tdaugharty wrote:
Then you must be looking hard @ the D200
Then you must be looking hard @ the D200
Mayve he bought the 85mm after becoming an Nikon owner, it may be slow, but eventually he'll fully turn canon fully j/k
ACDCROCKS 321 123 33  2,931 posts Likes: 1 Joined Sep 2005 Location: in your attic More info | tdaugharty wrote: Then you must be looking hard @ the D200 Mayve he bought the 85mm after becoming an Nikon owner, it may be slow, but eventually he'll fully turn canon fully canon weight
LOG IN TO REPLY |
grego Cream of the Crop  8,819 posts Likes: 2 Joined May 2005 Location: UCLA More info | Jan 08, 2006 01:49 | #77 At this point, having used all the lens i've used and read about, Go UCLA
LOG IN TO REPLY |
roli_bark Senior Member  918 posts Joined Oct 2005 More info | StealthLude wrote: WOW.... WOW Where was this photo taken? Athens Olympics 2004...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mbze430 Goldmember  2,454 posts Joined Feb 2005 Location: Chino Hills More info | Jan 10, 2006 05:27 | #79 If I can only have one L lens, it would be the 28-300. It's the only L lens with enough versatility of range, and "ok" optics for this range of zoom. Gear List
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Krapo Goldmember  1,018 posts Likes: 4 Joined Sep 2005 Location: Brussels, Belgium More info | Jan 10, 2006 05:43 | #80 It would be my 80-200 f/2.8L, but let's say I would take its younger brother, the 70-200L IS François
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TheLimey Senior Member  More info | Ronald S. Jr. wrote: I'd probably have to say the 35 1.4L. I just haven't seen better IQ anywhere. I'm also in for that L just the range i use most of the time 7D,20D,1V.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
chtgrubbs Goldmember 1,675 posts Joined Jul 2003 More info | Jan 11, 2006 09:19 | #82 On a 20D, the 17-40L. On a 5D, the 24-105L.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
rklepper Dignity-Esteem-Compassion  9,019 posts Gallery: 2 photos Likes: 14 Joined Dec 2003 Location: No longer living at the center of the known universe, moved just slightly to the right. Iowa, USA. More info | Jan 11, 2006 13:50 | #83 Couldn't do with just 1, have to at least have 2 L's: 24-70 f2.8L and the 200f2.8L. Doc Klepper in the USA
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cimager Member  32 posts Joined Jan 2003 Location: Western Massachusetts More info | Jan 11, 2006 13:56 | #84 70-200 2.8 IS or if I had one the 135L f/2.0 Canon 5D
LOG IN TO REPLY |
kenta Member  58 posts Joined Dec 2005 More info | Jan 11, 2006 15:25 | #85 Well everyone asks for normal and telezoom range, or wide angel primes. I wish to know how 50mm f1.0L would do on my cameras. Kenta
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 1703 guests, 102 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
