Those were all awesome shots..... THANK YOU all for confirming that I made the right choice with this one! Obviously, it will work harder in low light or night-time sporting events, but, right out of the box today, it was just tack-sharp, no issues, autofocus was quick, and I tested it in the parking lot on a rather dark and overcast day. I got a sharp image and I was hand-holding it.... right then I told my guy... "SOLD!" If it will give me a sharp hand held shot at 500 on a dark day, then I can only imagine the possibilities of this baby on a regular, sunny/light overcast day.
Now, I am not going to go SIGMA crazy from now on... still just purchased the 17-40L, but maybe one of us out there has a SIGMA f/2.8 24-70????? I have heard 75% good reviews about this lens, particularly better as the lens gets towards the 2005 time-frame.... worse reviews appear to be 2004 and 2003 copies.
If I can get a good EX 24-70 2.8 Sigma..... my lineup of lenses will be done! Oh yeah, except for the 35L and 85L....... oh and the 135L and the 300L..... oh and the... never mind... guess I'm not done...