's because these DSLRs are not point-n-shoot cameras. They have a mirror in the optical path to the sensor and it makes much more sense to design them the way they do instead of like a point-n-shoot camera. Of course, if you choose to use the "Live View" feature available in newer DSLRs the shutter operation could be made to be electronic and is to a degree according to what I've read.

Actually Skip, the function of the mirror had nothing to do with whether or not the sensor needs a mechanical shutter in front of it or not. There have been CCD dSLRs without mechanical shutters. You just flip up the mirror, power on the sensor for the shutter duration and then turn it off.

I'm not a sensor engineer, but this seems to be less feasible for CMOS sensors.


My personal stuff:http://www.flickr.com/​photos/jngirbach/sets/ (external link)
I use a Canon 5DIII and a Sony A7rIII

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bobbyz
Cream of the Crop
20,506 posts
Likes: 3479
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Bay Area, CA
     
Dec 25, 2012 22:36 |  #20

Nikon D60 and Canon 1d did have elctronic shutters. Both were CCD based dSLRs. Now same can be done with CMOS and we get say 1/1000 max sync speed, that means huge for folks shooting with strobes.


Fuji XT-1, 18-55mm
Sony A7rIV, , Tamron 28-200mm, Sigma 40mm f1.4 Art FE, Sony 85mm f1.8 FE, Sigma 105mm f1.4 Art FE
Fuji GFX50s, 23mm f4, 32-64mm, 45mm f2.8, 110mm f2, 120mm f4 macro
Canon 24mm TSE-II, 85mm f1.2 L II, 90mm TSE-II Macro, 300mm f2.8 IS I

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TSchrief
Goldmember
Avatar
2,099 posts
Joined Aug 2012
Location: Bourbon, Indiana
     
Dec 26, 2012 07:02 |  #21
bannedPermanent ban

bobbyz wrote in post #15406191 (external link)
I am just looking forward to a day when we have electronic shutters for these CMOS sensors. Let me sync at any ss. Some day.:)

I use a shoe-mounted or Canon-master-contolled EX flash unit. I can use my flash at 1/8000 on all three of my bodies. Wait, I think the Elan only goes to 1/4000. I don't see sync speed being an issue. HSS is your friend. I know it cuts the range, but gradually, as you get further and further into the faster shutter speeds. I think at 1/8000 the range is limited to about 10 feet with f/1.8. HSS is a useful tool. The camera's sync speed is an artificial limit.


Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
apersson850
Obviously it's a good thing
Avatar
12,728 posts
Gallery: 35 photos
Likes: 679
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Traryd, Sweden
     
Dec 26, 2012 07:56 as a reply to  @ TSchrief's post |  #22

The camera's sync speed is very much a physical limit. High speed sync, on the other hand, is an aritficial way of getting past that limit.

With the introduction of the Canon EF in 1973, Canon did achieve a sync speed of 1/125 s. This was near the beginning of the FD lens range, and the EF model was the first to be faster than the then standard 1/60 s. At the other end of the FD era, the Canon T90, one of the most advanced cameras to take FD lenses, supported X-sync at 1/250 s.


Anders

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bobbyz
Cream of the Crop
20,506 posts
Likes: 3479
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Bay Area, CA
     
Dec 26, 2012 08:09 |  #23

TSchrief wrote in post #15408163 (external link)
I use a shoe-mounted or Canon-master-contolled EX flash unit. I can use my flash at 1/8000 on all three of my bodies. Wait, I think the Elan only goes to 1/4000. I don't see sync speed being an issue. HSS is your friend. I know it cuts the range, but gradually, as you get further and further into the faster shutter speeds. I think at 1/8000 the range is limited to about 10 feet with f/1.8. HSS is a useful tool. The camera's sync speed is an artificial limit.

You need to read up on HSS and why higher max sync speed will be so nice. i know folks here say they did it in good old days with much lower max sync speed but then but i dont want to haul 2400ws packs where ever i go.


