Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 26 Dec 2012 (Wednesday) 20:05
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Handheld Metering?

 
LostArk
Senior Member
418 posts
Likes: 15
Joined Apr 2012
     
Dec 26, 2012 20:05 |  #1

Just a quick question. When using a hand held incident meter, do I just dial in the reading into my camera or do I need to take the reflectance of the subject into account like with the in-camera reflected meter? Put another way, if I use a handheld meter to measure the light falling on a black cat and then dial in the reading into my camera, will the cat be rendered black or gray? Thanks!


www.unknoahble.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FlyingPhotog
Cream of the "Prop"
Avatar
57,560 posts
Likes: 178
Joined May 2007
Location: Probably Chasing Aircraft
     
Dec 26, 2012 20:07 |  #2

It should come out black.

Your camera meter should show at least a stop (maybe two) slower shutter or larger aperture to try and make a grey cat.


Jay
Crosswind Images (external link)
Facebook Fan Page (external link)

"If you aren't getting extraordinary images from today's dSLRs, regardless of brand, it's not the camera!" - Bill Fortney, Nikon Corp.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RandyMN
Goldmember
3,131 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Aug 2005
     
Dec 26, 2012 20:09 |  #3

Handheld meters can measure both incident or reflective readings. If you take an incident reading by pointing it at the camera position, then your back cat should be fine using those settings from the meter. If you use the reflected light reading pointed at the cat, then it will need adjustment.

Usually there will be a separate attachment between incident and reflected light readings. Or as with mine, it has a separate button.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LostArk
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
418 posts
Likes: 15
Joined Apr 2012
     
Dec 26, 2012 20:12 |  #4

That's what I thought, thanks!


www.unknoahble.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TooManyShots
Cream of the Crop
10,203 posts
Likes: 532
Joined Jan 2008
Location: NYC
     
Dec 26, 2012 20:30 |  #5
bannedPermanent ban

Your light meter would meter everything in 18% gray. Even black would be gray, the exposure needed to make it gray looking. That's why if metering off a black subject, you should underexpose a bit by 1 stop. White subject is +2 stops. Your light meter usefulness is limited without a spot degree attachment. Incident metering could only measure the ambient lighting. You would literally need to put your meter next to the subject to get an accurate reading. Reflective metering without a spot degree attachment is totally inaccurate. The metered area is too wide and may contain more highlights than shadows.


One Imaging Photography (external link) and my Flickr (external link)
Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LostArk
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
418 posts
Likes: 15
Joined Apr 2012
     
Dec 26, 2012 20:40 |  #6

TooManyShots wrote in post #15410715 (external link)
Your light meter would meter everything in 18% gray. Even black would be gray, the exposure needed to make it gray looking. That's why if metering off a black subject, you should underexpose a bit by 1 stop. White subject is +2 stops. Your light meter usefulness is limited without a spot degree attachment. Incident metering could only measure the ambient lighting. You would literally need to put your meter next to the subject to get an accurate reading. Reflective metering with a spot degree attachment is totally inaccurate. The metered area is too wide and may contain more highlights than shadows.

Ok now I'm confused. If I take an incident reading of the light falling on my subject you're saying I'd have to make the same exposure compensation as if I were using a reflected meter?


www.unknoahble.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RandyMN
Goldmember
3,131 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Aug 2005
     
Dec 26, 2012 20:49 |  #7

I think he was saying that incident light meter reflective reads are useless without a spot attachment, and that the attachment is not accurate because it reads too wide of the photo area.

I think spots are plenty accurate if you use the tool wisely. Not sure what type of meter you have, but I've had them start at 20 degrees, 5, 2 and 1.

He also stated that to be accurate with the incident meter, which most likely has a white globe, you must stand at the position of the subject and point towards the camera direction to be accurate.

Sorry for speaking for someone else, but just paraphrasing what was said.

Meters are tools that must be used correctly. They are as accurate as the person knowing what to do with the readings




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TooManyShots
Cream of the Crop
10,203 posts
Likes: 532
Joined Jan 2008
Location: NYC
     
Dec 26, 2012 20:53 |  #8
bannedPermanent ban

LostArk wrote in post #15410742 (external link)
Ok now I'm confused. If I take an incident reading of the light falling on my subject you're saying I'd have to make the same exposure compensation as if I were using a reflected meter?


No, only if you are metering off directly a black subject (such as using the meter in the reflective mode at a very narrow angle). Then, you need to underexpose the shot by 1 stop or more to make the black subject to look black, not gray.

In the incident metering, the color as well as the light intensity of the subject does not matter.


One Imaging Photography (external link) and my Flickr (external link)
Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TooManyShots
Cream of the Crop
10,203 posts
Likes: 532
Joined Jan 2008
Location: NYC
     
Dec 26, 2012 20:58 |  #9
bannedPermanent ban

RandyMN wrote in post #15410761 (external link)
I think he was saying that incident light meter reflective reads are useless without a spot attachment, and that the attachment is not accurate because it reads too wide of the photo area.

I think spots are plenty accurate if you use the tool wisely. Not sure what type of meter you have, but I've had them start at 20 degrees, 5, 2 and 1.

He also stated that to be accurate with the incident meter, which most likely has a white globe, you must stand at the position of the subject and point towards the camera direction to be accurate.

Sorry for speaking for someone else, but just paraphrasing what was said.

