Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 05 Jan 2013 (Saturday) 11:57
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

need help from people with strong understanding of composition

 
Unknown456
Member
90 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2011
     
Jan 05, 2013 11:57 |  #1

I like this photo alot and I want to understand the compositional elements that make this shot work so I can employ them in other shots, but can't seem to put my finger on exactly what makes it work.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2013/01/1/LQ_631339.jpg
Image hosted by forum (631339) © Unknown456 [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
OhLook
insufferably pedantic. I can live with that.
Avatar
24,855 posts
Gallery: 105 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 16244
Joined Dec 2012
Location: California: SF Bay Area
     
Jan 05, 2013 12:24 |  #2

I can't say why you like it. People are different and all that. I can describe a few of its compositional strengths.

The gentle inverted-U curve of the upper edge of the main hill echoes the similar shape made by the top of the tree, considered as an outline.

It's bottom-heavy. Of course, you automatically get that with most daylight landscapes that include sky.

Within the tree (leaving out the trunk), the zigzaggy structure of the thickest and second-thickest branches keeps a viewer's gaze moving around without exiting. Furthermore, these lines are diagonals. I tend to prefer compositions based on diagonals over those where the strongest linear elements are vertical and horizontal; this may not be everyone's thing, I don't know.

Some areas have a lot of detail and others are plain. This difference is a way of introducing contrast (not contrast in the photographic sense).


PRONOUN ADVISORY: OhLook is a she. | A FEW CORRECT SPELLINGS: lens, aperture, amateur, hobbyist, per se, raccoon, whoa | Comments welcome

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Unknown456
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
90 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2011
     
Jan 05, 2013 13:32 |  #3

OhLook wrote in post #15448251 (external link)
I can't say why you like it. People are different and all that. I can describe a few of its compositional strengths.

The gentle inverted-U curve of the upper edge of the main hill echoes the similar shape made by the top of the tree, considered as an outline.

It's bottom-heavy. Of course, you automatically get that with most daylight landscapes that include sky.

Within the tree (leaving out the trunk), the zigzaggy structure of the thickest and second-thickest branches keeps a viewer's gaze moving around without exiting. Furthermore, these lines are diagonals. I tend to prefer compositions based on diagonals over those where the strongest linear elements are vertical and horizontal; this may not be everyone's thing, I don't know.

Some areas have a lot of detail and others are plain. This difference is a way of introducing contrast (not contrast in the photographic sense).

Thanks for the input. My eye was drawn to the hill and it seemed like a strong element but I couldn't put my finger on why, your explination helped. I was also getting kind of an erie vibe from the shot and you mentioning of contrast made me realize that it is coming from the contrast between the "serene" sky and the complexity of the limbs in the tree.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
The ­ Freeman
Member
Avatar
196 posts
Likes: 4
Joined May 2012
     
Jan 05, 2013 14:13 |  #4

not sure if this helps your thought pocess but for me .. Depth! Thats what hits me


pixeljunkieeffigy (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
oklaiss
Senior Member
471 posts
Joined Nov 2011
Location: San Francisco, CA
     
Jan 05, 2013 14:38 |  #5

Similar to something I took a while back

IMAGE: http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7265/7524705112_94cb742b4a_c.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/5dc/7524705112/  (external link)
IMG_1762 (external link) by Owen Klaiss (external link), on Flickr
I think as others have mentioned, what makes this photograph unique is the rolling hills that somewhat mimic the shape of the tree.

5D Mark II Gripped, 60D Gripped, 450D, 24-105 f/4L, 85 1.8, 70-200 f/4L IS, Nifty Fifty, 28 1.8, B+W/Lee/Cokin/Hitech filters, 430ex II x2
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

756 views & 0 likes for this thread, 4 members have posted to it.
need help from people with strong understanding of composition
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is johntmyers418
1078 guests, 110 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.