Fuji XT-1, 18-55mm
Sony A7rIV, , Tamron 28-200mm, Sigma 40mm f1.4 Art FE, Sony 85mm f1.8 FE, Sigma 105mm f1.4 Art FE
Fuji GFX50s, 23mm f4, 32-64mm, 45mm f2.8, 110mm f2, 120mm f4 macro
Canon 24mm TSE-II, 85mm f1.2 L II, 90mm TSE-II Macro, 300mm f2.8 IS I

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
amfoto1
Cream of the Crop
10,331 posts
Likes: 146
Joined Aug 2007
Location: San Jose, California
     
Dec 26, 2012 08:56 |  #24

Before getting too concerned about flash sync speed, you might want to consider that during flash exposure the shutter speed might be irrelevant.

If the flash is the only or primary source of light (ambient light is not being recorded due to small aperture, low ISO and/or actual shutter speed), then the duration of the flash itself acts as a sort of shutter speed. With a lot of portable flash that's around 1/720. With studio strobes it's usually a bit slower. There are specialized flash where it's faster.

When shooting with flash as the main/only light source, you use the aperture size and ISO to control the exposure, distance or reach of the flash. The shutter speed can be the appropriate sync speed or any slower speed. It won't matter (until it's slow enough to start to record ambient light).

Previous responses are correct.... Leaf shutters give flash sync at all shutter speeds, but it is common for leaf shutter speeds to max out at 1/500 top speed.

Vertically running curtain shutters, like those in our DSLRs, are limited by the speed of the curtain movement. About the fastest synced speeds are 1/300, but most crop cameras have a max sync speed of 1/200 to 1/250 and many full frame are 1/200 or slower.

Modern DSLRs use electronically controlled curtain shutters that are very precise.

Mechancally controlled curtain shutters were common in the 1970s and earlier, often had a somewhat slower flash sync.

The vertically running Copal Square shutter introduced in 1960-62 was one of the first mechanical shutters capable of 1/125 sync (and a top speed of 1/2000, though most production was limited to 1/1000). It was later developed to offer as high as 1/250 sync (and a top sped of 1/4000)

Horizontally running curtain shutters, like those in a lot of FD-mount film Canon and many other SLRs up through the 1960s and 70s, plus many film rangefinders (these cloth shutters are largely based upon the Leica's, dating back to the 1930s) were very often limited to 1/90, 1/60 sync with electronic flash or as slow as 1/30 or 1/15 sync with flash bulbs (depended upon the type of bulb).

High Speed Sync works great... with some limitations. It limits the reach of flash, more-so with each higher shutter speed. You also can't use HSS in combination with rear curtain sync.


Alan Myers (external link) "Walk softly and carry a big lens."
5DII, 7DII, 7D, M5 & others. 10-22mm, Meike 12/2.8,Tokina 12-24/4, 20/2.8, EF-M 22/2, TS 24/3.5L, 24-70/2.8L, 28/1.8, 28-135 IS (x2), TS 45/2.8, 50/1.4, Sigma 56/1.4, Tamron 60/2.0, 70-200/4L IS, 70-200/2.8 IS, 85/1.8, Tamron 90/2.5, 100/2.8 USM, 100-400L II, 135/2L, 180/3.5L, 300/4L IS, 300/2.8L IS, 500/4L IS, EF 1.4X II, EF 2X II. Flashes, strobes & various access. - FLICKR (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
apersson850
Obviously it's a good thing
Avatar
12,728 posts
Gallery: 35 photos
Likes: 679
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Traryd, Sweden
     
Dec 26, 2012 09:18 |  #25

amfoto1 wrote in post #15408397 (external link)
You also can't use HSS in combination with rear curtain sync.

Well, there is no specific time when the rear curtain closes when using faster speeds than the sync speed, so that's not any real surprise.
Actually, you can't use rear curtain sync at times of 1/30 s or shorter.


Anders

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bobbyz
Cream of the Crop
20,506 posts
Likes: 3479
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Bay Area, CA
     
Dec 26, 2012 11:01 |  #26

Alan, flash sync matters the most when shooting outside. in studio, who cares.

if instead of 1/160 of my 5d I could do 1/640, i can use cheaper and lighter strobes. if i could do 1/1200 or so then those little speedlites will be so much more useful outside without going Joe Mcnally route.


