Okay please tell how bad this is lol not about the positioning of the model (me) but exposure please.
Natural light coming from a window and then a flash and umbrella. Flash set to 1/34. Ok go!
tristan Senior Member 322 posts Likes: 2 Joined Feb 2006 Location: Missouri More info | Dec 30, 2012 13:51 | #1 Okay please tell how bad this is lol not about the positioning of the model (me) but exposure please.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 30, 2012 15:12 | #2 |
fashionrider Goldmember 1,093 posts Likes: 22 Joined Dec 2011 More info | Dec 30, 2012 15:18 | #4 Definitely throw it away. You'll get the same reaction from a blind man and from me Gear List (5D3, 70-200 f2.8L IS II, Sigma 85mm f1.4, Sigma 35mm f1.4, 50 f1.8, 24-105L, Alien Bee lights, etc etc)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Thorrulz Goldmember  More info | First time I saw an entire picture disappear into the background. If that is what you were going for then you succeeded perfectly. Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 30, 2012 16:28 | #6 Looks just a little overexposed 1DX, ID MKIII, 24-70 2.8L, 70-200 2.8L, 16-35 2.8L, 100 macro, 600EX-RTs, ST-E3-RT, Einsteins, Kacey Beauty Dish with a cracked grid, yada yada
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sgtbueno Senior Member  807 posts Likes: 5 Joined May 2012 Location: Richmond, VA More info | Dec 30, 2012 18:06 | #7 Try to use just natural light, you don't need that flash, it is almost making the image non existing. Wedding Photography by Felix Bueno Photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Point-n-shoot-n Goldmember 2,037 posts Likes: 1127 Joined Jun 2008 Location: Tampa, Florida More info | Dec 30, 2012 18:16 | #8 Next time take the lens cap off...........and don't process it so much! Canon 5D mk IV, Canon 5D mk iii, Canon 5d classic, Rebel XTI 400D 18-55 kit lens, Canon EF 85mm 1:1.8, Canon EF 17-40 F4L, Quantaray 70-300 1:4-5.6 LD, Canon 70-200 F2.8 iiL, Canon EF135 F2 L, Canon 200 F2 L, Tamron 28-75 1:2.8 , 2 alien bee 800's, 430 EXii, 580 EXii, rectangular and octo softboxes, assorted umbrellas, portable backdrops, radio triggers and still adding.............
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 30, 2012 18:44 | #9 Exposure is definitely lacking here. I would go so far as to say that there was no exposure at all. Laurence
LOG IN TO REPLY |
wards75 Member 175 posts Joined May 2012 Location: North Carolina More info | Dec 30, 2012 20:38 | #10 Anyway you can share the EXIF data? Looks a little lacking to me, not sure what it is but..it's missing something. 1D3---"Nifty Fifty"---24-70 L MK 1---70-200 2.8 ISL--580ex ii---430ex
LOG IN TO REPLY |
leeleeRT Member  103 posts Joined Jan 2010 Location: New Hampshire More info | Dec 30, 2012 20:39 | #11 They say 90% of life is showing up... "There is nothing worse than a sharp image of a fuzzy concept" - Ansel Adams
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Shufu Goldmember 1,658 posts Likes: 9750 Joined Oct 2012 Location: Saipan CNMI More info | Dec 30, 2012 20:59 | #12 Hmmmmm....seems Ive seen this picture before...just cant remember where....maybe, cause they all look alike? Saipan, where we proudly put the fun in dysfunctional every chance we get!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Mihai Bucur 1410 guests, 170 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