Meters are tools that must be used correctly. They are as accurate as the person knowing what to do with the readings


Thanks. :) Yeah, incident metering could only approximate the light falling on the subject. It can't not take into the account of the color as well as how reflective it is or whether or not the subject is reflecting any light at all. Reflective metering is more useful only if you can narrow the coverage.


One Imaging Photography (external link) and my Flickr (external link)
Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LostArk
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
418 posts
Likes: 15
Joined Apr 2012
     
Dec 26, 2012 22:38 as a reply to  @ TooManyShots's post |  #10

IMAGE: http://www.palzoo.net/file/pic/gallery/1311_view.jpg

www.unknoahble.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TooManyShots
Cream of the Crop
10,203 posts
Likes: 532
Joined Jan 2008
Location: NYC
     
Dec 26, 2012 23:07 as a reply to  @ LostArk's post |  #11
bannedPermanent ban

Heheheh.....incident metering is basically metering the ambient light. Like an overhead light source or lamp. When you put the dome on, you are metering the incident light. The ambient value would change depending how close or how far you are from the light source. You don't point your lighter meter, in the incident mode, to the subject and to read off the exposure value. Instead, you point the dome to the light source and put it near the subject. This would determine the exposure value of the overhead light hitting the subject at the same distance. You are still not metering the light falling off from the subject at all. Incident metering would work if the subject's color is neutral.

If you want to meter the light falling off from the subject, you have to use the reflective mode, dome off. And to point directly at the subject, at a very close distance. Many light meter you can get a spot degree attachment. Right now, your light meter in the reflective mode is probably reading off the light falling off from the subject at 100 degree. The scope is too wide. You need to narrow that down to 10 or 5 degree. With a spot degree meter attachment, you can literally meter off the light falling off from the subject's hair.


One Imaging Photography (external link) and my Flickr (external link)
Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,425 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4521
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Dec 27, 2012 00:31 |  #12

RandyMN wrote in post #15410761 (external link)
I think he was saying that incident light meter reflective reads are useless without a spot attachment, and that the attachment is not accurate because it reads too wide of the photo area.

Oh gawd, how to really confuse a guy by using two divergent terms, one modifying the other, and then mix in a third concept!!!

  • Handheld meters are Incident or they are Reflective at any particular time, but they cannot be BOTH at the same time
  • Incident meters NEVER use spot attachments; only REFLECTED light meters use spot attachments


  • Handheld incident meters should be held at the subject position and face the camera lens (or in the same type of light that falls on the subject) and incident meters do not see different reflectivity of a subject in black vs. a subject in white, and incident readings do not need to be compensated.
  • Handheld reflected light meters should be held to look AT the subject and reflected light meters do see different reflectivity of a subject in black vs. a subject in white, and reflected light readings DO need to be compensated.

You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DC ­ Fan
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,881 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 53
Joined Oct 2005
     
Dec 27, 2012 04:42 |  #13

LostArk wrote in post #15410642 (external link)
Just a quick question. When using a hand held incident meter, do I just dial in the reading into my camera or do I need to take the reflectance of the subject into account like with the in-camera reflected meter? Put another way, if I use a handheld meter to measure the light falling on a black cat and then dial in the reading into my camera, will the cat be rendered black or gray? Thanks!

Incident-metered images with subjects of various brightness. The meter gave a result of 1/500 at f/2.8 and ISO 6400, a setting that was used in the camera.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE


IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE


IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE


Whether the subject was dark or light, it was rendered correctly with the reading from the incident meter. That is the reason to use incident metering; (external link) because the technique measures the light falling on a subject, it avoids the inconsistency of reflected metering, which can be fooled by alternating dark and light subjects. In situations such as the above, where the light is static, incident metering (external link) works very well.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gromeo
Senior Member
981 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2007
Location: Orlando, FL
     
Dec 27, 2012 07:43 |  #14

DCFan linked a couple already but here is another good article by Sekonic http://www.sekonic.com …Use-a-Handheld-Meter.aspx (external link)


Nikon D4 and 60 2.8D Micro, 24-70 2.8G, 70-200 2.8G VRII, 200-400 VRII, SB800, SB600, Pocket Wizards, 4x WL-1600, Quantum Turbo 2x2, Sekonic 358 meter, TT AS, Takeoff, Belt System
http://rguzmanphoto.ph​otoshelter.com/ (external link)
http://www.romeoguzman​photography.com (external link)
http://www.sportsshoot​er.com/rguzman (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RandyMN
Goldmember
3,131 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Aug 2005
     
Dec 27, 2012 12:54 |  #15

Wilt wrote in post #15411338 (external link)
Oh gawd, how to really confuse a guy by using two divergent terms, one modifying the other, and then mix in a third concept!!!
  • Handheld meters are Incident or they are Reflective at any particular time, but they cannot be BOTH at the same time
  • Incident meters NEVER use spot attachments; only REFLECTED light meters use spot attachments


  • Handheld incident meters should be held at the subject position and face the camera lens (or in the same type of light that falls on the subject) and incident meters do not see different reflectivity of a subject in black vs. a subject in white, and incident readings do not need to be compensated.
  • Handheld reflected light meters should be held to look AT the subject and reflected light meters do see different reflectivity of a subject in black vs. a subject in white, and reflected light readings DO need to be compensated.

Okay, so I failed... Next time I'll just stay silent.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,706 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
Handheld Metering?
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Marcsaa
1383 guests, 119 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.