Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Astronomy & Celestial 
Thread started 04 Jan 2013 (Friday) 14:29
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

M31 with the 70-200 f/4L

 
Madweasel
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,224 posts
Likes: 61
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Fareham, UK
     
Jan 04, 2013 14:29 |  #1

I've been an occasional dabbler in astrophotography over the years, but have always struggled with doing a decent job of processing to get rid of fairly heavily light-polluted skies. As I've had the luxury of some extra time while off work for Christmas, I've been looking at some tutorials and generally practising with Photoshop. I've been working a few different ways to get the best out of a stack of 5 images I took of the Andromeda Galaxy, M31, in October 2009 with the 40D, and am now sufficiently happy to show my work here.

I realise the colours are still a little questionable, but from the orange/brown of the originals I'm very pleased to get this far. I've also been very impressed with Deep Sky Stacker and the way it can bring out faint stars from the original frames. This was just 5 lights, with no darks, flats, etc.; each shot was 40s (on a homemade driven mount) at f/4, 200mm, ISO 1600. I just cropped in a bit as the corners were a bit darker and not as good as the rest.

Very careful analysis of the full-size image alongside Wikisky shows the limiting magnitude (for stars) is about 15.3, which I'm very pleased with.

Another interesting point is the two satellite tracks in the lower part of the image. DSS has added the track from each frame, so they appear as long dashes, each dash representing 40 seconds' movement. This means they must be in pretty high orbits. I've no idea what they might be.

Here's my best image so far. I'd welcome helpful pointers for improvement.

IMAGE: http://i72.photobucket.com/albums/i192/garlicpickle/Canon/lrsmall-6_zps6c753c8a.jpg

Mark.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
neimad19
Senior Member
Avatar
767 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Mar 2012
     
Jan 04, 2013 21:23 |  #2

Wow nice shot! I cant really give much advice besides keep going at it! How did you make the home made mount?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Celestron
Cream of the Crop
8,641 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 406
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Texas USA
     
Jan 04, 2013 23:20 |  #3

Very nice ! Tracking certainly looks good ! Got a picture of your home-made mount ?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Madweasel
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,224 posts
Likes: 61
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Fareham, UK
     
Jan 05, 2013 12:04 as a reply to  @ Celestron's post |  #4

Here is the mount as it was set up for this image. It's an industrial 24-hr timer switch (used in the old days for switching street lamps on and off). The difference between solar time and sidereal time is insignificant for short exposures.

IMAGE: http://i72.photobucket.com/albums/i192/garlicpickle/Canon/DSCF1028.jpg

I got an engineer friend to make me a threaded brass adapter to go on the shaft of the timer.

IMAGE: http://i72.photobucket.com/albums/i192/garlicpickle/Canon/DSCF1027.jpg

The timer body is screwed to a piece of wood, and underneath I screwed a Manfrotto quick-release plate, so the whole thing would go on my heavy-duty tripod.

IMAGE: http://i72.photobucket.com/albums/i192/garlicpickle/Canon/DSCF1026.jpg

Then I put a lighter-duty ballhead on the threaded adapter. The whole thing is fairly lightweight and not terribly strong, so it works best with lighter gear, but, when balanced carefully, I've even had successful images from the 100-400L (though I did have to replace the single screw shown above with three, to take the weight).

IMAGE: http://i72.photobucket.com/albums/i192/garlicpickle/Canon/DSCF1025.jpg

I'd love something like the Astrotrac, but they're so expensive. My solution isn't fantastic and can be a pain to use, but as you can see, with care it can produce very satisfying results.

Mark.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SteveInNZ
Goldmember
1,426 posts
Likes: 89
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
     
Jan 05, 2013 18:10 |  #5

I hope you're running that through an RCD or transformer. I can see a serious ouch just waiting to get you.
Other than that, I like that you're getting results without spending up on shiny new stuff.


"Treat every photon with respect" - David Malin.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Madweasel
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,224 posts
Likes: 61
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Fareham, UK
     
Jan 06, 2013 09:19 |  #6

Thanks Steve, yes, all protected by an RCCB.


Mark.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
stickman513
Senior Member
588 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2011
     
Jan 12, 2013 16:47 |  #7

WOW, great capture with homemade set up! I love it. One question, how do you align the base? Do you just set the angle for your Latitude pointed at Polaris?


Doug
R
24-105L | 70-200L 2.8 | 10-22 | 105 Macro | 85 2.0
430 EX II | Yongnuo Triggers | Manfrotto Legs | Lee & Marumi Filters

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Madweasel
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,224 posts
Likes: 61
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Fareham, UK
     
Jan 12, 2013 17:15 |  #8

Thanks! Yes, that does make it a bit hit-and-miss, but I just try to line it up with Polaris by eye. For short exposures like these the accuracy does not have to be absolute, but it's worth spending some time on it. I've often thought I should at least add a little sighting pointer or something, to make it easier.


Mark.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
stickman513
Senior Member
588 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2011
     
Jan 13, 2013 12:53 |  #9

Great results and thanks for sharing!
looking forward to more!


Doug
R
24-105L | 70-200L 2.8 | 10-22 | 105 Macro | 85 2.0
430 EX II | Yongnuo Triggers | Manfrotto Legs | Lee & Marumi Filters

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cgatto
Senior Member
Avatar
877 posts
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Yellowknife, Canada
     
Jan 17, 2013 01:32 |  #10

Love seeing a good homemade setup. Really makes you appreciate the effort that goes into these photos! That's awesome!


Canon 7D, Canon 30D, Canon 50mm f/1.4, Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8, Canon 70-200 f/4L
My Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mtsheron
Member
Avatar
37 posts
Joined Feb 2013
Location: western, NC
     
Feb 12, 2013 09:16 |  #11

Helpful hints! Heck, your the MacGuyver of the astronomy world to me friend!


I am just a spoke in a broken wheel.......

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,860 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
M31 with the 70-200 f/4L
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Astronomy & Celestial 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer
1561 guests, 142 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.