Fuji XT-1, 18-55mm
Sony A7rIV, , Tamron 28-200mm, Sigma 40mm f1.4 Art FE, Sony 85mm f1.8 FE, Sigma 105mm f1.4 Art FE
Fuji GFX50s, 23mm f4, 32-64mm, 45mm f2.8, 110mm f2, 120mm f4 macro
Canon 24mm TSE-II, 85mm f1.2 L II, 90mm TSE-II Macro, 300mm f2.8 IS I

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TSchrief
Goldmember
Avatar
2,099 posts
Joined Aug 2012
Location: Bourbon, Indiana
     
Dec 26, 2012 11:32 |  #27
bannedPermanent ban

bobbyz wrote in post #15408272 (external link)
You need to read up on HSS and why higher max sync speed will be so nice. i know folks here say they did it in good old days with much lower max sync speed but then but i dont want to haul 2400ws packs where ever i go.

I admit to not knowing much about flash photography. I do know that HSS can't possibly use any more than one full capacitor charge worth of juice. And I have to agree, using a full-charge with every shot would be extremely power consuming. I guess I should have said that "I" don't find the sync speed limiting. If I need to use fill at 1/800 or something, I just do it. But I am only taking a shot or two.

Speaking of the good old days.... I used to shoot manual film bodies and discovered that if you want to push things, you could get an extra stop of shutter speed out of the bodies when using manual flash. If you pushed it much further, you'd get the shutter blocking part of the frame. Today's cameras just push the shutter speed back to sync-speed automatically.


Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tzalman
Fatal attraction.
Avatar
13,497 posts
Likes: 213
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Gesher Haziv, Israel
     
Dec 26, 2012 11:47 |  #28

bobbyz wrote in post #15406611 (external link)
I wish somebody could explain why can't have electronic shutters on CMOS. CCD can do it.

SkipD wrote in post #15406992 (external link)
It's because these DSLRs are not point-n-shoot cameras. They have a mirror in the optical path to the sensor and it makes much more sense to design them the way they do instead of like a point-n-shoot camera. Of course, if you choose to use the "Live View" feature available in newer DSLRs the shutter operation could be made to be electronic and is to a degree according to what I've read.

JeffreyG wrote in post #15407098 (external link)
Actually Skip, the function of the mirror had nothing to do with whether or not the sensor needs a mechanical shutter in front of it or not. There have been CCD dSLRs without mechanical shutters. You just flip up the mirror, power on the sensor for the shutter duration and then turn it off.

I'm not a sensor engineer, but this seems to be less feasible for CMOS sensors.

With a CMOS sensor each column is read independently, one after another going from left to right across the sensor. It is possible to perform three operations that roll across the sensor at the same speed - first each column is activated, then after a certain amount of time (the exposure time) the accumulated charge is read and the data sent to the A/D converter, and finally each column is flushed and reset, ready for the next exposure. This constitutes an electronic shutter. However, the speed of the A/D converter acts as a limiting factor, determining the maximum speed at which the "read curtain" can cross the sensor. It can work in a P&S with a tiny sensor but in high resolution/large sensor cameras the best speed obtainable would be too slow for hand-held. So in a DSLR the mechanical shutter opens and the sensor is activated simultaneously, then after the shutter closes the slower operations of reading and resetting each column are performed.


Elie / אלי

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
watt100
Cream of the Crop
14,021 posts
Likes: 34
Joined Jun 2008
     
Dec 26, 2012 12:22 |  #29

apersson850 wrote in post #15408254 (external link)
The camera's sync speed is very much a physical limit. High speed sync, on the other hand, is an aritficial way of getting past that limit.

right, and there are other "artificial" ways to get around the sync speed, I can get 1/320 without seeing any black bar or darkened area using a yongnuo flash in manual mode on an XSi (450D). Outdoors for fill flash I get 1/400 shutter speed using a flash. I've cheated the physical limit !




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JohnB57
Goldmember
1,511 posts
Likes: 23
Joined Jul 2010
Location: Holmfirth, Yorkshire, England
     
Dec 26, 2012 12:39 |  #30

watt100 wrote in post #15409032 (external link)
right, and there are other "artificial" ways to get around the sync speed, I can get 1/320 without seeing any black bar or darkened area using a yongnuo flash in manual mode on an XSi (450D). Outdoors for fill flash I get 1/400 shutter speed using a flash. I've cheated the physical limit !

What's your explanation of how this worked other than tolerance built into the notional maximum sync speed?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

6,496 views & 0 likes for this thread, 19 members have posted to it.
What limits Shutter Sync?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ANebinger
1059 guests, 162 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.