Feedback on DPP DLO module

agedbriar wrote in post #15463072
One more lens now compatible with DLO: the EF 100mm F2.8L Macro IS USM.
Is it possible that I missed it yesterday?

Looking forward to finding the EF 85 F1.8 tomorrow...

I'm looking forward to finding the non L version of the 100mm on the list

mwsilver wrote in post #15467164
I noticed that as well and assumed that DLO included its own CA adjustments. Obviously a bad assumption on my part.

I have just found these pages on the canon japanes web site that contains lot of info about the DLO : http://web.canon.jp …g/dlo/factor/in​dex02.html

It suggests that DLO corrects CA...
There is also a list of compatible lenses there (don't know if it's up to date) and lot of samples.

BTW, I found this info about the shooting distance parameter :

For images taken with EF lenses which do not have distance
information, an exclamation mark (!) will be shown above the "Shooting 
distance information" slider. In this case, optimal compensation can be 
obtained by manually entering the shooting distance.

When an EF lens is used, shooting distance can be entered manually also 
if data are available. This allows you to fine-tune the effect for best 
compensation.

Shooting distance information is always included for all EF-M lenses, 
and therefore manual input is not possible.

yb98 wrote in post #15467625
BTW, I found this info about the shooting distance parameter :

For images taken with EF lenses which do not have distance
information, an exclamation mark (!) will be shown above the "Shooting 
distance information" slider. In this case, optimal compensation can be 
obtained by manually entering the shooting distance.

When an EF lens is used, shooting distance can be entered manually also 
if data are available. This allows you to fine-tune the effect for best 
compensation.

Shooting distance information is always included for all EF-M lenses, 
and therefore manual input is not possible.

BTW, I just downloaded the trial version of DPP+ again. I had a few issues when I tried a previous version but I have more time now to resolve them. Do I use the DLO feature after using DPP+, before using it, or is there no difference when I use DLO?

yb98 wrote in post #15467607
I have just found these pages on the canon japanes web site that contains lot of info about the DLO : http://web.canon.jp …g/dlo/factor/in​dex02.html

It suggests that DLO corrects CA...
There is also a list of compatible lenses there (don't know if it's up to date) and lot of samples.

Thanks for the link, the list shows 2 out of 3 of my Canon lenses
•EF-S18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM
•EF50mm f/1.4 USM

but neither 100mm f/2.8 were on that list.

mwsilver wrote in post #15467756
BTW, I just downloaded the trial version of DPP+ again. I had a few issues when I tried a previous version but I have more time now to resolve them. Do I use the DLO feature after using DPP+, before using it, or is there no difference when I use DLO?

I have never used DPP++ with DLO before, so I'll make some tests and let you know how to do and do update the manual.

JasonMK wrote in post #15467766
Thanks for the link, the list shows 2 out of 3 of my Canon lenses
•EF-S18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM
•EF50mm f/1.4 USM

but neither 100mm f/2.8 were on that list.

Some lenses have been added since that list was compiled. But the older 100 Macro hasn't been included yet - the new 100 L IS Macro is.

yb98 wrote in post #15467772
I have never used DPP++ with DLO before, so I'll make some tests and let you know how to do and do update the manual.

Thank you.

agedbriar wrote in post #15467078
Testing with 5D3 + 28/1.8 files, DLO alone appears to have no direct effect on CA and I seem unable to combine both DLO and CA edits.

If I do DLO first, the CA tool gets disabled as soon as DLO is
saved. If I do CA first, the CA edit is cancelled when DLO is
saved.

Any suggestion?

Extracted from DPP's Help :

Images cannot be corrected for [Chromatic aberration] in 
[Lens aberration  correction] if the Digital Lens Optimizer has 
been applied.

any DLO news for 180/3.5L Macro?

no, but have you tried to use the profil of the 100mm macro instead ?